You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Lukasz Lenart <lu...@googlemail.com> on 2009/11/13 22:15:46 UTC
xwork: TextProviderSupport vs DefaultTextProvider
What is the difference between those two? I read comments but it isn't
still clear for me why we have two different implementation. It looks
like DefaultTextProvider is used for testing and bootstrap (as
"system" bean). But TextProviderSupport is used for everything else.
Any thoughts?
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: xwork: TextProviderSupport vs DefaultTextProvider
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
If I don't remember wrong the DefaultTextProvider is pushed into the
stack, so i18n works, and TextProviderSupport is used statically from
different places.
musachy
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Lukasz Lenart
<lu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> What is the difference between those two? I read comments but it isn't
> still clear for me why we have two different implementation. It looks
> like DefaultTextProvider is used for testing and bootstrap (as
> "system" bean). But TextProviderSupport is used for everything else.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Lukasz
> http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
RE: xwork: TextProviderSupport vs DefaultTextProvider
Posted by Martin Gainty <mg...@hotmail.com>.
public class TextProviderSupport implements ResourceBundleTextProvider
public interface ResourceBundleTextProvider extends TextProvider
public class DefaultTextProvider implements TextProvider, Serializable, Unchainable
suggest merge of DefaultTextProvider code into ResourceBundleTextProvider (and have TextProviderSupport implement Serializable and Unchainable and TextProvider)..and deprecate DefaultTextProvider
Good Catch Lukas!
Martin Gainty
______________________________________________
Jogi és Bizalmassági kinyilatkoztatás/Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
Ez az
üzenet bizalmas. Ha nem ön az akinek szánva volt, akkor kérjük, hogy
jelentse azt nekünk vissza. Semmiféle továbbítása vagy másolatának
készítése nem megengedett. Ez az üzenet csak ismeret cserét szolgál és
semmiféle jogi alkalmazhatósága sincs. Mivel az electronikus üzenetek
könnyen megváltoztathatóak, ezért minket semmi felelöség nem terhelhet
ezen üzenet tartalma miatt.
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:15:46 +0100
> Subject: xwork: TextProviderSupport vs DefaultTextProvider
> From: lukasz.lenart@googlemail.com
> To: dev@struts.apache.org
>
> What is the difference between those two? I read comments but it isn't
> still clear for me why we have two different implementation. It looks
> like DefaultTextProvider is used for testing and bootstrap (as
> "system" bean). But TextProviderSupport is used for everything else.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Lukasz
> http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/