You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-commits@incubator.apache.org by ma...@apache.org on 2006/07/20 03:58:10 UTC

svn commit: r423748 - /incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

Author: matzew
Date: Wed Jul 19 20:58:09 2006
New Revision: 423748

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=423748&view=rev
Log:
upgrade the archetype to myfaces 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT

Modified:
    incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

Modified: incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml?rev=423748&r1=423747&r2=423748&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml (original)
+++ incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml Wed Jul 19 20:58:09 2006
@@ -91,14 +91,14 @@
     <dependency>
       <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core</groupId>
       <artifactId>myfaces-api</artifactId>
-      <version>1.1.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
+      <version>1.1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
       <scope>compile</scope>
     </dependency>
 
     <dependency>
       <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core</groupId>
       <artifactId>myfaces-impl</artifactId>
-      <version>1.1.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
+      <version>1.1.5-SNAPSHOT</version>
       <scope>compile</scope>
     </dependency>

Re: svn commit: r423748 - /incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
On 7/19/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/19/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I assume this applies similarly to plugins?  So we should
> > rename, for instance, maven-faces-plugin to trinidad-faces-plugin.
>
> It doesn't seem to apply.  (I think it's too late for plugin naming
> conventions, archetypes are newer.)  Some examples of 'third party'
> plugins that I know of:
> * cargo-maven2-plugin
> * maven-taglib-plugin
>
> Is the plugin Trinidad-specific?  I don't know what it does, but
> 'maven-faces-plugin' sounds like it's useful for any project using JSF
> and building with Maven 2.  If that's true, then I'd keep the name.
> If it's something just for Trinidad, then I'd change it.  (Probably to
> 'trinidad-maven-plugin', though.)


Trinidad has a bunch of Maven plugins;  this one is (at least
potentially) applicable outside of Trinidad.

-- Adam



--
> Wendy
>

Re: svn commit: r423748 - /incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 7/19/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I assume this applies similarly to plugins?  So we should
> rename, for instance, maven-faces-plugin to trinidad-faces-plugin.

It doesn't seem to apply.  (I think it's too late for plugin naming
conventions, archetypes are newer.)  Some examples of 'third party'
plugins that I know of:
 * cargo-maven2-plugin
 * maven-taglib-plugin

Is the plugin Trinidad-specific?  I don't know what it does, but
'maven-faces-plugin' sounds like it's useful for any project using JSF
and building with Maven 2.  If that's true, then I'd keep the name.
If it's something just for Trinidad, then I'd change it.  (Probably to
'trinidad-maven-plugin', though.)

-- 
Wendy

Re: svn commit: r423748 - /incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
I assume this applies similarly to plugins?  So we should
rename, for instance, maven-faces-plugin to trinidad-faces-plugin.

-- Adam


On 7/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Sounds like a "usage of javax.***" restriction :)
> We will take care of that.
> Thanks!
>
> myfaces-archetype-trinidad sounds not well
> same for myfaces-archetype-tomahawk
>
> maybe we should use tomahawk-archetype-starter or simple
> tomahawk-archetype
>
> and trinidad ... and tobago ...
> :)
>
>
> > I got confirmation from Brett on dev@maven that the naming convention
> > should be <projectname>-archetype-<description>.
> >
> > In other words, the ones named maven-archetype-* are the ones that are
> > distributed *by* Maven as a project.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wendy
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>

Re: svn commit: r423748 - /incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Sounds like a "usage of javax.***" restriction :)
We will take care of that.
Thanks!

myfaces-archetype-trinidad sounds not well
same for myfaces-archetype-tomahawk

maybe we should use tomahawk-archetype-starter or simple tomahawk-archetype

and trinidad ... and tobago ...
:)


> I got confirmation from Brett on dev@maven that the naming convention
> should be <projectname>-archetype-<description>.
>
> In other words, the ones named maven-archetype-* are the ones that are
> distributed *by* Maven as a project.
>
> Thanks,
> Wendy
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: svn commit: r423748 - /incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 7/19/06, matzew@apache.org <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=423748&view=rev
> Log:
> upgrade the archetype to myfaces 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
>
> Modified:
>     incubator/adffaces/trunk/plugins/maven-adf-archetype/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml

When you rename this to trinidad, please change it to
'myfaces-archetype-trinidad' or something similar.

I got confirmation from Brett on dev@maven that the naming convention
should be <projectname>-archetype-<description>.

In other words, the ones named maven-archetype-* are the ones that are
distributed *by* Maven as a project.

Thanks,
Wendy