Does mod_jk require 3.2? (was :Re: Multiple Unique Instances WITHOUT multiple JVM?)

[Will England <wi...@mylanders.com>]

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Jeff Kilbride wrote:

> Hi Will,
> 
> Take a look at the mod_jk HowTo at:
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/index.html
> 
> There's an example virtual host configuration using a single JVM at the end
> of the file.


No way - I can just mount /webhome/customer1/servlet like that?  No
aliasing from /servlet/ to http://server:port/servlet?

Whoah.

So, does mod_jk require using tomcat 3.2?

Will

Re: Does mod_jk require 3.2? (was :Re: Multiple Unique Instances WITHOUT multiple JVM?)

[Jeff Kilbride <je...@kilbride.com>]

Nope. With the new <Host> parameter in server.xml, virtual hosting in the
same JVM becomes pretty trivial.

The virtual host examples in the mod_jk HowTo require Tomcat 3.2.1+, I
believe. The <Host> param is new in this version.

Thanks,
--jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Will England" <wi...@mylanders.com>
To: <to...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 7:20 PM
Subject: Does mod_jk require 3.2? (was :Re: Multiple Unique Instances
WITHOUT multiple JVM?)


> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Jeff Kilbride wrote:
>
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > Take a look at the mod_jk HowTo at:
> >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/src/doc/index.html
> >
> > There's an example virtual host configuration using a single JVM at the
end
> > of the file.
>
>
> No way - I can just mount /webhome/customer1/servlet like that?  No
> aliasing from /servlet/ to http://server:port/servlet?
>
> Whoah.
>
> So, does mod_jk require using tomcat 3.2?
>
> Will
>
>