You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/11/06 00:54:18 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (QPID-5297) [Java Broker] make the 1.0 protocol
plugin use a single ProtocolEngineCreator
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13814421#comment-13814421 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on QPID-5297:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 1539202 from [~gemmellr] in branch 'qpid/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1539202 ]
QPID-5297: simplify the 1.0 plugin to only have a single ProtocolEngineCreator
> [Java Broker] make the 1.0 protocol plugin use a single ProtocolEngineCreator
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-5297
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5297
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker
> Reporter: Robbie Gemmell
> Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
> Fix For: 0.25
>
>
> The 1.0 protocol plugin for the broker currently has two ProtocolEngineCreators. Certain areas of the code (such as the 'default supported reply' handling in MultiVersionProtocolEngine#received, and the PortAdapter and Port model objects in general) make assumption that there is only one ProtocolEngineCreator for a given protocol version as this was always the case previously, and so expected behaviour based on this assumption may not hold. The 1.0 protocol plugin should also use a ProtocolEngineCreator to simplify things generally and remove the issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org