You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "David Sitsky (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/09/03 04:21:22 UTC

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1251) Broker stops delivering messages to some consumers

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40056 ] 

David Sitsky commented on AMQ-1251:
-----------------------------------

Thanks for that Rob, I'll try out the latest code soon.

Following Vadim's advice, I restructured my application to use synchronous receives, and setting prefetchSize = 0 prevented the issue from occurring.  Setting it to a value of 1 or more in my application causes the issues of messages not being delivered.

When I get some time soon, I'll update my activemq and let you know if your changes have indeed fixed the problems I am seeing for other prefetch sizes.




> Broker stops delivering messages to some consumers
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-1251
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1251
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>         Environment: WinXP
>            Reporter: Vadim Pesochinskiy
>            Assignee: Rob Davies
>             Fix For: 5.0.0
>
>         Attachments: TestActiveMQ.java
>
>
> I have around 40 consumers taking messages from a single queue. After awhile 1 or 2 consumers stop receiveing any messages. Going to JMX and stopping corresponding connection causes re-connect and messages are delivered again.
> I reproduced it twice in QA enviroment and now it happened in production. I tried to instrument the code and set the log in debug, but that changed timing and I failed to reproduce it after the changes.
> I suspect that runtime association b/w Queue and Consumer objects is lost on the Broker side. 
> One of the suspects is the empty catch block in the RoundRobinDispatchPolicy (line 64) class. It is possible that the CopyOnWrite array list is messed up and it fails when removed consumer is added back. 
> BTW CopyOnWrite list is good when you mostly read, but not so good when you write for every message delivery and empty catch blocks are bad in any case.
> if (firstMatchingConsumer != null) {
>       // Rotate the consumer list.
>       try {
>                 consumers.remove(firstMatchingConsumer);
>                 consumers.add(firstMatchingConsumer);
>       } catch (Throwable bestEffort) {
>       }
> }

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.