You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> on 2013/11/15 19:46:15 UTC
Rough plan for Tomcat 8
The major refactorings planned for 8.0.x are complete. There are a few
minor refactorings that can either done before the first stable release
or (if they turn out to be a little bigger) left until 9.0.x.
Therefore I have the following tentative plan in mind:
- start the next 8.0.x RC release process shortly
- release the next 8.0.x RC early next week
- allow a week or so for further testing
- wait to see if anything is badly broken
- fix what is broken
- if nothing is too badly broken, release 8.0.0-alpha
If everything thing goes to plan, we should have a 8.0.0-alpha by early
December.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: MBeanDeregistration test failure
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 17/11/2013 12:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/11/2013 21:31, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 16.11.2013 21:19, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>> On Nov 15, 2013, at 11:29 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On a related note, when I ran the unit tests last night I saw a
>>>> couple of intermittent failures that I'd like to try and get to
>>>> the bottom of before tagging the next RC.
>>>
>>> Is one of those org.apache.catalina.mbeans.TestRegistration? It has
>>> recently started failing for me in BIO mode and looks related to
>>> r1539452.
>>
>> Confirmed here, only failing for BIO. Fails in about 1/3 of the
>> runs.
>
> Yes, that is what I am seeing. I haven't had a chance to look at it
> further yet.
Thanks for the hints. This should be fixed now.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: MBeanDeregistration test failure
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 16/11/2013 21:31, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 16.11.2013 21:19, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> On Nov 15, 2013, at 11:29 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On a related note, when I ran the unit tests last night I saw a
>>> couple of intermittent failures that I'd like to try and get to
>>> the bottom of before tagging the next RC.
>>
>> Is one of those org.apache.catalina.mbeans.TestRegistration? It has
>> recently started failing for me in BIO mode and looks related to
>> r1539452.
>
> Confirmed here, only failing for BIO. Fails in about 1/3 of the
> runs.
Yes, that is what I am seeing. I haven't had a chance to look at it
further yet.
Mark
>
> Still registered MBean is:
>
> Name:
> Tomcat:type=RequestProcessor,worker="http-bio-127.0.0.1-auto-1-35854",name=HttpRequest1
>
>
modelerType: org.apache.tomcat.util.modeler.BaseModelMBean
> requestProcessingTime: 1384636195336 bytesSent: 0 rpName:
> Tomcat:type=RequestProcessor,worker="http-bio-127.0.0.1-auto-1-35854",name=HttpRequest1
>
>
processingTime: 621
> errorCount: 1 maxTime: 621 requestBytesReceived: 0 maxRequestUri: /
> stage: 1 lastRequestProcessingTime: 621 globalProcessor:
> org.apache.coyote.RequestGroupInfo@298da4 serverPort: -1
> bytesReceived: 0 requestCount: 1 requestBytesSent: 0 contentLength:
> -1 remoteAddr: 127.0.0.1
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: MBeanDeregistration test failure
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 16.11.2013 21:19, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2013, at 11:29 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On a related note, when I ran the unit tests last night I saw a couple of intermittent failures that I'd like to try and get to the bottom of before tagging the next RC.
>
> Is one of those org.apache.catalina.mbeans.TestRegistration? It has recently started failing for me in BIO mode and looks related to r1539452.
Confirmed here, only failing for BIO. Fails in about 1/3 of the runs.
Still registered MBean is:
Name:
Tomcat:type=RequestProcessor,worker="http-bio-127.0.0.1-auto-1-35854",name=HttpRequest1
modelerType: org.apache.tomcat.util.modeler.BaseModelMBean
requestProcessingTime: 1384636195336
bytesSent: 0
rpName:
Tomcat:type=RequestProcessor,worker="http-bio-127.0.0.1-auto-1-35854",name=HttpRequest1
processingTime: 621
errorCount: 1
maxTime: 621
requestBytesReceived: 0
maxRequestUri: /
stage: 1
lastRequestProcessingTime: 621
globalProcessor: org.apache.coyote.RequestGroupInfo@298da4
serverPort: -1
bytesReceived: 0
requestCount: 1
requestBytesSent: 0
contentLength: -1
remoteAddr: 127.0.0.1
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
MBeanDeregistration test failure
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
On Nov 15, 2013, at 11:29 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On a related note, when I ran the unit tests last night I saw a couple of intermittent failures that I'd like to try and get to the bottom of before tagging the next RC.
Is one of those org.apache.catalina.mbeans.TestRegistration? It has recently started failing for me in BIO mode and looks related to r1539452.
Thanks
Jeremy
Re: Rough plan for Tomcat 8
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
"Rémy Maucherat" <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>2013/11/15 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>
>> The major refactorings planned for 8.0.x are complete. There are a
>few
>> minor refactorings that can either done before the first stable
>release
>> or (if they turn out to be a little bigger) left until 9.0.x.
>>
> Cool. Since there was never a 7.1, I suppose there will be no 8.1
>either,
>but instead feature additions here and there in the 8.0 branch ?
My personal preference is to add features to 8.0.x but an invasive new feature or a significant delay in Java EE 8 are two things that would make an 8.1.x branch more likely. At this point most of the ideas I have are more around refactoring than new features and those could wait until 9.0.x
On a related note, when I ran the unit tests last night I saw a couple of intermittent failures that I'd like to try and get to the bottom of before tagging the next RC.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Rough plan for Tomcat 8
Posted by Rémy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>.
2013/11/15 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
> The major refactorings planned for 8.0.x are complete. There are a few
> minor refactorings that can either done before the first stable release
> or (if they turn out to be a little bigger) left until 9.0.x.
>
> Cool. Since there was never a 7.1, I suppose there will be no 8.1 either,
but instead feature additions here and there in the 8.0 branch ?
Rémy