You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Mike Jumper <mi...@guac-dev.org> on 2017/04/17 18:18:08 UTC
Inclusion/exclusion of ASF headers from GNU Autotools output (Was:
[VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1))
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Mike Jumper <mi...@guac-dev.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable
>> stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can handle as a follow
>> up JIRA (run it by legal first, as I'm honestly curious). I suspect the
>> ruling would be that the ASF header is OK to leave there since the tooling
>> itself generates that file including header, but best to get a true
>> ruling.
>>
>
> Thanks, John. We definitely won't move forward with altering the presence of
> the ASF headers until we get a ruling from legal one way or the other. I'm
> equally worried that simply removing them would be just as wrong, due to the
> way GNU Autotools pulls in chunks of build file source verbatim.
>
To all those curious, I've opened the following issue in Legal Discuss
regarding the above:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-300
- Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Inclusion/exclusion of ASF headers from GNU Autotools output
(Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1))
Posted by Ivam Firestone <if...@fsdevelopers.net>.
Going with Mike here.
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM -0400, "Mike Jumper" <mi...@guac-dev.org> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Mike Jumper wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>>
>> So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable
>> stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can handle as a follow
>> up JIRA (run it by legal first, as I'm honestly curious). I suspect the
>> ruling would be that the ASF header is OK to leave there since the tooling
>> itself generates that file including header, but best to get a true
>> ruling.
>>
>
> Thanks, John. We definitely won't move forward with altering the presence of
> the ASF headers until we get a ruling from legal one way or the other. I'm
> equally worried that simply removing them would be just as wrong, due to the
> way GNU Autotools pulls in chunks of build file source verbatim.
>
To all those curious, I've opened the following issue in Legal Discuss
regarding the above:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-300
- Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org