You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by "James Taylor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/09/26 20:45:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4229) Parent-Child linking rows in System.Catalog break tenant view replication

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16181536#comment-16181536 ] 

James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4229:
---------------------------------------

How about adding the forward pointer when the view is replicated? We have the back pointer as part of the child.

> Parent-Child linking rows in System.Catalog break tenant view replication
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4229
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.11.0, 4.12.0
>            Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>
> PHOENIX-2051 introduced new Parent-Child linking rows to System.Catalog that speed up view deletion. Unfortunately, this breaks assumptions in PHOENIX-3639, which gives a way to replicate tenant views from one cluster to another. (It assumes that all the metadata for a tenant view is owned by the tenant -- the linking rows are not.) 
> PHOENIX-3639 was a workaround in the first place to the more fundamental design problem that Phoenix places the metadata for both table schemas -- which should never be replicated -- in the same table and column family as the metadata for tenant views, which should be replicated. 
> Note that the linking rows also make it more difficult to ever split these two datasets apart, as proposed in PHOENIX-3520.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)