svn commit: r1033211 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

[st...@apache.org]

Author: stsp
Date: Tue Nov  9 20:43:20 2010
New Revision: 1033211

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1033211&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Vote for no-wcng-check branch.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=1033211&r1=1033210&r2=1033211&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Tue Nov  9 20:43:20 2010
@@ -158,6 +158,12 @@ Candidate changes:
      ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-no-wcng-check
    Votes:
      +0: cmpilato
+     +1: stsp (I agree with the points cmpilato has raised in the issue.
+               Let's deal with this problem, if it really turns out to
+               be relevant, after 1.7 is released. We can still issue a 1.6.x
+               patch release at that point to fix any such problems.
+               Until then, we don't need to bother our users with this.
+               Especially since doing so is causing them real problems now.)
 
  * r877219, r877239
    In Makefile.in, try svnversion from $PATH if in-tree svnversion fails.