[GitHub] [iceberg] emkornfield commented on issue #3464: Types + Filesystem - custom implementations VS Arrow

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

emkornfield commented on issue #3464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/3464#issuecomment-965741827


   > However, strong agree that any new implementation should leverage arrow as much as possible and should strive to work with arrow community to shore up any functionality gaps(where it makes sense for their project to do so).
   
   Regarding Arrow, has there been any thought of developing lower level components for iceberg in C++ and have python bindings to them? I'm not sure what the best mode for collaboration but one example of cross project collaboration is the parquet C++ library is still technically under the Parquet PMC governance, but lives in the Arrow repo. At some point Arrow would like to have a C++ implementation for iceberg (at least I would like to see one).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org