You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com> on 2006/11/08 08:16:14 UTC
rpm version mismatchs "svn --version"
Folks,
I install 1.4 rpm but after installation, it shows 1.3.2 via svn --version
and browser shows svn 1.1.4. I am lost:) Hope you can give some hints.
Firefox browser msg
=================
Apache/2.0.59 (Unix) DAV/2 SVN/1.1.4 Server at ... Port 80
svn --version
==========
[] svn --version
svn, version 1.3.2 (r19776)
compiled Aug 21 2006, 07:26:13
RPM installed (listed in installation order)
================================
1.
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/rhel-4/i386/apr-util-0.9.12-1.i386.rpm
2.
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/rhel-4/i386/apr-0.9.12-1.i386.rpm
3.
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/rhel-4/i386/subversion-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm
4.
http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/apache/httpd/binaries/rpm/i386/httpd-2.0.59-1.i386.rpm
5.
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/rhel-4/i386/mod_dav_svn-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm
thx for your help
Tim
Re: rpm version mismatchs "svn --version"
Posted by Ryan Schmidt <su...@ryandesign.com>.
On Nov 8, 2006, at 02:39, Tim Liu wrote:
>> > I install 1.4 rpm but after installation, it shows 1.3.2 via svn --
>> > version and browser shows svn 1.1.4. I am lost:) Hope you can give
>> > some hints.
>> >
>> > Firefox browser msg
>> > =================
>> > Apache/2.0.59 (Unix) DAV/2 SVN/1.1.4 Server at ... Port 80
>>
>> You apparently have an older mod_dav_svn installed in your Apache
>> modules folder.
>>
>>
>> > svn --version
>> > ==========
>> > [] svn --version
>> > svn, version 1.3.2 (r19776)
>> > compiled Aug 21 2006, 07:26:13
>>
>> You apparently have an older svn binary somewhere in your path.
>> "which svn" should show you where.
>
> you are right. Do you know the link for 1.4 binary rpm for Apache,
> Red Hat Ent Lx4.0, SVN?
>
> I dowload via http://the.earth.li/pub/subversion/
> summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/rhel-4/i386/
As far as I can tell, that is the correct place to download from.
That's the URL linked to from the Subversion download page.
> I assume it is 1.4 but 1.1.4
>
> [] rpm -qlp subversion-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm
> /usr/bin/svn
> ...
> sjc-csm-lx-2[/usr/bin] ./svn --version
> svn, version 1.1.4 (r13838)
> compiled Apr 12 2005, 16:01:59
I don't know how to explain that, and would have to defer to David
Summers, who created those RPMs. His email address is listed on the
Subversion download page.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Branching strategy - Feature vs Release
Posted by Richard Gundersen <ri...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Duncan
Yep, that sounds like a mixture of the two. I think this supports my side of
the argument I'm having at work, where one camp is determined to go for a
pure 'release-branch' strategy, and the camp I'm in going for a pure
"feature-branch" strategy. This is the way I see it:
The feature-based approach is:
1) 100% capable of managing the entire lifecycle WITHOUT help from other
strategies
2) Very safe
3) Very flexible
The downside is that you have to overcome your fear of merging branches.
But, I don't have that fear because I've done it so often. Yeah,
occasionally there's the odd tricky merge (especially if you forget to merge
trunk changes into your branch for a few weeks) but it's nothing to worry
about if you do it properly.
The release-based approach is:
1) Easy, because there's not as much merging
2) Especially suited to systems with a simple release schedule, where any
and all changes are lumped together in one big release (note that: it's NO
BETTER than the feature-based approach in this regard)
There comes a point though, when the release-based approach isn't powerful
enough, and it has to start using feature branches - a kind of hybrid
strategy. When this time comes, you have the additional branches that you
set out to try and avoid in the first place, you have the complication of
merging that you originally wanted to avoid, and you have an unstable trunk.
Ultimately, I would be asking myself 'why not use feature branching in the
first place?'.
NB I'm not trying to be provocative in case that's how I come accross. I
genuinely find this an interesting debate and I'm grateful for the replies
I've had already (for and against)
Richard
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live� Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free!
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: rpm version mismatchs "svn --version"
Posted by Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com>.
I have removed those packages and reinstall 1.4.2 from another link. It is
working fine.
http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/1.4.2/rhel-4/i386/
thx
Tim
On 11/8/06, Kris Deugau <kd...@vianet.ca> wrote:
>
> Tim Liu wrote:
> > It is 1.1.4
> >
> > [] rpm -q subversion
> > subversion-1.1.4-2.ent
>
> OK, so as far as RPM is concerned (as well as most of the rest of your
> system, most likely) Subversion is v1.1.4, not the v1.4.0 you downloaded.
>
> What happens when you try to run "rpm -Uvh subversion-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm"?
>
> I'm guessing rpm will complain about one or more missing dependencies.
> Most of them will probably be solved by the rest of the files you
> downloaded from David Summers' site. Installing them all at once is
> simplest if you want to run a Subversion server through Apache. I can't
> comment on the details of what's required because I install Subversion
> from a different source on my systems.
>
> FWIW, if you're having trouble getting the right packages installed, I
> recommend finding a yum repository to install from, rather than manually
> downloading and installing individual package files. I don't know if
> David provides any support for that (of if someone mirroring his
> packages does).
>
> -kgd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
Re: rpm version mismatchs "svn --version"
Posted by Kris Deugau <kd...@vianet.ca>.
Tim Liu wrote:
> It is 1.1.4
>
> [] rpm -q subversion
> subversion-1.1.4-2.ent
OK, so as far as RPM is concerned (as well as most of the rest of your
system, most likely) Subversion is v1.1.4, not the v1.4.0 you downloaded.
What happens when you try to run "rpm -Uvh subversion-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm"?
I'm guessing rpm will complain about one or more missing dependencies.
Most of them will probably be solved by the rest of the files you
downloaded from David Summers' site. Installing them all at once is
simplest if you want to run a Subversion server through Apache. I can't
comment on the details of what's required because I install Subversion
from a different source on my systems.
FWIW, if you're having trouble getting the right packages installed, I
recommend finding a yum repository to install from, rather than manually
downloading and installing individual package files. I don't know if
David provides any support for that (of if someone mirroring his
packages does).
-kgd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: rpm version mismatchs "svn --version"
Posted by Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com>.
It is 1.1.4
[] rpm -q subversion
subversion-1.1.4-2.ent
thx
Tim
On 11/8/06, Kris Deugau <kd...@vianet.ca> wrote:
>
> Tim Liu wrote:
> > I dowload via
> >
> http://the.earth.li/pub/subversion/summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/rhel-4/i386/
>
> That should be OK.
>
> > I assume it is 1.4 but 1.1.4
> >
> > [] rpm -qlp subversion-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm
> > /usr/bin/svn
>
> You're querying the package file "subversion-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm" in the
> current directory, not the installed package "subversion-......."
> (whatever that actually is).
>
> Try rpm -qf `which svn`, to see if rpm even knows about the one that
> seems to be coming up.
>
> Try rpm -q subversion; that should tell you which version of SVN rpm
> thinks is actually installed.
>
> -kgd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
Re: rpm version mismatchs "svn --version"
Posted by Kris Deugau <kd...@vianet.ca>.
Tim Liu wrote:
> I dowload via
> http://the.earth.li/pub/subversion/summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/rhel-4/i386/
That should be OK.
> I assume it is 1.4 but 1.1.4
>
> [] rpm -qlp subversion-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm
> /usr/bin/svn
You're querying the package file "subversion-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm" in the
current directory, not the installed package "subversion-......."
(whatever that actually is).
Try rpm -qf `which svn`, to see if rpm even knows about the one that
seems to be coming up.
Try rpm -q subversion; that should tell you which version of SVN rpm
thinks is actually installed.
-kgd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: rpm version mismatchs "svn --version"
Posted by Tim Liu <ti...@gmail.com>.
Ryan
you are right. Do you know the link for 1.4 binary rpm for Apache, Red Hat
Ent Lx4.0, SVN?
I dowload via
http://the.earth.li/pub/subversion/summersoft.fay.ar.us/pub/subversion/latest/rhel-4/i386/
I assume it is 1.4 but 1.1.4
[] rpm -qlp subversion-1.4.0-1.i386.rpm
/usr/bin/svn
...
sjc-csm-lx-2[/usr/bin] ./svn --version
svn, version 1.1.4 (r13838)
compiled Apr 12 2005, 16:01:59
thx a lot
Tim
On 11/8/06, Ryan Schmidt <su...@ryandesign.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 2006, at 02:16, Tim Liu wrote:
>
> > I install 1.4 rpm but after installation, it shows 1.3.2 via svn --
> > version and browser shows svn 1.1.4. I am lost:) Hope you can give
> > some hints.
> >
> > Firefox browser msg
> > =================
> > Apache/2.0.59 (Unix) DAV/2 SVN/1.1.4 Server at ... Port 80
>
> You apparently have an older mod_dav_svn installed in your Apache
> modules folder.
>
>
> > svn --version
> > ==========
> > [] svn --version
> > svn, version 1.3.2 (r19776)
> > compiled Aug 21 2006, 07:26:13
>
> You apparently have an older svn binary somewhere in your path.
> "which svn" should show you where.
>
>
>
>
Re: rpm version mismatchs "svn --version"
Posted by Ryan Schmidt <su...@ryandesign.com>.
On Nov 8, 2006, at 02:16, Tim Liu wrote:
> I install 1.4 rpm but after installation, it shows 1.3.2 via svn --
> version and browser shows svn 1.1.4. I am lost:) Hope you can give
> some hints.
>
> Firefox browser msg
> =================
> Apache/2.0.59 (Unix) DAV/2 SVN/1.1.4 Server at ... Port 80
You apparently have an older mod_dav_svn installed in your Apache
modules folder.
> svn --version
> ==========
> [] svn --version
> svn, version 1.3.2 (r19776)
> compiled Aug 21 2006, 07:26:13
You apparently have an older svn binary somewhere in your path.
"which svn" should show you where.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org