You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by David Graham <gr...@yahoo.com> on 2003/10/22 18:10:15 UTC
[dbutils] ResultSetHandler.handle() method
Currently, the ResultSetHandler.handle() method has this signature:
public Object handle(ResultSet rs, Object params[], Object userObject)
throws SQLException;
The mail archives show the initial suggestions was the simpler:
public Object handle(ResultSet rs) throws SQLException;
None of the handler implementations in DbUtils use the "params" or
"userObject" parameters and the cvs commit that made this change gives no
reason why it was made. What is the use case supporting the additional
parameters? Should we go back to the original version that just takes a
ResultSet?
David
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [dbutils] ResultSetHandler.handle() method
Posted by Juozas Baliuka <ba...@centras.lt>.
Change it to "public Object handle(ResultSet rs) throws SQLException".
"Object params[], Object userObject" was for "ProcedureUtils".
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Graham" <gr...@yahoo.com>
To: <co...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:10 PM
Subject: [dbutils] ResultSetHandler.handle() method
> Currently, the ResultSetHandler.handle() method has this signature:
>
> public Object handle(ResultSet rs, Object params[], Object userObject)
> throws SQLException;
>
> The mail archives show the initial suggestions was the simpler:
>
> public Object handle(ResultSet rs) throws SQLException;
>
> None of the handler implementations in DbUtils use the "params" or
> "userObject" parameters and the cvs commit that made this change gives no
> reason why it was made. What is the use case supporting the additional
> parameters? Should we go back to the original version that just takes a
> ResultSet?
>
> David
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org