You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com> on 2009/06/30 12:16:47 UTC
Re: svn commit: r789635 - /sling/trunk/bundles/api/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/api/SlingConstants.java
Hi,
Do we want them in the SlingConstants ? Or aren't they rather
ResourceConstants ?
Regards
Felix
cziegeler@apache.org schrieb:
> Author: cziegeler
> Date: Tue Jun 30 09:23:49 2009
> New Revision: 789635
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789635&view=rev
> Log:
> SLING-944 : Add constants for resource modification events.
>
> Modified:
> sling/trunk/bundles/api/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/api/SlingConstants.java
>
> Modified: sling/trunk/bundles/api/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/api/SlingConstants.java
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/sling/trunk/bundles/api/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/api/SlingConstants.java?rev=789635&r1=789634&r2=789635&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- sling/trunk/bundles/api/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/api/SlingConstants.java (original)
> +++ sling/trunk/bundles/api/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/api/SlingConstants.java Tue Jun 30 09:23:49 2009
> @@ -145,4 +145,65 @@
> * The type of the attribute value is <code>java.lang.Integer</code>.
> */
> public static final String ERROR_STATUS = "javax.servlet.error.status_code";
> +
> + /**
> + * The topic for the OSGi event which is sent when a resource has been added
> + * to the resource tree.
> + * The event contains at least the {@link #PROPERTY_PATH}, {@link #PROPERTY_RESOURCE_SUPER_TYPE}
> + * and {@link #PROPERTY_RESOURCE_TYPE} poperties.
> + * @since 2.0.6
> + */
> + public static final String TOPIC_RESOURCE_ADDED = "org/apache/sling/api/resource/Resource/ADDED";
> +
> + /**
> + * The topic for the OSGi event which is sent when a resource has been removed
> + * from the resource tree.
> + * The event contains at least the {@link #PROPERTY_PATH}.As the resource has already been removed
> + * no further information like resource type etc. might be available.
> + * @since 2.0.6
> + */
> + public static final String TOPIC_RESOURCE_REMOVED = "org/apache/sling/api/resource/Resource/REMOVED";
> +
> + /**
> + * The topic for the OSGi event which is sent when a resource has been changed
> + * in the resource tree.
> + * The event contains at least the {@link #PROPERTY_PATH}, {@link #PROPERTY_RESOURCE_SUPER_TYPE}
> + * and {@link #PROPERTY_RESOURCE_TYPE} poperties.
> + * @since 2.0.6
> + */
> + public static final String TOPIC_RESOURCE_CHANGED = "org/apache/sling/api/resource/Resource/CHANGED";
> +
> + /**
> + * The topic for the OSGi event which is sent when a resource provider has been
> + * added to the resource tree.
> + * The event contains at least the {@link #PROPERTY_PATH} property.
> + * @since 2.0.6
> + */
> + public static final String TOPIC_RESOURCE_PROVIDER_ADDED = "org/apache/sling/api/resource/ResourceProvider/ADDED";
> +
> + /**
> + * The topic for the OSGi event which is sent when a resource provider has been
> + * removed from the resource tree.
> + * The event contains at least the {@link #PROPERTY_PATH} property.
> + * @since 2.0.6
> + */
> + public static final String TOPIC_RESOURCE_PROVIDER_REMOVED = "org/apache/sling/api/resource/ResourceProvider/REMOVED";
> +
> + /**
> + * The name of the event property holding the resource path.
> + * @since 2.0.6
> + */
> + public static final String PROPERTY_PATH = "path";
> +
> + /**
> + * The name of the event property holding the resource type.
> + * @since 2.0.6
> + */
> + public static final String PROPERTY_RESOURCE_TYPE = "resourceType";
> +
> + /**
> + * The name of the event property holding the resource super type.
> + * @since 2.0.6
> + */
> + public static final String PROPERTY_RESOURCE_SUPER_TYPE = "resourceSuperType";
> }
>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r789635 - /sling/trunk/bundles/api/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/api/SlingConstants.java
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Felix Meschberger while:
> Hi,
>
> Do we want them in the SlingConstants ? Or aren't they rather
> ResourceConstants ?
>
Hmm, no real opinion here. While ResourceConstants might make more
sense, I like it when you have a single constants file.
Casrsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org