You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> on 2018/02/08 10:57:26 UTC
Re: Canvas
(moving to dev list)
Hi I think this is a good tip that we can add to our Royale Blog in the
"Examples" category. And respect the user (ni this case Peter) as the
poster.
What do you think?
2018-02-06 15:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for looking into Apache Royale!
>
> As you know, mx:Canvas lets you place items using (x,y) positioning. You
> can do the same thing using either js:Group or js:Container with
> js:BasicLayout.
>
> js:Group is much lighter in weight then js:Container when running the app
> in the Flash Player; in the browser they are equivalent. js:Container can
> be made to scroll and js:Group cannot.
>
> If you do not need scrolling, use js:Group:
>
> <js:Group>
> <js:beads>
> <js:BasicLayout />
> </js:beads>
> <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height attributes ‹>
> </js:Group>
>
> If you do need scrolling, then you would use:
>
> <js:Container>
> <js:beads>
> <js:BasicLayout />
> <js:ScrollingViewport />
> </js:beads>
> <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height attributes ‹>
> </js:Container>
>
> Regards,
> Peter Ent
> Adobe Systems/Apache Royale Project
>
>
> On 2/6/18, 4:46 AM, "Alina Kazi" <al...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am using mx:Canvas and porting my app to Apache Flexjs/Royale I can't
> >find
> >any substitute of it.
> >
> >Kindly let me know if there is any other alternate for similar
> >functionality.
> >
> >
> >
> >Aleena
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Canvas
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
IMO, the Express set should have a Canvas component that bundles those
beads. I challenge someone besides Peter and me to create it!
Thanks,
-Alex
On 2/8/18, 3:13 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
>So cool :)
>Hope Peter could let us know what he thinks as well as well with the new
>thread I just open about examples blog :)
>
>2018-02-08 12:06 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Absolutely. I am also going to include this in the help docs list of
>> features that you do one way in Flex and slightly differently in Royale.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > (moving to dev list)
>> >
>> > Hi I think this is a good tip that we can add to our Royale Blog in
>>the
>> > "Examples" category. And respect the user (ni this case Peter) as the
>> > poster.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > 2018-02-06 15:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com>:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for looking into Apache Royale!
>> > >
>> > > As you know, mx:Canvas lets you place items using (x,y) positioning.
>> You
>> > > can do the same thing using either js:Group or js:Container with
>> > > js:BasicLayout.
>> > >
>> > > js:Group is much lighter in weight then js:Container when running
>>the
>> app
>> > > in the Flash Player; in the browser they are equivalent.
>>js:Container
>> can
>> > > be made to scroll and js:Group cannot.
>> > >
>> > > If you do not need scrolling, use js:Group:
>> > >
>> > > <js:Group>
>> > > <js:beads>
>> > > <js:BasicLayout />
>> > > </js:beads>
>> > > <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height
>>attributes
>> ‹>
>> > > </js:Group>
>> > >
>> > > If you do need scrolling, then you would use:
>> > >
>> > > <js:Container>
>> > > <js:beads>
>> > > <js:BasicLayout />
>> > > <js:ScrollingViewport />
>> > > </js:beads>
>> > > <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height
>>attributes
>> ‹>
>> > > </js:Container>
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Peter Ent
>> > > Adobe Systems/Apache Royale Project
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 2/6/18, 4:46 AM, "Alina Kazi" <al...@d-bz.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > >I am using mx:Canvas and porting my app to Apache Flexjs/Royale I
>> can't
>> > > >find
>> > > >any substitute of it.
>> > > >
>> > > >Kindly let me know if there is any other alternate for similar
>> > > >functionality.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >Aleena
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> >
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%
>>2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C26a9a2644e9c491092af08
>>d56ee50f38%7C71f1da39c0a84d5a8d88a67b23c30bf4%7C0%7C0%7C63653685246919203
>>6&sdata=S3KwHgvUwpW5STJ%2BJb41%2Fe9j%2FcBDUz2s4ZjRuyDLDcg%3D&reserved=0
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Wetmore
>>
>>
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14
>>.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C26a9a2644e9c491092af
>>08d56ee50f38%7C71f1da39c0a84d5a8d88a67b23c30bf4%7C0%7C0%7C636536852469192
>>036&sdata=ZdjtTBAGw55JysGANyB2zeOsksP0y%2BCTH2sCW8GuamA%3D&reserved=0
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Carlos Rovira
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2
>Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C26a9a2644e9c491092af08d5
>6ee50f38%7C71f1da39c0a84d5a8d88a67b23c30bf4%7C0%7C0%7C636536852469192036&s
>data=S3KwHgvUwpW5STJ%2BJb41%2Fe9j%2FcBDUz2s4ZjRuyDLDcg%3D&reserved=0
Re: Canvas
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
So cool :)
Hope Peter could let us know what he thinks as well as well with the new
thread I just open about examples blog :)
2018-02-08 12:06 GMT+01:00 Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>:
> Absolutely. I am also going to include this in the help docs list of
> features that you do one way in Flex and slightly differently in Royale.
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > (moving to dev list)
> >
> > Hi I think this is a good tip that we can add to our Royale Blog in the
> > "Examples" category. And respect the user (ni this case Peter) as the
> > poster.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > 2018-02-06 15:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for looking into Apache Royale!
> > >
> > > As you know, mx:Canvas lets you place items using (x,y) positioning.
> You
> > > can do the same thing using either js:Group or js:Container with
> > > js:BasicLayout.
> > >
> > > js:Group is much lighter in weight then js:Container when running the
> app
> > > in the Flash Player; in the browser they are equivalent. js:Container
> can
> > > be made to scroll and js:Group cannot.
> > >
> > > If you do not need scrolling, use js:Group:
> > >
> > > <js:Group>
> > > <js:beads>
> > > <js:BasicLayout />
> > > </js:beads>
> > > <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height attributes
> ‹>
> > > </js:Group>
> > >
> > > If you do need scrolling, then you would use:
> > >
> > > <js:Container>
> > > <js:beads>
> > > <js:BasicLayout />
> > > <js:ScrollingViewport />
> > > </js:beads>
> > > <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height attributes
> ‹>
> > > </js:Container>
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Peter Ent
> > > Adobe Systems/Apache Royale Project
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/6/18, 4:46 AM, "Alina Kazi" <al...@d-bz.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hi,
> > > >
> > > >I am using mx:Canvas and porting my app to Apache Flexjs/Royale I
> can't
> > > >find
> > > >any substitute of it.
> > > >
> > > >Kindly let me know if there is any other alternate for similar
> > > >functionality.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Aleena
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: Canvas
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
Absolutely. I am also going to include this in the help docs list of
features that you do one way in Flex and slightly differently in Royale.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 6:57 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
wrote:
> (moving to dev list)
>
> Hi I think this is a good tip that we can add to our Royale Blog in the
> "Examples" category. And respect the user (ni this case Peter) as the
> poster.
>
> What do you think?
>
> 2018-02-06 15:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <pe...@adobe.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for looking into Apache Royale!
> >
> > As you know, mx:Canvas lets you place items using (x,y) positioning. You
> > can do the same thing using either js:Group or js:Container with
> > js:BasicLayout.
> >
> > js:Group is much lighter in weight then js:Container when running the app
> > in the Flash Player; in the browser they are equivalent. js:Container can
> > be made to scroll and js:Group cannot.
> >
> > If you do not need scrolling, use js:Group:
> >
> > <js:Group>
> > <js:beads>
> > <js:BasicLayout />
> > </js:beads>
> > <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height attributes ‹>
> > </js:Group>
> >
> > If you do need scrolling, then you would use:
> >
> > <js:Container>
> > <js:beads>
> > <js:BasicLayout />
> > <js:ScrollingViewport />
> > </js:beads>
> > <!‹ place your elements here using x, y, width, height attributes ‹>
> > </js:Container>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Peter Ent
> > Adobe Systems/Apache Royale Project
> >
> >
> > On 2/6/18, 4:46 AM, "Alina Kazi" <al...@d-bz.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I am using mx:Canvas and porting my app to Apache Flexjs/Royale I can't
> > >find
> > >any substitute of it.
> > >
> > >Kindly let me know if there is any other alternate for similar
> > >functionality.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Aleena
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/