You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com> on 2006/11/17 19:18:11 UTC
[build-test] Tracking platforms and architecure for CI
I put a wiki page up :
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Automated_Testing
(reachable from the front page) to capture how we track and govern the
"community CI" effort that build-test is intended to be.
So I didn't set out any rules other than someone who's interested has to
approach the community (we do gatekeep as we need to manually let mail
through to -commits) and note that we reserve the right to refuse anyone.
Right now, there's a table that lists the CI going on at IBM. Once
Vladimir's machine is sending mail through, we'll add that, and we'll
add the build-test running on my x86_64/Ubuntu6 when that's working.
geir
Re: [build-test] Tracking platforms and architecure for CI
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Ok - this is spooky - my mailer reports that you sent(?) this at 5:33am
> on 11/20. I believe this. However, I wouldn't have not read this until
> this morning (now == 7:10am, 11/21) if I had it yesterday.
>
> I'll assume that your mail system is working fine, and that there's
> something on my end that's causing this delay. However, just to be
> sure, has anyone else seen strange delays like this?
I also think I sent it at 10:33GMT, and received it back at 10:36GMT.
The archive [1] also saw it at that time.
Good luck.
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200611.mbox/raw/%3c45618460.6060101@gmail.com%3e
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
Re: [build-test] Tracking platforms and architecure for CI
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>> Alexei Fedotov wrote:
>>> I like the idea. I dream of times when Harmony testing process becomes
>>> dynamically distributed among active members [1], [2].
>>>
>>> Ok, back to the ground. Can we be more precise about OS versions? It
>>> happened several times when a patch behaved differently on a different
>>> Linux.
>> Oh - yes, the intention is that "operating system" is
>>
>> Ubunutu 6.05
>> Fedora Core x.y
>> SLES 9.z
>> Windows XP SP 2
>>
>> etc
>>
>> I just put "linux" because I really have no clue what IBM is running.
>
> I've updated it a bit, let me know if you think of more versions to
> report (e.g. binutils?)
>
Thanks - I saw that.
Ok - this is spooky - my mailer reports that you sent(?) this at 5:33am
on 11/20. I believe this. However, I wouldn't have not read this until
this morning (now == 7:10am, 11/21) if I had it yesterday.
I'll assume that your mail system is working fine, and that there's
something on my end that's causing this delay. However, just to be
sure, has anyone else seen strange delays like this?
geir
Re: [build-test] Tracking platforms and architecure for CI
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Alexei Fedotov wrote:
>> I like the idea. I dream of times when Harmony testing process becomes
>> dynamically distributed among active members [1], [2].
>>
>> Ok, back to the ground. Can we be more precise about OS versions? It
>> happened several times when a patch behaved differently on a different
>> Linux.
>
> Oh - yes, the intention is that "operating system" is
>
> Ubunutu 6.05
> Fedora Core x.y
> SLES 9.z
> Windows XP SP 2
>
> etc
>
> I just put "linux" because I really have no clue what IBM is running.
I've updated it a bit, let me know if you think of more versions to
report (e.g. binutils?)
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
Re: [build-test] Tracking platforms and architecure for CI
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> I like the idea. I dream of times when Harmony testing process becomes
> dynamically distributed among active members [1], [2].
>
> Ok, back to the ground. Can we be more precise about OS versions? It
> happened several times when a patch behaved differently on a different
> Linux.
Oh - yes, the intention is that "operating system" is
Ubunutu 6.05
Fedora Core x.y
SLES 9.z
Windows XP SP 2
etc
I just put "linux" because I really have no clue what IBM is running.
geir
>
> 1. http://buildbot.sourceforge.net/
> 2. http://autot.dev.java.net/
>
> On 11/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> I put a wiki page up :
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Automated_Testing
>>
>> (reachable from the front page) to capture how we track and govern the
>> "community CI" effort that build-test is intended to be.
>>
>> So I didn't set out any rules other than someone who's interested has to
>> approach the community (we do gatekeep as we need to manually let mail
>> through to -commits) and note that we reserve the right to refuse anyone.
>>
>> Right now, there's a table that lists the CI going on at IBM. Once
>> Vladimir's machine is sending mail through, we'll add that, and we'll
>> add the build-test running on my x86_64/Ubuntu6 when that's working.
>>
>> geir
>>
>
>
Re: [build-test] Tracking platforms and architecure for CI
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
I like the idea. I dream of times when Harmony testing process becomes
dynamically distributed among active members [1], [2].
Ok, back to the ground. Can we be more precise about OS versions? It
happened several times when a patch behaved differently on a different
Linux.
1. http://buildbot.sourceforge.net/
2. http://autot.dev.java.net/
On 11/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
> I put a wiki page up :
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Automated_Testing
>
> (reachable from the front page) to capture how we track and govern the
> "community CI" effort that build-test is intended to be.
>
> So I didn't set out any rules other than someone who's interested has to
> approach the community (we do gatekeep as we need to manually let mail
> through to -commits) and note that we reserve the right to refuse anyone.
>
> Right now, there's a table that lists the CI going on at IBM. Once
> Vladimir's machine is sending mail through, we'll add that, and we'll
> add the build-test running on my x86_64/Ubuntu6 when that's working.
>
> geir
>
--
Thank you,
Alexei