You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@milagro.apache.org by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> on 2017/10/29 10:34:39 UTC
State of Milagro
Hi All,
Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions raised by
Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your report
explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
John
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@apache.org>.
On Sun, 2017-10-29 at 10:34 +0000, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi All,
> [chop]
OK, I'm going to try and braindump some of this. I expect
this may tread on some toes: feel free to shoot me down.
At the start of Milagro, I think it fair to say I was acting
as a bridge between Miracl and Apache. I was on Miracl's slack
channels, and was routinely pinged there on matters concerning
Milagro. Some of those I could easily deal with; others were
OK but should really have been handled on-list, while another
category kind-of saw me as a proxy sysop for Apache resources.
I tried to pull back gradually from this role, pointing out
the need for project decisions and discussion around them to
happen on-list, and that non-trivial questions concerning
Process and Infrastructure needed to be raised on general@.
The latter was problematic, as I was not always well-placed
to represent either ASF (/infra) or Milagro to each other
(more below). However, I felt we were making little progress,
and when my slack access suddenly disappeared (I don't know
if that was intentional), I concluded it was probably for the
best that communication be forced to other channels. But
communication had more-or-less dried up, and so it has remained.
The last time I tried/hoped to help things along was a year
ago in Seville (Apachecon), when I also raised some of the
general issues (without naming the project, of course) at barcamp.
There has been one particular matter of project infrastructure
that may have been holding things back. Namely, that the
project strongly wanted full two-way mirroring with github,
to support an existing workflow. At the time, that existed
on an experimental basis for a couple of Apache projects
(Trafficserver being one), but wasn't being made widely
available "on demand". I should perhaps have tried to kick
off discussion on general@ myself, but I feared it would go
nowhere, as my understanding of both project and infra issues
was insufficient to bat the questions that would follow.
As it stands, while Milagro is a great project, I don't feel it
really looks like an Apache project. I'd really like to see
day-to-day project activity from the team, and insofar as
there are issues (such as the above) on the Apache side,
perhaps the team can seek to raise them. A reset button?
--
Nick Kew
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by Nikolai Stoilov <ni...@miracl.com>.
I added the report to the wiki.
Thanks,
Nikolai
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:25 AM Nikolai Stoilov <ni...@miracl.com>
wrote:
> I'll submit a report later today.
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:20 AM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok, thanks for clarifying those items.
>>
>> The reason I was originally stopping by was due to lack of report. Any
>> update on a report?
>>
>> John
>>
>> On 2017-11-08 03:19, Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com> wrote:
>> > The issue was that newest crypto code was initially published under
>> https://github.com/milagro-crypto/milagro-crypto-c, but it will be moved
>> to https://github.com/apache.
>> >
>> > Simeon
>> >
>> > On 8/11/17, 04:47, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2017-11-07 05:18, Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > No, exactly the opposite!
>> > > The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the
>> project can continue as it should.
>> > > Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.
>> >
>> > Which issue are you referring to?
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Simeon Aladjem
>> > >
>> > > On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi" <gi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello everybody,
>> > > this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
>> > > BR,
>> > > Giorgio
>> > >
>> > > <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>> >
>> > > Libre
>> > > de virus. www.avast.com
>> > > <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>> >
>> > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>> > >
>> > > 2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <
>> simeon.aladjem@miracl.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > Hello,
>> > > >
>> > > > To the best of my understanding, the current problem with
>> the project is
>> > > > the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a
>> different GitHub
>> > > > organization.
>> > > > I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the
>> intention to make this
>> > > > move was suspended.
>> > > >
>> > > > Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto
>> code, which
>> > > > doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a
>> missive change
>> > > > from the current one.
>> > > > We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the
>> project
>> > > > code-base and repositories.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best,
>> > > > Simeon Aladjem
>> > > > MIRACL
>> > > >
>> > > > On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <
>> johndament@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
>> > > >
>> > > > Where do you want this project to go? I know from an
>> IPMC standpoint,
>> > > > I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
>> > > >
>> > > > John
>> > > >
>> > > > On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <
>> yamamoto.go@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I am wondering why this project does not go. We have
>> a set of MFA
>> > > > server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually
>> work fine. We
>> > > > have been working for the code and are willing to donate
>> the code. It
>> > > > sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think we should start from releasing the library
>> part and fix the
>> > > > API for the library.
>> > > > > What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > Go Yamamoto
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
>> > > > > To: dev@milagro.apache.org
>> > > > > Subject: State of Milagro
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi All,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was
>> removed due to
>> > > > questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering
>> the questions
>> > > > raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign
>> off on your
>> > > > report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > John
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
> --
> Nikolai Stoilov
> NOC/Support Team Lead
> MIRACL
>
--
Nikolai Stoilov
NOC/Support Team Lead
MIRACL
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by Nikolai Stoilov <ni...@miracl.com>.
I'll submit a report later today.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:20 AM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok, thanks for clarifying those items.
>
> The reason I was originally stopping by was due to lack of report. Any
> update on a report?
>
> John
>
> On 2017-11-08 03:19, Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com> wrote:
> > The issue was that newest crypto code was initially published under
> https://github.com/milagro-crypto/milagro-crypto-c, but it will be moved
> to https://github.com/apache.
> >
> > Simeon
> >
> > On 8/11/17, 04:47, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2017-11-07 05:18, Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>
> wrote:
> > > No, exactly the opposite!
> > > The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the
> project can continue as it should.
> > > Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.
> >
> > Which issue are you referring to?
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Simeon Aladjem
> > >
> > > On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi" <gi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello everybody,
> > > this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
> > > BR,
> > > Giorgio
> > >
> > > <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> > > Libre
> > > de virus. www.avast.com
> > > <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > >
> > > 2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <
> simeon.aladjem@miracl.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > To the best of my understanding, the current problem with
> the project is
> > > > the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a
> different GitHub
> > > > organization.
> > > > I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention
> to make this
> > > > move was suspended.
> > > >
> > > > Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto
> code, which
> > > > doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a
> missive change
> > > > from the current one.
> > > > We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the
> project
> > > > code-base and repositories.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Simeon Aladjem
> > > > MIRACL
> > > >
> > > > On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
> > > >
> > > > Where do you want this project to go? I know from an
> IPMC standpoint,
> > > > I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <
> yamamoto.go@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am wondering why this project does not go. We have
> a set of MFA
> > > > server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually
> work fine. We
> > > > have been working for the code and are willing to donate the
> code. It
> > > > sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we should start from releasing the library
> part and fix the
> > > > API for the library.
> > > > > What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Go Yamamoto
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > > > > To: dev@milagro.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: State of Milagro
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was
> removed due to
> > > > questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> > > > >
> > > > > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the
> questions
> > > > raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign
> off on your
> > > > report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
Nikolai Stoilov
NOC/Support Team Lead
MIRACL
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Ok, thanks for clarifying those items.
The reason I was originally stopping by was due to lack of report. Any update on a report?
John
On 2017-11-08 03:19, Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com> wrote:
> The issue was that newest crypto code was initially published under https://github.com/milagro-crypto/milagro-crypto-c, but it will be moved to https://github.com/apache.
>
> Simeon
>
> On 8/11/17, 04:47, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2017-11-07 05:18, Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com> wrote:
> > No, exactly the opposite!
> > The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the project can continue as it should.
> > Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.
>
> Which issue are you referring to?
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Simeon Aladjem
> >
> > On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> > this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
> > BR,
> > Giorgio
> >
> > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> > Libre
> > de virus. www.avast.com
> > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >
> > 2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is
> > > the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub
> > > organization.
> > > I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this
> > > move was suspended.
> > >
> > > Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which
> > > doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change
> > > from the current one.
> > > We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project
> > > code-base and repositories.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Simeon Aladjem
> > > MIRACL
> > >
> > > On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
> > >
> > > Where do you want this project to go? I know from an IPMC standpoint,
> > > I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <ya...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am wondering why this project does not go. We have a set of MFA
> > > server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine. We
> > > have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code. It
> > > sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> > > >
> > > > I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the
> > > API for the library.
> > > > What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Go Yamamoto
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > > > To: dev@milagro.apache.org
> > > > Subject: State of Milagro
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
> > > questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> > > >
> > > > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions
> > > raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your
> > > report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>.
The issue was that newest crypto code was initially published under https://github.com/milagro-crypto/milagro-crypto-c, but it will be moved to https://github.com/apache.
Simeon
On 8/11/17, 04:47, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
On 2017-11-07 05:18, Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com> wrote:
> No, exactly the opposite!
> The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the project can continue as it should.
> Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.
Which issue are you referring to?
>
> Thanks,
> Simeon Aladjem
>
> On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
> this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
> BR,
> Giorgio
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Libre
> de virus. www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> 2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is
> > the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub
> > organization.
> > I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this
> > move was suspended.
> >
> > Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which
> > doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change
> > from the current one.
> > We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project
> > code-base and repositories.
> >
> > Best,
> > Simeon Aladjem
> > MIRACL
> >
> > On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
> >
> > Where do you want this project to go? I know from an IPMC standpoint,
> > I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <ya...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am wondering why this project does not go. We have a set of MFA
> > server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine. We
> > have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code. It
> > sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> > >
> > > I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the
> > API for the library.
> > > What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Go Yamamoto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > > To: dev@milagro.apache.org
> > > Subject: State of Milagro
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
> > questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> > >
> > > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions
> > raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your
> > report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On 2017-11-07 05:18, Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com> wrote:
> No, exactly the opposite!
> The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the project can continue as it should.
> Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.
Which issue are you referring to?
>
> Thanks,
> Simeon Aladjem
>
> On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
> this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
> BR,
> Giorgio
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Libre
> de virus. www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> 2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is
> > the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub
> > organization.
> > I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this
> > move was suspended.
> >
> > Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which
> > doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change
> > from the current one.
> > We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project
> > code-base and repositories.
> >
> > Best,
> > Simeon Aladjem
> > MIRACL
> >
> > On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
> >
> > Where do you want this project to go? I know from an IPMC standpoint,
> > I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <ya...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am wondering why this project does not go. We have a set of MFA
> > server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine. We
> > have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code. It
> > sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> > >
> > > I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the
> > API for the library.
> > > What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Go Yamamoto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > > To: dev@milagro.apache.org
> > > Subject: State of Milagro
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
> > questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> > >
> > > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions
> > raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your
> > report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>.
No, exactly the opposite!
The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the project can continue as it should.
Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.
Thanks,
Simeon Aladjem
On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everybody,
this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
BR,
Giorgio
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre
de virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>:
> Hello,
>
> To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is
> the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub
> organization.
> I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this
> move was suspended.
>
> Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which
> doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change
> from the current one.
> We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project
> code-base and repositories.
>
> Best,
> Simeon Aladjem
> MIRACL
>
> On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
>
> Where do you want this project to go? I know from an IPMC standpoint,
> I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
>
> John
>
> On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <ya...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wondering why this project does not go. We have a set of MFA
> server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine. We
> have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code. It
> sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> >
> > I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the
> API for the library.
> > What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Go Yamamoto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > To: dev@milagro.apache.org
> > Subject: State of Milagro
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
> questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> >
> > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions
> raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your
> report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by Giorgio Zoppi <gi...@gmail.com>.
Hello everybody,
this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
BR,
Giorgio
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre
de virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>:
> Hello,
>
> To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is
> the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub
> organization.
> I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this
> move was suspended.
>
> Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which
> doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change
> from the current one.
> We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project
> code-base and repositories.
>
> Best,
> Simeon Aladjem
> MIRACL
>
> On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
>
> Where do you want this project to go? I know from an IPMC standpoint,
> I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
>
> John
>
> On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <ya...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wondering why this project does not go. We have a set of MFA
> server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine. We
> have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code. It
> sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> >
> > I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the
> API for the library.
> > What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Go Yamamoto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > To: dev@milagro.apache.org
> > Subject: State of Milagro
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
> questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> >
> > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions
> raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your
> report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by Simeon Aladjem <si...@miracl.com>.
Hello,
To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub organization.
I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this move was suspended.
Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change from the current one.
We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project code-base and repositories.
Best,
Simeon Aladjem
MIRACL
On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
Where do you want this project to go? I know from an IPMC standpoint, I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
John
On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <ya...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering why this project does not go. We have a set of MFA server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine. We have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code. It sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
>
> I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the API for the library.
> What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
>
> Regards,
> Go Yamamoto
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> To: dev@milagro.apache.org
> Subject: State of Milagro
>
> Hi All,
>
> Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
>
> The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
>
> John
>
>
>
Re: RE: State of Milagro
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
Where do you want this project to go? I know from an IPMC standpoint, I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
John
On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <ya...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering why this project does not go. We have a set of MFA server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine. We have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code. It sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
>
> I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the API for the library.
> What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
>
> Regards,
> Go Yamamoto
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> To: dev@milagro.apache.org
> Subject: State of Milagro
>
> Hi All,
>
> Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
>
> The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
>
> John
>
>
>
RE: State of Milagro
Posted by Go Yamamoto <ya...@lab.ntt.co.jp>.
Hi,
I am wondering why this project does not go. We have a set of MFA server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine. We have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code. It sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the API for the library.
What is the blocker? Should we restart the project?
Regards,
Go Yamamoto
-----Original Message-----
From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndament@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
To: dev@milagro.apache.org
Subject: State of Milagro
Hi All,
Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your report explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
John
Re: State of Milagro
Posted by Giorgio Zoppi <gi...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
in merit to the status, i would like to know information about the milagro
server, just clone this.
It might be an area of my personal interest. Some tech question.
Why did you choose the lovely Python? Can be this done in cpp/java?
Second question..
Any docs on RPS? which is the roadmap for the milagro server ? Do you have
any server issues to solve?
BR,
Giiorgio
2017-10-29 11:34 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> Hi All,
>
> Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
> questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
>
> The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions raised by
> Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your report
> explicitly. You cannot add their sign off.
>
> John
>