You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@s2graph.apache.org by "DOYUNG YOON (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/27 17:30:13 UTC
[jira] [Created] (S2GRAPH-68) Refactor write-write conflict
resolving logic
DOYUNG YOON created S2GRAPH-68:
----------------------------------
Summary: Refactor write-write conflict resolving logic
Key: S2GRAPH-68
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S2GRAPH-68
Project: S2Graph
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: DOYUNG YOON
Assignee: DOYUNG YOON
Current implementation for resolving write-write conflict on snapshotEdge is overwhelmingly complicated, so I am suggesting refactor this to make it easy to understand.
Current master test cases failed with positive fail probability for RPC(hbase.fail.prob=0.01).
I can reproduce it by running `sbt "project s2core" -Dconfig.file=s2rest_play/conf/test.conf test`.
We can think this problem as critical section problem. Multiple thread that want to mutate same SnapshotEdge can only proceed one-by-one to keep consistent view on related IndexEdge. To achieve this, we are storing extra data on SnapshotEdge.
Details are on [gitbook|https://steamshon.gitbooks.io/s2graph-book/content/request_state_diagram.html].
I think following 3 things would be expected output after resolving this issue.
1. more comments and simplified code.
2. remove excessive re-fetch on every retry from partial failure. since it is guaranteed that only one thread can proceed at a time, re-fetch is not necessary.
3. remove Thread.sleep between retry from partial failure.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)