Re: JMS Binding for Tuscany Java

[Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>]

On 9/24/07, Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/22/07, Joseph, Roshan IN BLR SISL <Ro...@siemens.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I believe the JMS binding is not included in the latest release and if
> > it is due to bugs, I would like to contribute in making it work. Can
> > someone point to the issues in JMS binding or let me know the current
> > status of it.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any help in this regard will be really helpful, as I would like to
> > utilize the binding for my prototype which I am making
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Roshan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Important notice:This e-mail and any attachment thereto contains
> > corporate proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake,
> > please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its
> > attachments from your system. Thank You.
> >
> Hi Roshan
>
> You are right, the JMS binding is not included in the latest release.
> Someone else has just asked about it's status (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1789).
> Basically the JMS binding got to a stage where it supported request/response
> type message patterns but not the full asynchronous model you might expect
> (see the unit tests included with the binding). It does run currently and
> it's included in the build so if you check the latest Java SCA code out of
> trunk you can play with it.
>
> I note, looking at SVN, that there have been a few changes over the last
> month or so, including a new implementation of the jms binding model. Your
> help would be very much appreciate in improving the JMS binding. Shall we
> start making a list here of the things that need to be done?
>
> Something that springs to mind just having had a brief refresh of the code
> is
>
> 1/ move the model information from o.a.t.s.binding.jms.impl.JMSBinding to
> the new model classes under o.a.t.s.binding.jms
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
>
> Hi Joseph

Did you make and progress with your prototype. Do you need any more
help/info. One of our other users has provided some patches to the JMS
binding recently you might want to take a look at.

Regards

Simon