You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2015/03/17 18:18:03 UTC

release for tomee?

Hi guys,

I'd love to get an openjpa release with the fix Mark commited yesterday (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2573). Idea is to get rid of
tomee "fork".

Having https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2511 would be a very
nice to have as well - makes tomee lighter.

So to summarize I'd like to get a release with these fixes/constraints:
- OPENJPA-2573
- OPENJPA-2511
- JPA 2.0
- based on 2.4 and not 2.3 (or at least with 2.4 fixes/enhancements)
- asm5 shade support

Do you think it is possible in a reasonable time? Happy to test with a
snapshot to validate on tomee side we don't have regressions.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

Re: release for tomee?

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.

Yes sure, happy to help!

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 01.04.2015 um 20:43 schrieb Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>:
> 
> Hi Romain,
> I don't see an issue with creating another OpenJPA release.  Mark is an OpenJPA committer, has done OpenJPA releases in the past, and is at least semi-involved with TomEE.  Maybe he would be interested in helping out this cause?
> 
> Thanks, Kevin
> 
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I'd love to get an openjpa release with the fix Mark commited yesterday (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2573). Idea is to get rid of
> tomee "fork".
> 
> Having https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2511 would be a very
> nice to have as well - makes tomee lighter.
> 
> So to summarize I'd like to get a release with these fixes/constraints:
> - OPENJPA-2573
> - OPENJPA-2511
> - JPA 2.0
> - based on 2.4 and not 2.3 (or at least with 2.4 fixes/enhancements)
> - asm5 shade support
> 
> Do you think it is possible in a reasonable time? Happy to test with a
> snapshot to validate on tomee side we don't have regressions.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>

Re: release for tomee?

Posted by Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>.

Hi Romain,
I don't see an issue with creating another OpenJPA release.  Mark is an
OpenJPA committer, has done OpenJPA releases in the past, and is at least
semi-involved with TomEE.  Maybe he would be interested in helping out this
cause?

Thanks, Kevin

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I'd love to get an openjpa release with the fix Mark commited yesterday (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2573). Idea is to get rid of
> tomee "fork".
>
> Having https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2511 would be a very
> nice to have as well - makes tomee lighter.
>
> So to summarize I'd like to get a release with these fixes/constraints:
> - OPENJPA-2573
> - OPENJPA-2511
> - JPA 2.0
> - based on 2.4 and not 2.3 (or at least with 2.4 fixes/enhancements)
> - asm5 shade support
>
> Do you think it is possible in a reasonable time? Happy to test with a
> snapshot to validate on tomee side we don't have regressions.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>