You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@trafficserver.apache.org by bryancall <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2015/11/04 02:47:58 UTC

[GitHub] trafficserver pull request: TS-3984: CID 1328817: multiplexer patc...

Github user bryancall commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/316#issuecomment-153545093
  
    I got a bunch of errors applying this patch:
    dispatch.cc:46:26: error: comparison between NULL and non-pointer ('std::auto_ptr<ats::io::IO>' and NULL) [-Werror,-Wnull-arithmetic]
      (__builtin_expect(!(io != __null), 0) ? __assert_rtn(__func__, "dispatch.cc", 46, "io != NULL") : (void)0);
                          ~~ ^  ~~~~~~
    dispatch.cc:46:26: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('std::auto_ptr<ats::io::IO>' and 'long')
      (__builtin_expect(!(io != __null), 0) ? __assert_rtn(__func__, "dispatch.cc", 46, "io != NULL") : (void)0);
                          ~~ ^  ~~~~~~
    dispatch.cc:221:38: error: comparison between NULL and non-pointer ('std::auto_ptr<ats::io::IO>' and NULL) [-Werror,-Wnull-arithmetic]
        (__builtin_expect(!(iterator->io != __null), 0) ? __assert_rtn(__func__, "dispatch.cc", 221, "iterator->io != NULL") : (void)0);
                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^  ~~~~~~
    dispatch.cc:221:38: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('std::auto_ptr<ats::io::IO>' and 'long')
        (__builtin_expect(!(iterator->io != __null), 0) ? __assert_rtn(__func__, "dispatch.cc", 221, "iterator->io != NULL") : (void)0);
                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^  ~~~~~~
    dispatch.cc:234:38: error: comparison between NULL and non-pointer ('std::auto_ptr<ats::io::IO>' and NULL) [-Werror,-Wnull-arithmetic]
        (__builtin_expect(!(iterator->io != __null), 0) ? __assert_rtn(__func__, "dispatch.cc", 234, "iterator->io != NULL") : (void)0);
                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^  ~~~~~~
    dispatch.cc:234:38: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('std::auto_ptr<ats::io::IO>' and 'long')
        (__builtin_expect(!(iterator->io != __null), 0) ? __assert_rtn(__func__, "dispatch.cc", 234, "iterator->io != NULL") : (void)0);
                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^  ~~~~~~
    In file included from dispatch.cc:26:
    In file included from ./dispatch.h:27:
    /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/memory:1673:31: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'Request'
                ::new((void*)__p) _Up(std::__1::forward<_Args>(__args)...);
                                  ^   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/memory:1600:18: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::__1::allocator<Request>::construct<Request, Request>' requested here
                {__a.construct(__p, std::__1::forward<_Args>(__args)...);}
                     ^
    /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/memory:1453:14: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::__1::allocator_traits<std::__1::allocator<Request> >::__construct<Request, Request>' requested here
                {__construct(__has_construct<allocator_type, _Tp*, _Args...>(),
                 ^
    /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/vector:1609:25: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::__1::allocator_traits<std::__1::allocator<Request> >::construct<Request, Request>' requested here
            __alloc_traits::construct(this->__alloc(),
                            ^
    dispatch.cc:205:7: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::__1::vector<Request, std::__1::allocator<Request> >::push_back' requested here
        r.push_back(Request(host, buffer, location));
          ^
    ./dispatch.h:51:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: expects an l-value for 1st argument
    struct Request {
           ^
    dispatch.cc:38:10: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 3 arguments, but 1 was provided
    Request::Request(const std::string &h, const TSMBuffer b, const TSMLoc l)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---