You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Chris Li (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/10 22:36:34 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-11238) Group cache expiry causes namenode slowdown

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Chris Li updated HADOOP-11238:
------------------------------
    Attachment: HADOOP-11238.patch

Uploading patch

> Group cache expiry causes namenode slowdown
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-11238
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11238
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.1
>            Reporter: Chris Li
>            Assignee: Chris Li
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HADOOP-11238.patch
>
>
> Our namenode pauses for 12-60 seconds several times every hour. During these pauses, no new requests can come in.
> Around the time of pauses, we have log messages such as:
> 2014-10-22 13:24:22,688 WARN org.apache.hadoop.security.Groups: Potential performance problem: getGroups(user=xxxxx) took 34507 milliseconds.
> The current theory is:
> 1. Groups has a cache that is refreshed periodically. Each entry has a cache expiry.
> 2. When a cache entry expires, multiple threads can see this expiration and then we have a thundering herd effect where all these threads hit the wire and overwhelm our LDAP servers (we are using ShellBasedUnixGroupsMapping with sssd, how this happens has yet to be established)
> 3. group resolution queries begin to take longer, I've observed it taking 1.2 seconds instead of the usual 0.01-0.03 seconds when measuring in the shell `time groups myself`
> 4. If there is mutual exclusion somewhere along this path, a 1 second pause could lead to a 60 second pause as all the threads compete for the resource. The exact cause hasn't been established
> Potential solutions include:
> 1. Increasing group cache time, which will make the issue less frequent
> 2. Rolling evictions of the cache so we prevent the large spike in LDAP queries
> 3. Gate the cache refresh so that only one thread is responsible for refreshing the cache



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)