You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2006/11/26 02:16:54 UTC

[Bug 5208] New: Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5208

           Summary: Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?
           Product: Spamassassin
           Version: 2.60
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P5
         Component: Rules (Eval Tests)
        AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
        ReportedBy: vectro@vectro.org


In May 2003, quinlan moved the ORDB (relays.ordb.org) test from
rules/20_dnsbl_tests.cf to rules/70_broken_rules.cf. I suggest we consider
adding it back.

I noticed this because today a spam got through, and I passed it to spamcop, who
noticed the relay. I thought that was odd because spamassassin detected no relay
rule, and upon further investigation I discovered that spamcop uses ORDB but not
spamassassin.

Given that:
- There exist spam pieces whose relay is listed on the ORDB and not other relay
lists.
- The method for score selection has changed considerably since 2003.
- This test is still in productive use elsewhere.

I suggest that we:
- Put it back, but leave it with a default score of zero.
- Include it in the next run of the perceptron, to see if it is more or less 
useful than it was in 2003.

Thoughts?



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 5208] Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?

Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5208





------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org  2006-11-26 05:14 -------
if you paste in the rule lines, I'll put it back in as a testing rule and we'll
see how it performs nowadays...

I didn't think it was still in operation, to be honest.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 5208] Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?

Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5208


rOD-spamassassin@arsecandle.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




------- Additional Comments From rOD-spamassassin@arsecandle.org  2006-12-18 09:48 -------
ORDB's a gonner: http://ordb.org/news/?id=38



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 5208] Consider adding back T_RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG?

Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5208





------- Additional Comments From vectro@vectro.org  2006-11-26 09:19 -------
Here you go:

header RCVD_IN_ORDB      eval:check_rbl_txt('ordb', 'relays.ordb.org.')
describe RCVD_IN_ORDB    ORDB: Sender is confirmed open relay
tflags RCDV_IN_ORDB      net



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.