You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@aries.apache.org by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> on 2013/01/22 19:04:04 UTC
Releases....
I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks like I'll need:
util-r2
util
proxy-impl
proxy-bundle
blueprint-core
blueprint-cm
blueprint-bundle
jmx-api
jmx-core
jmx-blueprint-core
jmx-bundle
jmx-blueprint-bundle
transaction-blueprint
jpa-blueprint-aries
blueprint-itests
blueprint-testbundleb
If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up now. Thanks!
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
It makes sense (and it was my plan ;)).
A first thing that I wonder is: does it make sense to keep the Java5
compatibility (via the default-java5 parent pom) ?
Anyway, I will send the questions/discussions on the mailing list.
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2013 08:24 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
>> Maybe it would be interesting to update some part of the Maven modules structure, etc.
>> I have a couple of ideas about that, maybe I can prepare patches and submit it, with a discussion on the mailing list.
>
> Likely discuss any major ideas on list first. A lot of the current maven structure is setup for support of the semantic versioning and individual module release things and may be difficult to change. I'd suggest making proposals on the dev list first before spending too much time revamping things that then won't get accepted.
>
> Dan
>
>
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 01/22/2013 07:25 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>>> On 22 January 2013 18:21, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:16 PM, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Any chance of including SPI Fly [1]? Simple all the modules under the
>>>>> spi-fly directory...
>>>>> This would be the 1.0.0 release of SPI Fly which is the Reference
>>>>> Implementation of the OSGi Service Loader mediator spec [2].
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure I'll have time with all the others. I'm mostly trying to
>>>> get all the stuff that Karaf needs so we're not holding up their releases.
>>>>
>>>> If I don't get to it tomorrow with the others, I'll try and do a separate
>>>> release for spifly stuff later this week.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>
>>> Either way is fine with me. Many thanks Dan!
>>>
>>> Note to self: need to get up to speed on doing releases for Aries so I can
>>> help out next time.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Maybe it would be interesting to update some part of the Maven modules structure, etc.
> I have a couple of ideas about that, maybe I can prepare patches and submit it, with a discussion on the mailing list.
Likely discuss any major ideas on list first. A lot of the current maven structure is setup for support of the semantic versioning and individual module release things and may be difficult to change. I'd suggest making proposals on the dev list first before spending too much time revamping things that then won't get accepted.
Dan
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/22/2013 07:25 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>> On 22 January 2013 18:21, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:16 PM, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>
>>>> Any chance of including SPI Fly [1]? Simple all the modules under the
>>>> spi-fly directory...
>>>> This would be the 1.0.0 release of SPI Fly which is the Reference
>>>> Implementation of the OSGi Service Loader mediator spec [2].
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I'll have time with all the others. I'm mostly trying to
>>> get all the stuff that Karaf needs so we're not holding up their releases.
>>>
>>> If I don't get to it tomorrow with the others, I'll try and do a separate
>>> release for spifly stuff later this week.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>
>> Either way is fine with me. Many thanks Dan!
>>
>> Note to self: need to get up to speed on doing releases for Aries so I can
>> help out next time.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Maybe it would be interesting to update some part of the Maven modules
structure, etc.
I have a couple of ideas about that, maybe I can prepare patches and
submit it, with a discussion on the mailing list.
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2013 07:25 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
> On 22 January 2013 18:21, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:16 PM, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> Any chance of including SPI Fly [1]? Simple all the modules under the
>>> spi-fly directory...
>>> This would be the 1.0.0 release of SPI Fly which is the Reference
>>> Implementation of the OSGi Service Loader mediator spec [2].
>>
>> I'm not sure I'll have time with all the others. I'm mostly trying to
>> get all the stuff that Karaf needs so we're not holding up their releases.
>>
>> If I don't get to it tomorrow with the others, I'll try and do a separate
>> release for spifly stuff later this week.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
> Either way is fine with me. Many thanks Dan!
>
> Note to self: need to get up to speed on doing releases for Aries so I can
> help out next time.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
On 22 January 2013 18:21, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:16 PM, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Any chance of including SPI Fly [1]? Simple all the modules under the
> > spi-fly directory...
> > This would be the 1.0.0 release of SPI Fly which is the Reference
> > Implementation of the OSGi Service Loader mediator spec [2].
>
> I'm not sure I'll have time with all the others. I'm mostly trying to
> get all the stuff that Karaf needs so we're not holding up their releases.
>
> If I don't get to it tomorrow with the others, I'll try and do a separate
> release for spifly stuff later this week.
>
> Dan
>
Either way is fine with me. Many thanks Dan!
Note to self: need to get up to speed on doing releases for Aries so I can
help out next time.
Cheers,
David
Re: Releases....
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:16 PM, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Any chance of including SPI Fly [1]? Simple all the modules under the
> spi-fly directory...
> This would be the 1.0.0 release of SPI Fly which is the Reference
> Implementation of the OSGi Service Loader mediator spec [2].
I'm not sure I'll have time with all the others. I'm mostly trying to get all the stuff that Karaf needs so we're not holding up their releases.
If I don't get to it tomorrow with the others, I'll try and do a separate release for spifly stuff later this week.
Dan
>
> Thanks!
>
> David
>
> [1] http://aries.apache.org/modules/spi-fly.html
> [2] Chapter 133 in the OSGi Enterprise R5 spec
> http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5
>
>
> On 22 January 2013 18:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> It sounds good to me !
>>
>> I have a couple of patches to submit, but they are not release blocker.
>> I will review it tonight (my time).
>>
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 01/22/2013 07:04 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look
>>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking
>>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks
>>> like I'll need:
>>>
>>> util-r2
>>> util
>>> proxy-impl
>>> proxy-bundle
>>> blueprint-core
>>> blueprint-cm
>>> blueprint-bundle
>>> jmx-api
>>> jmx-core
>>> jmx-blueprint-core
>>> jmx-bundle
>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
>>> transaction-blueprint
>>> jpa-blueprint-aries
>>> blueprint-itests
>>> blueprint-testbundleb
>>>
>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all tomorrow.
>>> If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up now.
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dan,
Any chance of including SPI Fly [1]? Simple all the modules under the
spi-fly directory...
This would be the 1.0.0 release of SPI Fly which is the Reference
Implementation of the OSGi Service Loader mediator spec [2].
Thanks!
David
[1] http://aries.apache.org/modules/spi-fly.html
[2] Chapter 133 in the OSGi Enterprise R5 spec
http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5
On 22 January 2013 18:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> It sounds good to me !
>
> I have a couple of patches to submit, but they are not release blocker.
> I will review it tonight (my time).
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/22/2013 07:04 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look
>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking
>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks
>> like I'll need:
>>
>> util-r2
>> util
>> proxy-impl
>> proxy-bundle
>> blueprint-core
>> blueprint-cm
>> blueprint-bundle
>> jmx-api
>> jmx-core
>> jmx-blueprint-core
>> jmx-bundle
>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
>> transaction-blueprint
>> jpa-blueprint-aries
>> blueprint-itests
>> blueprint-testbundleb
>>
>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all tomorrow.
>> If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up now.
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: Releases....
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Dan,
It sounds good to me !
I have a couple of patches to submit, but they are not release blocker.
I will review it tonight (my time).
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2013 07:04 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks like I'll need:
>
> util-r2
> util
> proxy-impl
> proxy-bundle
> blueprint-core
> blueprint-cm
> blueprint-bundle
> jmx-api
> jmx-core
> jmx-blueprint-core
> jmx-bundle
> jmx-blueprint-bundle
> transaction-blueprint
> jpa-blueprint-aries
> blueprint-itests
> blueprint-testbundleb
>
> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up now. Thanks!
>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Just another update, even if it's not blocker for the release:
- some Aries modules don't compile with Java7
Once again, it's not release blocker, but I will provide a couple of
patches about that tonight.
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2013 07:04 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks like I'll need:
>
> util-r2
> util
> proxy-impl
> proxy-bundle
> blueprint-core
> blueprint-cm
> blueprint-bundle
> jmx-api
> jmx-core
> jmx-blueprint-core
> jmx-bundle
> jmx-blueprint-bundle
> transaction-blueprint
> jpa-blueprint-aries
> blueprint-itests
> blueprint-testbundleb
>
> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up now. Thanks!
>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Feb 3, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi, Daniel, David,
> Glad to know you are trying release the spi-fly 1.0. Any updates? Looking
> forward the reference implementation of the OSGi Service Loader mediator
> spec:-)
Haven't had time… it looks like I'll need to do another JMX release very shortly due to version range issues. :-( I'll try and include it in that process.
Dan
> - Rex
>
> 2013/1/24 Emily Jiang <em...@googlemail.com>
>
>> Saw your email later. Glad you have sorted out. In the future, it will be
>> the developer who check in changes and then maintain the versions, so
>> she/he can decide what to do when there is a need to bump up the major
>> version.
>> Thanks
>> Emily
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Looks like David and I managed to sort this out. I'll proceed with the
>>> JMX stuff.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ah… there are some incompatible changes in org.apache.aries.jmx.codec
>>> that the version checker is flagging causing it to force it up to 2.0.
>>> I'll see if I can make that package compatible enough to keep it 1.1.0.
>>>>
>>>> OK. I added back in some constructors which is allowing it to drop to
>>> 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
>>>>
>>>> David: can you double check to make sure that change is OK? Also,
>>> should I mark those constructors @Deprecated or not?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:16 AM, David Bosschaert <
>>> david.bosschaert@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's
>>> what
>>>>>> I used when I committed the file from jmx-next.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by
>>> Emily
>>>>>> in revision 1424200:
>>>>>> Revision: 1424200
>>>>>> Author: ejiang
>>>>>> Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24
>>>>>> Message:
>>>>>> ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries
>> modules
>>>>>> (jmx)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it
>> should
>>> be
>>>>>> 1.1...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it
>>> says
>>>>>>> it implements the 1.1 API? Is the version number there correct?
>>> Kind of
>>>>>>> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the
>> normal
>>>>>>> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things
>>> look
>>>>>>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow.
>>> Talking
>>>>>>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such,
>> it
>>> looks
>>>>>>> like I'll need:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> util-r2
>>>>>>>> util
>>>>>>>> proxy-impl
>>>>>>>> proxy-bundle
>>>>>>>> blueprint-core
>>>>>>>> blueprint-cm
>>>>>>>> blueprint-bundle
>>>>>>>> jmx-api
>>>>>>>> jmx-core
>>>>>>>> jmx-blueprint-core
>>>>>>>> jmx-bundle
>>>>>>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
>>>>>>>> transaction-blueprint
>>>>>>>> jpa-blueprint-aries
>>>>>>>> blueprint-itests
>>>>>>>> blueprint-testbundleb
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all
>>>>>>> tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please
>>> speak up
>>>>>>> now. Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Emily
>> =================
>> Emily Jiang
>> ejiang@apache.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com>.
hi, Daniel, David,
Glad to know you are trying release the spi-fly 1.0. Any updates? Looking
forward the reference implementation of the OSGi Service Loader mediator
spec:-)
- Rex
2013/1/24 Emily Jiang <em...@googlemail.com>
> Saw your email later. Glad you have sorted out. In the future, it will be
> the developer who check in changes and then maintain the versions, so
> she/he can decide what to do when there is a need to bump up the major
> version.
> Thanks
> Emily
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Looks like David and I managed to sort this out. I'll proceed with the
> > JMX stuff.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ah… there are some incompatible changes in org.apache.aries.jmx.codec
> > that the version checker is flagging causing it to force it up to 2.0.
> > I'll see if I can make that package compatible enough to keep it 1.1.0.
> > >
> > > OK. I added back in some constructors which is allowing it to drop to
> > 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > >
> > > David: can you double check to make sure that change is OK? Also,
> > should I mark those constructors @Deprecated or not?
> > >
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Dan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:16 AM, David Bosschaert <
> > david.bosschaert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's
> > what
> > >>> I used when I committed the file from jmx-next.
> > >>>
> > >>> However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by
> > Emily
> > >>> in revision 1424200:
> > >>> Revision: 1424200
> > >>> Author: ejiang
> > >>> Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24
> > >>> Message:
> > >>> ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries
> modules
> > >>> (jmx)
> > >>>
> > >>> Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it
> should
> > be
> > >>> 1.1...
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>> David
> > >>>
> > >>> On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> David,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it
> > says
> > >>>> it implements the 1.1 API? Is the version number there correct?
> > Kind of
> > >>>> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the
> normal
> > >>>> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Dan
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things
> > look
> > >>>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow.
> > Talking
> > >>>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such,
> it
> > looks
> > >>>> like I'll need:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> util-r2
> > >>>>> util
> > >>>>> proxy-impl
> > >>>>> proxy-bundle
> > >>>>> blueprint-core
> > >>>>> blueprint-cm
> > >>>>> blueprint-bundle
> > >>>>> jmx-api
> > >>>>> jmx-core
> > >>>>> jmx-blueprint-core
> > >>>>> jmx-bundle
> > >>>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
> > >>>>> transaction-blueprint
> > >>>>> jpa-blueprint-aries
> > >>>>> blueprint-itests
> > >>>>> blueprint-testbundleb
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all
> > >>>> tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please
> > speak up
> > >>>> now. Thanks!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> > >>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Daniel Kulp
> > >>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Daniel Kulp
> > >> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Kulp
> > > dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Emily
> =================
> Emily Jiang
> ejiang@apache.org
>
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Re: Releases....
Posted by Emily Jiang <em...@googlemail.com>.
Saw your email later. Glad you have sorted out. In the future, it will be
the developer who check in changes and then maintain the versions, so
she/he can decide what to do when there is a need to bump up the major
version.
Thanks
Emily
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Looks like David and I managed to sort this out. I'll proceed with the
> JMX stuff.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Ah… there are some incompatible changes in org.apache.aries.jmx.codec
> that the version checker is flagging causing it to force it up to 2.0.
> I'll see if I can make that package compatible enough to keep it 1.1.0.
> >
> > OK. I added back in some constructors which is allowing it to drop to
> 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
> >
> > David: can you double check to make sure that change is OK? Also,
> should I mark those constructors @Deprecated or not?
> >
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:16 AM, David Bosschaert <
> david.bosschaert@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's
> what
> >>> I used when I committed the file from jmx-next.
> >>>
> >>> However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by
> Emily
> >>> in revision 1424200:
> >>> Revision: 1424200
> >>> Author: ejiang
> >>> Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24
> >>> Message:
> >>> ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries modules
> >>> (jmx)
> >>>
> >>> Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it should
> be
> >>> 1.1...
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> David
> >>>
> >>> On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> David,
> >>>>
> >>>> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it
> says
> >>>> it implements the 1.1 API? Is the version number there correct?
> Kind of
> >>>> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the normal
> >>>> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Dan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things
> look
> >>>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow.
> Talking
> >>>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it
> looks
> >>>> like I'll need:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> util-r2
> >>>>> util
> >>>>> proxy-impl
> >>>>> proxy-bundle
> >>>>> blueprint-core
> >>>>> blueprint-cm
> >>>>> blueprint-bundle
> >>>>> jmx-api
> >>>>> jmx-core
> >>>>> jmx-blueprint-core
> >>>>> jmx-bundle
> >>>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
> >>>>> transaction-blueprint
> >>>>> jpa-blueprint-aries
> >>>>> blueprint-itests
> >>>>> blueprint-testbundleb
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all
> >>>> tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please
> speak up
> >>>> now. Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Daniel Kulp
> >>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Kulp
> >> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
--
Thanks
Emily
=================
Emily Jiang
ejiang@apache.org
Re: Releases....
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Looks like David and I managed to sort this out. I'll proceed with the JMX stuff.
Dan
On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Ah… there are some incompatible changes in org.apache.aries.jmx.codec that the version checker is flagging causing it to force it up to 2.0. I'll see if I can make that package compatible enough to keep it 1.1.0.
>
> OK. I added back in some constructors which is allowing it to drop to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
>
> David: can you double check to make sure that change is OK? Also, should I mark those constructors @Deprecated or not?
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:16 AM, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's what
>>> I used when I committed the file from jmx-next.
>>>
>>> However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by Emily
>>> in revision 1424200:
>>> Revision: 1424200
>>> Author: ejiang
>>> Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24
>>> Message:
>>> ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries modules
>>> (jmx)
>>>
>>> Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it should be
>>> 1.1...
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> David,
>>>>
>>>> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it says
>>>> it implements the 1.1 API? Is the version number there correct? Kind of
>>>> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the normal
>>>> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look
>>>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking
>>>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks
>>>> like I'll need:
>>>>>
>>>>> util-r2
>>>>> util
>>>>> proxy-impl
>>>>> proxy-bundle
>>>>> blueprint-core
>>>>> blueprint-cm
>>>>> blueprint-bundle
>>>>> jmx-api
>>>>> jmx-core
>>>>> jmx-blueprint-core
>>>>> jmx-bundle
>>>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
>>>>> transaction-blueprint
>>>>> jpa-blueprint-aries
>>>>> blueprint-itests
>>>>> blueprint-testbundleb
>>>>>
>>>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all
>>>> tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up
>>>> now. Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ah… there are some incompatible changes in org.apache.aries.jmx.codec that the version checker is flagging causing it to force it up to 2.0. I'll see if I can make that package compatible enough to keep it 1.1.0.
OK. I added back in some constructors which is allowing it to drop to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
David: can you double check to make sure that change is OK? Also, should I mark those constructors @Deprecated or not?
Dan
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:16 AM, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's what
>> I used when I committed the file from jmx-next.
>>
>> However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by Emily
>> in revision 1424200:
>> Revision: 1424200
>> Author: ejiang
>> Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24
>> Message:
>> ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries modules
>> (jmx)
>>
>> Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it should be
>> 1.1...
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
>>
>> On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it says
>>> it implements the 1.1 API? Is the version number there correct? Kind of
>>> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the normal
>>> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look
>>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking
>>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks
>>> like I'll need:
>>>>
>>>> util-r2
>>>> util
>>>> proxy-impl
>>>> proxy-bundle
>>>> blueprint-core
>>>> blueprint-cm
>>>> blueprint-bundle
>>>> jmx-api
>>>> jmx-core
>>>> jmx-blueprint-core
>>>> jmx-bundle
>>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
>>>> transaction-blueprint
>>>> jpa-blueprint-aries
>>>> blueprint-itests
>>>> blueprint-testbundleb
>>>>
>>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all
>>> tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up
>>> now. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Ah… there are some incompatible changes in org.apache.aries.jmx.codec that the version checker is flagging causing it to force it up to 2.0. I'll see if I can make that package compatible enough to keep it 1.1.0.
Dan
On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:16 AM, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's what
> I used when I committed the file from jmx-next.
>
> However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by Emily
> in revision 1424200:
> Revision: 1424200
> Author: ejiang
> Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24
> Message:
> ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries modules
> (jmx)
>
> Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it should be
> 1.1...
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> David,
>>
>> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it says
>> it implements the 1.1 API? Is the version number there correct? Kind of
>> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the normal
>> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
>>
>>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look
>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking
>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks
>> like I'll need:
>>>
>>> util-r2
>>> util
>>> proxy-impl
>>> proxy-bundle
>>> blueprint-core
>>> blueprint-cm
>>> blueprint-bundle
>>> jmx-api
>>> jmx-core
>>> jmx-blueprint-core
>>> jmx-bundle
>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
>>> transaction-blueprint
>>> jpa-blueprint-aries
>>> blueprint-itests
>>> blueprint-testbundleb
>>>
>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all
>> tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up
>> now. Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>
>>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Releases....
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's what
I used when I committed the file from jmx-next.
However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by Emily
in revision 1424200:
Revision: 1424200
Author: ejiang
Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24
Message:
ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries modules
(jmx)
Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it should be
1.1...
Cheers,
David
On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it says
> it implements the 1.1 API? Is the version number there correct? Kind of
> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the normal
> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look
> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking
> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks
> like I'll need:
> >
> > util-r2
> > util
> > proxy-impl
> > proxy-bundle
> > blueprint-core
> > blueprint-cm
> > blueprint-bundle
> > jmx-api
> > jmx-core
> > jmx-blueprint-core
> > jmx-bundle
> > jmx-blueprint-bundle
> > transaction-blueprint
> > jpa-blueprint-aries
> > blueprint-itests
> > blueprint-testbundleb
> >
> > If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all
> tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up
> now. Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> > Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
Re: Releases....
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
David,
I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it says it implements the 1.1 API? Is the version number there correct? Kind of concerned about that version number as it would be outside the normal import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
Dan
On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin. Things look OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow. Talking to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, it looks like I'll need:
>
> util-r2
> util
> proxy-impl
> proxy-bundle
> blueprint-core
> blueprint-cm
> blueprint-bundle
> jmx-api
> jmx-core
> jmx-blueprint-core
> jmx-bundle
> jmx-blueprint-bundle
> transaction-blueprint
> jpa-blueprint-aries
> blueprint-itests
> blueprint-testbundleb
>
> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all tomorrow. If you have any additional updates or changes, please speak up now. Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com