Using bzip2 for tarball

[GOMEZ Henri <hg...@slib.fr>]

Hi to all,

What about using the bzip2 format for tarball along
with gzip and zip format ?

It will save bytes and more important will fit better
with packaging recommandations of leading Linux distro.

Thanks for your opinion ! 

-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

Re: Using bzip2 for tarball

[Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>]

GOMEZ Henri <hg...@slib.fr> writes:

> What about using the bzip2 format for tarball along
> with gzip and zip format ?
>
> It will save bytes and more important will fit better
> with packaging recommandations of leading Linux distro.

You have my +1, though I would instead recommend using bzip2 instead
of gzip.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>