RE: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3]

[Tony Dodd <to...@btinternet.com>]

I've lots of users who still use Apache 1.3, though personally I use 2.0. It
isn't just a question of the systems we developers use: we have in turn to
support users hosting our developed services who are running pretty
unsophisticated systems. Given that it works nicely now and is not too hard
for people without much technical background to set up, I'd be sorry if you
were to drop it.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:sabeysinghe@virtusa.com] 
>Sent: 05 May 2005 17:26
>To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org
>Subject: [Fwd: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3]
>
>Would appreciate thoughts on this.
>
>Please see the mail tail below.
>
>Thanks,
>Samisa...
>
>-----Forwarded Message-----
>From: John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com>
>To: Apache AXIS C Developers List <ax...@ws.apache.org>
>Subject: Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3
>Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 11:17:27 +0100
>
>
>I've been thinking this too - we should go to the user list first.
>
>
>
>
>Samisa Abeysinghe
><sa...@virtusa.com>
>
>05/05/2005 16:30
>         Please respond to
>  "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
>                To
>Apache AXIS C
>Developers List
><ax...@ws.apache.org>
>                cc
>
>           Subject
>Apache 2.0 vs
>Apache 1.3
>
>
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of 
>queries we are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0.
>Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on 
>server side?
>This will simplify the docs as well.
>
>Thoughts please.
>
>Thanks,
>Samisa...
>--
>Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@virtusa.com> Virtusa Corporation
>