You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "ant elder (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org> on 2007/10/16 10:48:50 UTC
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1850) I would suggest a binding-jms with
objectweb's joram
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535203 ]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1850:
------------------------------------
(sorry typo, its JORAM thats under LGPL not JOTM, but JORAM is what this jira is about so we can't use it while under LGPL)
> I would suggest a binding-jms with objectweb's joram
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1850
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1850
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SCA Misc Binding Extensions
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
> Environment: winxp jdk1.6 JORAM, Tuscany trunk
> Reporter: gengshaoguang
>
> Hi, every one, with special repect to Amita.
> This issue addresses SCA1.0's global transaction.
> I would first mention something seems not related.
> It is binding-jms. Since we will provide a transaction of 2PC, in a distributed env, only soap over jms could be enlisted in a global transaction.
> Jms provided by objectweb's joram, is more integrated with JOTM's transaction framework. Where as ActiveMQ's transaction is more compatible with spring. And joram's XA is clearer.
> If my suggest is of some of your interest, I will keep on contribute code of it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org