You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by st...@apache.org on 2011/08/18 01:07:09 UTC
svn commit: r1158965 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Aug 17 23:07:08 2011
New Revision: 1158965
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1158965&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Add r1158963 to r1158617 group.
Modified:
subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1158965&r1=1158964&r2=1158965&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Wed Aug 17 23:07:08 2011
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Candidate changes:
Votes:
+1: rhuijben, hwright
- * r1158617, r1158875, r1158886, r1158896, r1158919, r1158924
+ * r1158617, r1158875, r1158886, r1158896, r1158919, r1158924, r1158963
Make 'svn revert' remove unversioned files resulting from reverting a copy.
Fixes issue #3101.
Justification:
@@ -156,9 +156,10 @@ Candidate changes:
the first merge. There are various other cases where the unversioned
files get in the way.
Notes:
- Instead of reviewing the individual commits I would suggest to run
- the following merge and review the resulting diff:
- svn merge -c1158617,1158875,1158886,1158896,1158919,1158924 \
+ All revisions depend on one another, but some amend or even undo changes
+ made in earlier revisions. Instead of reviewing the individual commits
+ I would suggest to run the following merge and review the resulting diff:
+ svn merge -c1158617,1158875,1158886,1158896,1158919,1158924,1158963 \
^/subversion/trunk
Votes:
+1: stsp (but only if this gets into 1.7.0)