You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2006/11/26 02:16:54 UTC
[Bug 5208] New: Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5208
Summary: Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.60
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Rules (Eval Tests)
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: vectro@vectro.org
In May 2003, quinlan moved the ORDB (relays.ordb.org) test from
rules/20_dnsbl_tests.cf to rules/70_broken_rules.cf. I suggest we consider
adding it back.
I noticed this because today a spam got through, and I passed it to spamcop, who
noticed the relay. I thought that was odd because spamassassin detected no relay
rule, and upon further investigation I discovered that spamcop uses ORDB but not
spamassassin.
Given that:
- There exist spam pieces whose relay is listed on the ORDB and not other relay
lists.
- The method for score selection has changed considerably since 2003.
- This test is still in productive use elsewhere.
I suggest that we:
- Put it back, but leave it with a default score of zero.
- Include it in the next run of the perceptron, to see if it is more or less
useful than it was in 2003.
Thoughts?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5208] Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5208
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2006-11-26 05:14 -------
if you paste in the rule lines, I'll put it back in as a testing rule and we'll
see how it performs nowadays...
I didn't think it was still in operation, to be honest.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5208] Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5208
rOD-spamassassin@arsecandle.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From rOD-spamassassin@arsecandle.org 2006-12-18 09:48 -------
ORDB's a gonner: http://ordb.org/news/?id=38
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5208] Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5208
------- Additional Comments From vectro@vectro.org 2006-11-26 09:19 -------
Here you go:
header RCVD_IN_ORDB eval:check_rbl_txt('ordb', 'relays.ordb.org.')
describe RCVD_IN_ORDB ORDB: Sender is confirmed open relay
tflags RCDV_IN_ORDB net
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.