RE: [PATCH][Collections] SequencedHashMap: equals, hashCode, toSt ring

["Michael A. Smith" <ma...@apache.org>]

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Jack, Paul wrote:
> > Extending AbstractMap is not the right way to add an equals, 
> > hashcode and 
> > toString method.  I just committed real implementations for 
> > the methods.
> 
> Was there something wrong with AbstractMap's implementations,
> or did you just want to keep SequencedHashMap's superclass
> as Object?  I'm just wondering if there's something my 
> unit tests aren't catching...

Just wanted to keep the superclass as Object.  I suppose it doesn't make 
that much of a difference really, so my statement on it being "not the 
right way" is probably a bit harsh.  Sorry about that.  :)

regards
michael



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>