You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@stanbol.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2013/01/03 10:56:35 UTC
svn commit: r844738 - in /websites/staging/stanbol/trunk/content: ./
development/index.html
Author: buildbot
Date: Thu Jan 3 09:56:35 2013
New Revision: 844738
Log:
Staging update by buildbot for stanbol
Modified:
websites/staging/stanbol/trunk/content/ (props changed)
websites/staging/stanbol/trunk/content/development/index.html
Propchange: websites/staging/stanbol/trunk/content/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- cms:source-revision (original)
+++ cms:source-revision Thu Jan 3 09:56:35 2013
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1428248
+1428250
Modified: websites/staging/stanbol/trunk/content/development/index.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/staging/stanbol/trunk/content/development/index.html (original)
+++ websites/staging/stanbol/trunk/content/development/index.html Thu Jan 3 09:56:35 2013
@@ -87,8 +87,18 @@
<ul> <li><a href="/">Home</a></li> <li class="item"><a href="/development/">Development</a></li> </ul>
</div>
<h1 class="title">Development</h1>
- <p>This site documents development related issues when working with the
-Apache Stanbol source code and contributing to it.</p>
+ <p>This site documents development related issues when working with the Apache Stanbol source code and contributing to it.</p>
+<p>Everything has to be discussed on the developer <a href="#mailing_lists">mailing list</a> prior to any
+implementation action. If it is not on the list, it did not happen.</p>
+<p>New features should be backed by <a href="#issue_tracking">JIRA issues</a> that describe the goals,
+use cases and software design decisions, which are usually the result
+of dev list discussions. It is much easier to refer to JIRA issues describing
+the implementation details for further discussions and later reference. </p>
+<p>The developers list is not a good place for persistent information, but JIRA issues
+can also be used as an initial form of <a href="#documentation">documentation</a> for new
+features: add usage and test instructions to the JIRA issues once your features
+reaches a usable state, so that others can test them. This is a good way of
+evolving the features documentation, as you work on the implementation.</p>
<p><a name="mailing_lists"></a></p>
<h2 id="mailing-lists">Mailing Lists</h2>
<p>The Apache Stanbol projects uses mailing lists to exchange all relevant information. If something was not mentioned and discussed on the mailing list it did not happen.</p>
@@ -159,24 +169,13 @@ followed by the Apache Stanbol project.<
<li><a href="security.html">Security Aware Coding</a></li>
<li><a href="release-management.html">Release Management</a></li>
</ul>
-<h2 id="discussions-decisions-and-tracking-new-features">Discussions, Decisions and Tracking new Features</h2>
-<p>Everything has to be discussed on the developer <a href="#mailing_lists">mailing list</a> prior to any
-implementation action. If it is not on the list, it did not happen.</p>
-<p>New features should be backed by JIRA issues that describe the goals,
-use cases and software design decisions, which are usually the result
-of dev list discussions. It is much easier to refer to JIRA issues describing
-the implementation details for further discussions and later reference. </p>
-<p>The dev list is not a good place for persistent information, but JIRA issues
-can also be used as an initial form of documentation for new
-features: add usage and test instructions to the JIRA issues once your features
-reaches a usable state, so that others can test them. This is a good way of
-evolving the features documentation, as you work on the implementation.</p>
+<p><a name="documentation"></a></p>
<h2 id="documentation">Documentation</h2>
-<p>As mentioned below, starting with JIRA issues that describe what you're doing and
+<p>For a first documentation starting with JIRA issues that describe what you're doing and
how to use and test it is often good enough, and it's a good way to document things
as you go.</p>
-<p>Once new features reach a somewhat stable state, it's good to document them on
-the website. See <a href="website.html">Website Development</a> for more info.</p>
+<p>Once new features reach a somewhat stable state, it's good to
+<a href="website.html">document them on the website</a>.</p>
</div>
<div id="footer">