You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Matthieu Morel <mm...@apache.org> on 2012/08/07 13:36:59 UTC
{RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Hi,
The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
vote deadline:
+1: 7 (5 binding)
-1: 0
Details:
+1 IPMC:
acmurthy, phunt
+1 PPMC
kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
+1 wider community
Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
websites and send announcements.
Matthieu
(* voted on s4-dev list)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Posted by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org>.
For the IPMC, just leave the vote open for at least 72 hours with no
specific close time. I might have time to look at it this afternoon for
your 3rd IPMC if no one beats me to it.
On Aug 8, 2012 2:48 AM, "Matthieu Morel" <mm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 8/7/12 4:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> > On 08/07/2012 06:36 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
> >> vote deadline:
> >>
> >> +1: 7 (5 binding)
> >> -1: 0
> >>
> >> Details:
> >>
> >> +1 IPMC:
> >> acmurthy, phunt
> >>
> >> +1 PPMC
> >> kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
> >>
> >> +1 wider community
> >> Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
> >>
> >> I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
> >> websites and send announcements.
> >>
> >> Matthieu
> >>
> >
> > Best I know, you need three IPMC votes for it to pass.
>
> Thanks for outlining the missing IPMC vote Flavio, thanks for the
> clarification Richard, and sorry all for my misinterpretation and for the
> noise on this list.
>
> It seems that typically mentors vote for releases, and that counts as IPMC
> votes, unfortunately we now only have 2 mentors for S4 (both +1'ed).
>
> At this point, I believe that we should ask for another IPMC to vote for
> the release, by sending a specific vote request, even though the vote
> expired, is this correct? Should we set a timeframe for the vote (I don't
> see that in previous similar requests)?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Matthieu
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org<ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**org<ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>
>
Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Posted by Matthieu Morel <mm...@apache.org>.
Hello,
On 8/7/12 4:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 06:36 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
>> vote deadline:
>>
>> +1: 7 (5 binding)
>> -1: 0
>>
>> Details:
>>
>> +1 IPMC:
>> acmurthy, phunt
>>
>> +1 PPMC
>> kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
>>
>> +1 wider community
>> Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
>>
>>
>> Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
>>
>> I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
>> websites and send announcements.
>>
>> Matthieu
>>
>
> Best I know, you need three IPMC votes for it to pass.
Thanks for outlining the missing IPMC vote Flavio, thanks for the
clarification Richard, and sorry all for my misinterpretation and for
the noise on this list.
It seems that typically mentors vote for releases, and that counts as
IPMC votes, unfortunately we now only have 2 mentors for S4 (both +1'ed).
At this point, I believe that we should ask for another IPMC to vote for
the release, by sending a specific vote request, even though the vote
expired, is this correct? Should we set a timeframe for the vote (I
don't see that in previous similar requests)?
Thanks,
Matthieu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Posted by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org>.
On 08/07/2012 06:36 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
> vote deadline:
>
> +1: 7 (5 binding)
> -1: 0
>
> Details:
>
> +1 IPMC:
> acmurthy, phunt
>
> +1 PPMC
> kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
>
> +1 wider community
> Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
>
>
> Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
>
> I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
> websites and send announcements.
>
> Matthieu
>
Best I know, you need three IPMC votes for it to pass.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 12 August 2012 11:20, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2012, at 12:09 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need 3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps comes from this sentence in the podling release management manual:
>>>
>>> "The vote passes if there are at least 3 +1's from the PPMC/IPMC members and more +1's than -1's. "
>>
>> Where exactly is this info?
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> Under Glossary/Release manager.
>
OK, I see.
However, if you read on further, the text calls for another vote on
the general incubator list.
I agree that it is not very clear ... I've added a bit more info which
hopefully clarifies it.
>>
>>> which can be interpreted as 3 +1 votes from either PPMC or IPMC. Some e-mail threads on archive indicate that it is not this way, though, and we need 3 +1 IPMC votes. Could anyone clarify, please?
>>
>> PPMC votes don't count; only IPMC votes count when voting on a
>> release. [Other types of vote may have different rules.]
>> This is because releases are made on behalf of the ASF, and only the
>> IPMC is an official ASF committee.
>>
>
> Got it, thanks!
>
>> See:
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
>
> -Flavio
>
>>
>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>> On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
>>>> vote deadline:
>>>>
>>>> +1: 7 (5 binding)
>>>> -1: 0
>>>>
>>>> Details:
>>>>
>>>> +1 IPMC:
>>>> acmurthy, phunt
>>>>
>>>> +1 PPMC
>>>> kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
>>>>
>>>> +1 wider community
>>>> Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
>>>>
>>>> I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
>>>> websites and send announcements.
>>>>
>>>> Matthieu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (* voted on s4-dev list)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com>.
On Aug 12, 2012, at 12:09 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need 3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps comes from this sentence in the podling release management manual:
>>
>> "The vote passes if there are at least 3 +1's from the PPMC/IPMC members and more +1's than -1's. "
>
> Where exactly is this info?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
Under Glossary/Release manager.
>
>> which can be interpreted as 3 +1 votes from either PPMC or IPMC. Some e-mail threads on archive indicate that it is not this way, though, and we need 3 +1 IPMC votes. Could anyone clarify, please?
>
> PPMC votes don't count; only IPMC votes count when voting on a
> release. [Other types of vote may have different rules.]
> This is because releases are made on behalf of the ASF, and only the
> IPMC is an official ASF committee.
>
Got it, thanks!
> See:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
Thanks for the pointer.
-Flavio
>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
>>> vote deadline:
>>>
>>> +1: 7 (5 binding)
>>> -1: 0
>>>
>>> Details:
>>>
>>> +1 IPMC:
>>> acmurthy, phunt
>>>
>>> +1 PPMC
>>> kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
>>>
>>> +1 wider community
>>> Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
>>>
>>> I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
>>> websites and send announcements.
>>>
>>> Matthieu
>>>
>>>
>>> (* voted on s4-dev list)
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 7 August 2012 14:42, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need 3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps comes from this sentence in the podling release management manual:
>
> "The vote passes if there are at least 3 +1's from the PPMC/IPMC members and more +1's than -1's. "
Where exactly is this info?
> which can be interpreted as 3 +1 votes from either PPMC or IPMC. Some e-mail threads on archive indicate that it is not this way, though, and we need 3 +1 IPMC votes. Could anyone clarify, please?
PPMC votes don't count; only IPMC votes count when voting on a
release. [Other types of vote may have different rules.]
This is because releases are made on behalf of the ASF, and only the
IPMC is an official ASF committee.
See:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> -Flavio
>
> On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
>> vote deadline:
>>
>> +1: 7 (5 binding)
>> -1: 0
>>
>> Details:
>>
>> +1 IPMC:
>> acmurthy, phunt
>>
>> +1 PPMC
>> kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
>>
>> +1 wider community
>> Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
>>
>>
>> Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
>>
>> I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
>> websites and send announcements.
>>
>> Matthieu
>>
>>
>> (* voted on s4-dev list)
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Posted by Matthieu Morel <mm...@apache.org>.
On 8/12/12 3:19 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> The vote did not pass, and he reopened it already. The vote was shy by 1
> binding IPMC vote. I gave it a binding +1 a couple of days ago. It
> should be good now, it just needs another result message, this time
> showing the 3 IPMC votes.
Yes, and thanks Richard for helping here! Following your suggestion, I
had reopened the vote "for at least 72 hours with no specific close
time". I'll post the updated results tomorrow (monday).
Regards,
Matthieu
>
> On Aug 12, 2012 4:50 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fpj@yahoo-inc.com
> <ma...@yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message,
> we need 3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The
> confusing perhaps comes from this sentence in the podling release
> management manual:
>
> "The vote passes if there are at least 3 +1's from the PPMC/IPMC
> members and more +1's than -1's. "
>
> which can be interpreted as 3 +1 votes from either PPMC or IPMC.
> Some e-mail threads on archive indicate that it is not this way,
> though, and we need 3 +1 IPMC votes. Could anyone clarify, please?
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
> > vote deadline:
> >
> > +1: 7 (5 binding)
> > -1: 0
> >
> > Details:
> >
> > +1 IPMC:
> > acmurthy, phunt
> >
> > +1 PPMC
> > kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
> >
> > +1 wider community
> > Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
> >
> >
> > Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
> >
> > I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
> > websites and send announcements.
> >
> > Matthieu
> >
> >
> > (* voted on s4-dev list)
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> <ma...@incubator.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> <ma...@incubator.apache.org>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Posted by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org>.
The vote did not pass, and he reopened it already. The vote was shy by 1
binding IPMC vote. I gave it a binding +1 a couple of days ago. It should
be good now, it just needs another result message, this time showing the 3
IPMC votes.
On Aug 12, 2012 4:50 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fp...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need
> 3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps
> comes from this sentence in the podling release management manual:
>
> "The vote passes if there are at least 3 +1's from the PPMC/IPMC members
> and more +1's than -1's. "
>
> which can be interpreted as 3 +1 votes from either PPMC or IPMC. Some
> e-mail threads on archive indicate that it is not this way, though, and we
> need 3 +1 IPMC votes. Could anyone clarify, please?
>
> -Flavio
>
> On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
> > vote deadline:
> >
> > +1: 7 (5 binding)
> > -1: 0
> >
> > Details:
> >
> > +1 IPMC:
> > acmurthy, phunt
> >
> > +1 PPMC
> > kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
> >
> > +1 wider community
> > Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
> >
> >
> > Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
> >
> > I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
> > websites and send announcements.
> >
> > Matthieu
> >
> >
> > (* voted on s4-dev list)
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: {RESULT] [VOTE] S4 0.5.0 Release Candidate 1
Posted by Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo-inc.com>.
I'm not sure the vote passed. According to Patrick Hunt's message, we need 3 +1 IPMC votes, and we only have 2 +1 IPMC votes. The confusing perhaps comes from this sentence in the podling release management manual:
"The vote passes if there are at least 3 +1's from the PPMC/IPMC members and more +1's than -1's. "
which can be interpreted as 3 +1 votes from either PPMC or IPMC. Some e-mail threads on archive indicate that it is not this way, though, and we need 3 +1 IPMC votes. Could anyone clarify, please?
-Flavio
On Aug 7, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The vote for this S4 release passed with the following results at the
> vote deadline:
>
> +1: 7 (5 binding)
> -1: 0
>
> Details:
>
> +1 IPMC:
> acmurthy, phunt
>
> +1 PPMC
> kishoreg*, leoneu*, fpj
>
> +1 wider community
> Daniel Gomez, Karthik Kambatla
>
>
> Thanks to all the participants to the voting process!
>
> I'll now publish the artifacts, and after the sync delay, update the
> websites and send announcements.
>
> Matthieu
>
>
> (* voted on s4-dev list)
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org