Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?

[Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>]

Hey, I noticed that fisheye6 is service pages now, but the
geronimo_server repository is marked as stopped.

Is this repo still syncing?

--jason


On 3/29/07, Conor MacNeill <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'll start with the Server project and see how we go from there. I'll start
> on the weekend. At the throttled rate, I assume it will take more than the
> weekend to index. Let me know if you are happy to let it run on at the
> throttled rate or you want me to restrict it to weekends.
>
> All Apache FishEye instances are now on a dedicated FishEye instance
> http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/
>
> I've set up the project definition just now but it is not enabled yet.
>
> We set the refresh period to 2 hours for Apache repos, keep the restrictive
> throttle in place and prohibit all robots so the load after initial scan
> should be quite small - Joe can give a better picture.
>
> Conor
>
>
>
> On 30/03/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >
> > > Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> writes:
> > >
> > >> Cool!  Many thanks.  Please let us know what the URL is once it
> > >> has been setup.
> > >>
> > >> AFAIK Infra is cool with this, I've not heard any objections as of
> > >> yet.
> > >
> > > Actually I'd prefer it if Conor started with
> > >
> > >   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/
> > >
> > > because /geronimo itself contains multiple projects,
> > > and we may need to go back to disallowing checkouts
> > > of /geronimo.
> >
> > That is fine with me for the initial setup... though really it would
> > be good to get fisheye to give us a view over the entire project repo.
> >
> >   * * *
> >
> > Aside from the first scan of the repo... is there much overhead after
> > it has been setup?  I mean after the first sync, would it matter so
> > much that its
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server or
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo ?
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
>
>

Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?

[Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>]

Cool!  Many thanks :-)

--jason


On Apr 10, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote:

> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Okay, thanks for the update.
>>
>
> It's done now - let me know of any issues.
>
> Conor

Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?

[Conor MacNeill <co...@apache.org>]

Jason Dillon wrote:
> Okay, thanks for the update.
> 

It's done now - let me know of any issues.

Conor

Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?

[Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>]

Okay, thanks for the update.

--jason


On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:43 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote:

> Jason Dillon wrote:
>> Hey, I noticed that fisheye6 is service pages now, but the
>> geronimo_server repository is marked as stopped.
>>
>> Is this repo still syncing?
>>
>
> Actually I stopped it. I attempted to set up the repo to import its
> state from the point where it was moved to the server dir.  
> Unfortunately
> some operations to Apache timed out.
>
> I decided to rework a few things to make this more robust. I should be
> able to retry next weekend.
>
> Conor

Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?

[Conor MacNeill <co...@apache.org>]

Jason Dillon wrote:
> Hey, I noticed that fisheye6 is service pages now, but the
> geronimo_server repository is marked as stopped.
> 
> Is this repo still syncing?
> 

Actually I stopped it. I attempted to set up the repo to import its
state from the point where it was moved to the server dir. Unfortunately
some operations to Apache timed out.

I decided to rework a few things to make this more robust. I should be
able to retry next weekend.

Conor