You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@roller.apache.org by djeddyg <ed...@mredd.co.uk> on 2009/03/02 14:11:23 UTC

Re: Issues using PlanetModel in a weblog.

Anyone? Please?


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Issues-using-PlanetModel-in-a-weblog.-tp22163251s12275p22287813.html
Sent from the Roller - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Issues using PlanetModel in a weblog.

Posted by Edd Grant <ed...@mredd.co.uk>.
Done: https://issues.apache.org/roller/browse/ROL-1793

Thanks,

Edd

2009/3/3 Dave <sn...@gmail.com>

> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:39 AM, djeddyg <ed...@mredd.co.uk> wrote:
> > Thanks for your response, do you want me to raise it as a bug against
> roller
> > so it can be investigated formally?
>
> Yes, that would be helpful.
>
> Thanks,
> - Dave
>
>
>
> > Dave Johnson-8 wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:11 AM, djeddyg <ed...@mredd.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> Anyone? Please?
> >>
> >> Hi Ed,
> >>
> >> I just tried your code on my blog with my Twitter feed (the Atom
> >> version) and it returned only 3 entries. I also checked in the Roller
> >> database and found only three entries in the feed. I checked the feed
> >> from Twitter (using wget) and found that it contains 20 entries, so
> >> something is clearly wrong.
> >>
> >> Something may have changed about Twitter's feeds, but it is odd that
> >> only the first couple of entries are being parsed -- usually when feed
> >> parser fails it fails completely.
> >>
> >> Thanks for pointing this out. When I get a chance I will investigate
> >> further.
> >>
> >> - Dave
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Issues-using-PlanetModel-in-a-weblog.-tp22163251s12275p22308789.html
> > Sent from the Roller - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>



-- 
Mobile: +44 (0) 7861 394 543
WWW: http://www.mredd.co.uk

Re: Issues using PlanetModel in a weblog.

Posted by Dave <sn...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:39 AM, djeddyg <ed...@mredd.co.uk> wrote:
> Thanks for your response, do you want me to raise it as a bug against roller
> so it can be investigated formally?

Yes, that would be helpful.

Thanks,
- Dave



> Dave Johnson-8 wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:11 AM, djeddyg <ed...@mredd.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Anyone? Please?
>>
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> I just tried your code on my blog with my Twitter feed (the Atom
>> version) and it returned only 3 entries. I also checked in the Roller
>> database and found only three entries in the feed. I checked the feed
>> from Twitter (using wget) and found that it contains 20 entries, so
>> something is clearly wrong.
>>
>> Something may have changed about Twitter's feeds, but it is odd that
>> only the first couple of entries are being parsed -- usually when feed
>> parser fails it fails completely.
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out. When I get a chance I will investigate
>> further.
>>
>> - Dave
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Issues-using-PlanetModel-in-a-weblog.-tp22163251s12275p22308789.html
> Sent from the Roller - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Re: Issues using PlanetModel in a weblog.

Posted by djeddyg <ed...@mredd.co.uk>.
Hi Dave,

Thanks for your response, do you want me to raise it as a bug against roller
so it can be investigated formally?

Cheers,

Edd



Dave Johnson-8 wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:11 AM, djeddyg <ed...@mredd.co.uk> wrote:
>> Anyone? Please?
> 
> Hi Ed,
> 
> I just tried your code on my blog with my Twitter feed (the Atom
> version) and it returned only 3 entries. I also checked in the Roller
> database and found only three entries in the feed. I checked the feed
> from Twitter (using wget) and found that it contains 20 entries, so
> something is clearly wrong.
> 
> Something may have changed about Twitter's feeds, but it is odd that
> only the first couple of entries are being parsed -- usually when feed
> parser fails it fails completely.
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out. When I get a chance I will investigate
> further.
> 
> - Dave
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Issues-using-PlanetModel-in-a-weblog.-tp22163251s12275p22308789.html
Sent from the Roller - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Issues using PlanetModel in a weblog.

Posted by Dave <sn...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:11 AM, djeddyg <ed...@mredd.co.uk> wrote:
> Anyone? Please?

Hi Ed,

I just tried your code on my blog with my Twitter feed (the Atom
version) and it returned only 3 entries. I also checked in the Roller
database and found only three entries in the feed. I checked the feed
from Twitter (using wget) and found that it contains 20 entries, so
something is clearly wrong.

Something may have changed about Twitter's feeds, but it is odd that
only the first couple of entries are being parsed -- usually when feed
parser fails it fails completely.

Thanks for pointing this out. When I get a chance I will investigate further.

- Dave