You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> on 2007/04/08 16:56:48 UTC

why still so many includes for terracotta?

http://chillenious.wordpress.com/2007/04/07/terracotta-supports-subtype-expressions/

if we have IClusterable then pretty much only that one needs to be included
shouldn't it?

johan

Re: why still so many includes for terracotta?

Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.

Like I said in that article, the configuration probably can be
optimized further - I haven't looked at it closely - but this is
something that works for at least most of the examples. I don't
remember which issues still existed. Maybe Matej can tell.

Eelco

On 4/8/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://chillenious.wordpress.com/2007/04/07/terracotta-supports-subtype-expressions/
>
> if we have IClusterable then pretty much only that one needs to be included
> shouldn't it?
>
> johan
>