You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/12/10 09:56:11 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-1346) Implement striped spin busy lock.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Vladimir Ozerov updated IGNITE-1346:
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.5)
                   1.6

> Implement striped spin busy lock.
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-1346
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1346
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.4
>            Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov
>             Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> We have lots of places in code which require "busy" state semantics:
> 1) Multiple readers access some resource concurrently setting "busy" state.
> 2) At some point a single writer comes, prevents all further readers from accessing the resource, and blocks until all other previous reades are out.
> Currently we do that using either GridBusyLock or GridSpinBusyLock. The first one is based on ReentrantReadWriteLock and the second one is based on GridSpinReadWriteLock. 
> Both implementation have the same performance characteristics, being limited by CPU bus bandwidth when trying to update atomically a shared variable. 
> Better approach is to "stripe" the lock across multiple variables this minimizing contention between threads. That is, in ideal case each thread increments/decrements his own variable without any contention. Writer will have to iterate over all these variables and block on each until all readers are out.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)