You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> on 2006/02/16 23:09:38 UTC
Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Hi Everybody,
Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1
release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
I've posted the release candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
and tagged the source used to build it here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
servicemix-3.0-M1
If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries our
M1 release.
Regards,
Hiram
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Hi Everybody,
I've created an new release candidate build. This one should fix the
problem with running on java 1.4.
I've posted the release candidate here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
and tagged the source used to build it here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
servicemix-3.0-M1
Regards,
Hiram
On Feb 17, 2006, at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Don't worry ...
> The core container has been written to run on jdk 1.4.
> A few minor errors from me will be fixed, that's all.
> Some components are written using jaxb2 and thus depends on jdk 5
> until retrotranslator works fine, in which case the same code will run
> on 1.4.
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
> Hossam Karim wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Sorry for hacking into the conversation like this, but as a user
>> I need to
>> comment:
>>
>> - Geronimo folks disappointed us enough (or just me) with this
>> 1.4certification.
>>
>> - Disappointed again when ServiceMix was removed from Geronimo 1.0
>> (such
>> called) release.
>>
>> - Now please, let us benefit from Java 5.0, most valuable ServiceMix
>> components actually requires Java 5.0. Since 2.0 release, I can run
>> ServiceMix as a JBoss service on Java 5.0 and is very stable.
>>
>> Sorry again, but I thought I had to say this.
>> Hossam Karim
>>
>> On 2/17/06, Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> I really want to be able to run under 1.4 since that's the certified
>>> platform for Geronimo.
>>>
>>> It's not just a matter of classes -- in at least one place there's a
>>> StringBuffer method called that doesn't exist under 1.4.
>>>
>>> Aaron
>>>
>>> On 2/17/06, Jordan Christensen <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Hiram. It now starts up. I've resolved the issue I opened in
>>>>
>>> JIRA.
>>>
>>>> Next: The 2.0 site says that 1.5 is required for building, but
>>>> 1.4 or
>>>> greater is required for running.
>>>>
>>>> When starting M1 on 1.5, everything starts up fine.
>>>> When starting M1 on 1.4, I get a NoClassDefFoundError on
>>>> java/lang/StringBuilder at
>>>> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.container.JBIContainer.activateComponent(
>>>>
>>> JBIContainer.java:942)
>>>
>>>> Is 1.5 now required, or should we remove references to 1.5 specific
>>>> classes? (Like StringBuilder)
>>>>
>>>> If we want to go to 1.4, let me know and I'll see about putting a
>>>> patch together.
>>>>
>>>> Jordan
>>>>
>>>> On 2/17/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jordan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for testing!
>>>>> I've rebuilt with the recent changes that Guillaume made and
>>>>> posted
>>>>> the binaries to the same location.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Hiram
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Jordan Christensen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like activeio is missing from the distribution.
>>>>>> http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-317
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jordan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/16/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Everybody,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks
>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>> thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1
>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>> soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for
>>>>>>> the M1
>>>>>>> release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
>>>>>>> missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've posted the release candidate here:
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and tagged the source used to build it here:
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
>>>>>>> servicemix-3.0-M1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries
>>>>>>>
>>> our
>>>
>>>>>>> M1 release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Hiram
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gu...@worldonline.fr>.
Don't worry ...
The core container has been written to run on jdk 1.4.
A few minor errors from me will be fixed, that's all.
Some components are written using jaxb2 and thus depends on jdk 5
until retrotranslator works fine, in which case the same code will run
on 1.4.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Hossam Karim wrote:
>Hello,
>
> Sorry for hacking into the conversation like this, but as a user I need to
>comment:
>
>- Geronimo folks disappointed us enough (or just me) with this 1.4certification.
>
>- Disappointed again when ServiceMix was removed from Geronimo 1.0 (such
>called) release.
>
>- Now please, let us benefit from Java 5.0, most valuable ServiceMix
>components actually requires Java 5.0. Since 2.0 release, I can run
>ServiceMix as a JBoss service on Java 5.0 and is very stable.
>
>Sorry again, but I thought I had to say this.
>Hossam Karim
>
>On 2/17/06, Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
>
>
>>I really want to be able to run under 1.4 since that's the certified
>>platform for Geronimo.
>>
>>It's not just a matter of classes -- in at least one place there's a
>>StringBuffer method called that doesn't exist under 1.4.
>>
>>Aaron
>>
>>On 2/17/06, Jordan Christensen <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Thanks Hiram. It now starts up. I've resolved the issue I opened in
>>>
>>>
>>JIRA.
>>
>>
>>>Next: The 2.0 site says that 1.5 is required for building, but 1.4 or
>>>greater is required for running.
>>>
>>>When starting M1 on 1.5, everything starts up fine.
>>>When starting M1 on 1.4, I get a NoClassDefFoundError on
>>>java/lang/StringBuilder at
>>>org.apache.servicemix.jbi.container.JBIContainer.activateComponent(
>>>
>>>
>>JBIContainer.java:942)
>>
>>
>>>Is 1.5 now required, or should we remove references to 1.5 specific
>>>classes? (Like StringBuilder)
>>>
>>>If we want to go to 1.4, let me know and I'll see about putting a
>>>patch together.
>>>
>>>Jordan
>>>
>>>On 2/17/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi Jordan,
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for testing!
>>>>I've rebuilt with the recent changes that Guillaume made and posted
>>>>the binaries to the same location.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Hiram
>>>>
>>>>On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Jordan Christensen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Looks like activeio is missing from the distribution.
>>>>>http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-317
>>>>>
>>>>>Jordan
>>>>>
>>>>>On 2/16/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Everybody,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
>>>>>>thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
>>>>>>soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1
>>>>>>release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
>>>>>>missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I've posted the release candidate here:
>>>>>>http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>and tagged the source used to build it here:
>>>>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
>>>>>>servicemix-3.0-M1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
>>>>>>really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>our
>>
>>
>>>>>>M1 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>Hiram
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by Hossam Karim <hr...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Sorry for hacking into the conversation like this, but as a user I need to
comment:
- Geronimo folks disappointed us enough (or just me) with this 1.4certification.
- Disappointed again when ServiceMix was removed from Geronimo 1.0 (such
called) release.
- Now please, let us benefit from Java 5.0, most valuable ServiceMix
components actually requires Java 5.0. Since 2.0 release, I can run
ServiceMix as a JBoss service on Java 5.0 and is very stable.
Sorry again, but I thought I had to say this.
Hossam Karim
On 2/17/06, Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote:
>
> I really want to be able to run under 1.4 since that's the certified
> platform for Geronimo.
>
> It's not just a matter of classes -- in at least one place there's a
> StringBuffer method called that doesn't exist under 1.4.
>
> Aaron
>
> On 2/17/06, Jordan Christensen <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Hiram. It now starts up. I've resolved the issue I opened in
> JIRA.
> >
> > Next: The 2.0 site says that 1.5 is required for building, but 1.4 or
> > greater is required for running.
> >
> > When starting M1 on 1.5, everything starts up fine.
> > When starting M1 on 1.4, I get a NoClassDefFoundError on
> > java/lang/StringBuilder at
> > org.apache.servicemix.jbi.container.JBIContainer.activateComponent(
> JBIContainer.java:942)
> >
> > Is 1.5 now required, or should we remove references to 1.5 specific
> > classes? (Like StringBuilder)
> >
> > If we want to go to 1.4, let me know and I'll see about putting a
> > patch together.
> >
> > Jordan
> >
> > On 2/17/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Jordan,
> > >
> > > Thanks for testing!
> > > I've rebuilt with the recent changes that Guillaume made and posted
> > > the binaries to the same location.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> > > On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Jordan Christensen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looks like activeio is missing from the distribution.
> > > > http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-317
> > > >
> > > > Jordan
> > > >
> > > > On 2/16/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Everybody,
> > > >>
> > > >> Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
> > > >> thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
> > > >> soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1
> > > >> release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
> > > >> missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
> > > >>
> > > >> I've posted the release candidate here:
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
> > > >>
> > > >> and tagged the source used to build it here:
> > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
> > > >> servicemix-3.0-M1
> > > >>
> > > >> If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
> > > >> really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries
> our
> > > >> M1 release.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Hiram
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
I really want to be able to run under 1.4 since that's the certified
platform for Geronimo.
It's not just a matter of classes -- in at least one place there's a
StringBuffer method called that doesn't exist under 1.4.
Aaron
On 2/17/06, Jordan Christensen <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Hiram. It now starts up. I've resolved the issue I opened in JIRA.
>
> Next: The 2.0 site says that 1.5 is required for building, but 1.4 or
> greater is required for running.
>
> When starting M1 on 1.5, everything starts up fine.
> When starting M1 on 1.4, I get a NoClassDefFoundError on
> java/lang/StringBuilder at
> org.apache.servicemix.jbi.container.JBIContainer.activateComponent(JBIContainer.java:942)
>
> Is 1.5 now required, or should we remove references to 1.5 specific
> classes? (Like StringBuilder)
>
> If we want to go to 1.4, let me know and I'll see about putting a
> patch together.
>
> Jordan
>
> On 2/17/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jordan,
> >
> > Thanks for testing!
> > I've rebuilt with the recent changes that Guillaume made and posted
> > the binaries to the same location.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Jordan Christensen wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like activeio is missing from the distribution.
> > > http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-317
> > >
> > > Jordan
> > >
> > > On 2/16/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Everybody,
> > >>
> > >> Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
> > >> thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
> > >> soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1
> > >> release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
> > >> missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
> > >>
> > >> I've posted the release candidate here:
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
> > >>
> > >> and tagged the source used to build it here:
> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
> > >> servicemix-3.0-M1
> > >>
> > >> If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
> > >> really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries our
> > >> M1 release.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Hiram
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gu...@worldonline.fr>.
My mistake.
I usually build on 1.5 and these errors should be fixed.
Please send a patch if you see more errors like that.
Thanks
Guillaume Nodet
Jordan Christensen wrote:
>Thanks Hiram. It now starts up. I've resolved the issue I opened in JIRA.
>
>Next: The 2.0 site says that 1.5 is required for building, but 1.4 or
>greater is required for running.
>
>When starting M1 on 1.5, everything starts up fine.
>When starting M1 on 1.4, I get a NoClassDefFoundError on
>java/lang/StringBuilder at
>org.apache.servicemix.jbi.container.JBIContainer.activateComponent(JBIContainer.java:942)
>
>Is 1.5 now required, or should we remove references to 1.5 specific
>classes? (Like StringBuilder)
>
>If we want to go to 1.4, let me know and I'll see about putting a
>patch together.
>
>Jordan
>
>On 2/17/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Jordan,
>>
>>Thanks for testing!
>>I've rebuilt with the recent changes that Guillaume made and posted
>>the binaries to the same location.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Hiram
>>
>>On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Jordan Christensen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Looks like activeio is missing from the distribution.
>>>http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-317
>>>
>>>Jordan
>>>
>>>On 2/16/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi Everybody,
>>>>
>>>>Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
>>>>thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
>>>>soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1
>>>>release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
>>>>missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
>>>>
>>>>I've posted the release candidate here:
>>>>http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
>>>>
>>>>and tagged the source used to build it here:
>>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
>>>>servicemix-3.0-M1
>>>>
>>>>If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
>>>>really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries our
>>>>M1 release.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Hiram
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by Jordan Christensen <th...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Hiram. It now starts up. I've resolved the issue I opened in JIRA.
Next: The 2.0 site says that 1.5 is required for building, but 1.4 or
greater is required for running.
When starting M1 on 1.5, everything starts up fine.
When starting M1 on 1.4, I get a NoClassDefFoundError on
java/lang/StringBuilder at
org.apache.servicemix.jbi.container.JBIContainer.activateComponent(JBIContainer.java:942)
Is 1.5 now required, or should we remove references to 1.5 specific
classes? (Like StringBuilder)
If we want to go to 1.4, let me know and I'll see about putting a
patch together.
Jordan
On 2/17/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
>
> Thanks for testing!
> I've rebuilt with the recent changes that Guillaume made and posted
> the binaries to the same location.
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Jordan Christensen wrote:
>
> > Looks like activeio is missing from the distribution.
> > http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-317
> >
> > Jordan
> >
> > On 2/16/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Everybody,
> >>
> >> Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
> >> thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
> >> soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1
> >> release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
> >> missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
> >>
> >> I've posted the release candidate here:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
> >>
> >> and tagged the source used to build it here:
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
> >> servicemix-3.0-M1
> >>
> >> If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
> >> really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries our
> >> M1 release.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Hiram
> >>
>
>
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Hi Jordan,
Thanks for testing!
I've rebuilt with the recent changes that Guillaume made and posted
the binaries to the same location.
Regards,
Hiram
On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:32 PM, Jordan Christensen wrote:
> Looks like activeio is missing from the distribution.
> http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-317
>
> Jordan
>
> On 2/16/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
>> thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
>> soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1
>> release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
>> missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
>>
>> I've posted the release candidate here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
>>
>> and tagged the source used to build it here:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
>> servicemix-3.0-M1
>>
>> If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
>> really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries our
>> M1 release.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by Jordan Christensen <th...@gmail.com>.
Looks like activeio is missing from the distribution.
http://jira.activemq.org/jira/browse/SM-317
Jordan
On 2/16/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
> thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
> soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1
> release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
> missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
>
> I've posted the release candidate here:
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
>
> and tagged the source used to build it here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
> servicemix-3.0-M1
>
> If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
> really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries our
> M1 release.
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Hi David,
Unfortunately, that's because the activemq M4 release is still not
official. The binaries are up but we are waiting for everybody to
vote and make them final. I took the liberty to build the M1 of
servicemix against that build since I fully expect servicemix to ship
with M4 of activemq, and I feel confident it's going to be those
binaries.
As soon as the M4 release is official, those jars will be put up on
the repos.
Regards,
Hiram
On Feb 17, 2006, at 11:35 AM, David Grigglestone wrote:
> When building I get:
>
> Attempting to download activemq-core-4.0-M4.jar.
> WARNING: Failed to download activemq-core-4.0-M4.jar.
> Attempting to download activemq-ra-4.0-M4.jar.
> WARNING: Failed to download activemq-ra-4.0-M4.jar.
>
> These do not seem to be at any of the repositories specified in the
> project.properties.
>
> I have had similar problems with other distributions .. not quite
> sure what the protocol is for creating a distribution? Don't folks
> try a clean build (empty repository) before posting a distribution?
>
> thanks, David
>
> Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
>> thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
>> soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the
>> M1 release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we
>> have missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
>>
>> I've posted the release candidate here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
>>
>> and tagged the source used to build it here:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/
>> servicemix-3.0-M1
>>
>> If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
>> really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries
>> our M1 release.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hiram
>>
Re: Help test out the sevicemix 3.0 M1 release candidate
Posted by David Grigglestone <da...@sonicsoftware.com>.
When building I get:
Attempting to download activemq-core-4.0-M4.jar.
WARNING: Failed to download activemq-core-4.0-M4.jar.
Attempting to download activemq-ra-4.0-M4.jar.
WARNING: Failed to download activemq-ra-4.0-M4.jar.
These do not seem to be at any of the repositories specified in the
project.properties.
I have had similar problems with other distributions .. not quite sure
what the protocol is for creating a distribution? Don't folks try a
clean build (empty repository) before posting a distribution?
thanks, David
Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> Servicemix has made some great progress in the recent weeks and I
> thought it might ready to start thinking about doing a M1 release
> soon. So in that spirit, I've built a release candidate for the M1
> release. Like all first attempts at a release, I'm sure we have
> missed something. Please help me find the problems with it.
>
> I've posted the release candidate here:
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-servicemix-3.0-M1/
>
> and tagged the source used to build it here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/tags/servicemix-3.0-M1
>
>
> If no glaring problems are found, and everybody else feels we are
> really ready for a M1, we can call a vote to make these binaries our
> M1 release.
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>