You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> on 2007/04/24 20:50:10 UTC
[VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
features and enhancement:
* WS-policy framework
* WS-Security
* HTTP transport enhancements
* Aegis databinding support
* Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
Spring 2.0 config syntax
* Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and improvements
* Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
* Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
* MUCH MUCH more
The staging area is at:
http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
The distros are in the "distro" directory.
The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
m2-incubating-repository.
This release is tagged at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by James Mao <ja...@iona.com>.
+ 1
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> features and enhancement:
> * WS-policy framework
> * WS-Security
> * HTTP transport enhancements
> * Aegis databinding support
> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and improvements
> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> * MUCH MUCH more
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>
> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
>
>
> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Willem Jiang <ni...@iona.com>.
+1
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> features and enhancement:
> * WS-policy framework
> * WS-Security
> * HTTP transport enhancements
> * Aegis databinding support
> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and improvements
> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> * MUCH MUCH more
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>
> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
>
>
> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Jim Ma <ji...@iona.com>.
+1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:57 AM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
>
>
> +1! :-)
>
> On 4/24/07, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> > major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> > features and enhancement:
> > * WS-policy framework
> > * WS-Security
> > * HTTP transport enhancements
> > * Aegis databinding support
> > * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> > Spring 2.0 config syntax
> > * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and improvements
> > * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> > * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> > * MUCH MUCH more
> >
> >
> > The staging area is at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
> >
> > The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> > The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> > m2-incubating-repository.
> >
> > This release is tagged at:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
> >
> >
> > Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer
> > IONA
> > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>.
+1! :-)
On 4/24/07, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> features and enhancement:
> * WS-policy framework
> * WS-Security
> * HTTP transport enhancements
> * Aegis databinding support
> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and improvements
> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> * MUCH MUCH more
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>
> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
>
>
> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 4/24/07, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> features and enhancement:
> * WS-policy framework
> * WS-Security
> * HTTP transport enhancements
> * Aegis databinding support
> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and improvements
> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> * MUCH MUCH more
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>
> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
>
>
> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Bozhong Lin <bl...@iona.com>.
+1
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> features and enhancement:
> * WS-policy framework
> * WS-Security
> * HTTP transport enhancements
> * Aegis databinding support
> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and improvements
> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> * MUCH MUCH more
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>
> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
>
>
> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
>
exceptions in system test
Posted by Jim Ma <ji...@iona.com>.
I see there are exceptions throwed in system test, but the build is still
successful. Is this the real error message ?
Running org.apache.cxf.systest.servlet.CXFServletTest
java.net.SocketException: Permission denied
at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Native Method)
at
sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:119)
at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:59)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.nio.SelectChannelConnector.open(SelectChannelConnector.jav
a:198)
at org.mortbay.jetty.AbstractConnector.doStart(AbstractConnector.java:251)
at
org.mortbay.jetty.nio.SelectChannelConnector.doStart(SelectChannelConnector.
java:233)
Running org.apache.cxf.systest.ws.policy.HTTPClientPolicyTest
javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException: org.apache.cxf.ws.policy.PolicyException:
Incompatible HTTPClientPolicy assertions.
at org.apache.cxf.jaxws.JaxWsClientProxy.invoke(JaxWsClientProxy.java:134)
at $Proxy41.sayHi(Unknown Source)
at
org.apache.cxf.systest.ws.policy.HTTPClientPolicyTest.testUsingHTTPClientPol
icies(HTTPClientPolicyTest.java:122)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39
)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl
.java:25)
Regards
Jim
RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by "Liu, Jervis" <jl...@iona.com>.
+1
Jervis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Freeman Fang [mailto:freeman.fang@iona.com]
> Sent: 2007?4?25? 13:58
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
>
>
> +1
> :-)
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This
> release is a
> > major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> > features and enhancement:
> > * WS-policy framework
> > * WS-Security
> > * HTTP transport enhancements
> > * Aegis databinding support
> > * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including
> support of
> > Spring 2.0 config syntax
> > * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> improvements
> > * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> > * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> > * MUCH MUCH more
> >
> >
> > The staging area is at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
> >
> > The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> > The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> > m2-incubating-repository.
> >
> > This release is tagged at:
> >
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
>
>
> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@iona.com>.
+1
:-)
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> features and enhancement:
> * WS-policy framework
> * WS-Security
> * HTTP transport enhancements
> * Aegis databinding support
> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and improvements
> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> * MUCH MUCH more
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>
> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
>
>
> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Andrea Smyth <an...@iona.com>.
[-0] because IMO some of the features that are advertised below should
be more complete, specifically:
* There is no demo/sample for the WS-Policy framework, which I think is
important as it's a complex feature.
* There are already many ways to configure certain behaviour
(programatically, policy, ws-feature, plain Spring); I feel that we
should at least restrict the different ways to inject properties of
complex type - i.e. get rid of the use of any remaining property editors
(and use a plain application context) before we make a big fuss about
supporting Spring 2.0 config syntax.
* We had many JIRA issues reported recently about demos not working but
I have not seen corresponding mails reporting the issues as fixed. For a
release I'd prefer them all working.
Andrea.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
>This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
>major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
>features and enhancement:
> * WS-policy framework
> * WS-Security
> * HTTP transport enhancements
> * Aegis databinding support
> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and improvements
> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> * MUCH MUCH more
>
>
>The staging area is at:
>http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>
>The distros are in the "distro" directory.
>The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
>m2-incubating-repository.
>
>This release is tagged at:
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-RC/
>
>
>Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by "Johnson, Eric" <Er...@iona.com>.
+1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:06 PM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
>
> +1 on the release by the way :) :)
>
> On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > Looking over the distro-src:
> > DISCLAIMER seems to lack newlines...
> > STATUS is very out of date
> > Build and test looks good (cannot recreate
> > the exceptions Jim Ma sees)
> >
> > In the binary distro:
> > Same DISCLAIMER note
> > Again, build and test looks good.
> >
> > On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This
> release is a
> >> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> >> features and enhancement:
> >> * WS-policy framework
> >> * WS-Security
> >> * HTTP transport enhancements
> >> * Aegis databinding support
> >> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including
> support of
> >> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> >> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> >> improvements
> >> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> >> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> >> * MUCH MUCH more
> >>
> >>
> >> The staging area is at:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
> >>
> >> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> >> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by
> pushed to the
> >> m2-incubating-repository.
> >>
> >> This release is tagged at:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-
> >> incubator-RC/
> >>
> >>
> >> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> --
> >> J. Daniel Kulp
> >> Principal Engineer
> >> IONA
> >> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> >> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Jonathan Anstey <ja...@iona.com>.
+1!
Balaji Ravi wrote:
> +1...
>
> Yoko project needs to get this release so that we can also release. We
> dont
> want to depend on snapshot version of cxf. Other projects are
> depending on
> yoko also to be released. So i would highly encourage cxf to be released.
>
> Thanks
>
> Balaji
>
> On 4/26/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eo...@iona.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Can you be explicit on the much more we'd have to lose by holding the
>> release until the outstanding issues are resolved?
>>
>> All other things being equal, it would seem more logical to me to just
>> fix up the issues.
>>
>> Could we get the best of both worlds by inviting feedback on a release
>> candidate, as opposed to a full release?
>>
>> On specific issues, I'd like to see the Spring bean createFromAPI/suffix
>> made consistent before the release, as this is a user-facing issue that
>> will cause confusion and would be harder to change (yet again) further
>> down the line, when hopefully there'll be a lot of users with config
>> files in production.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eoghan
>>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
>> > Sent: 25 April 2007 19:12
>> > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
>> >
>> > I think we can update the STATUS/DISCLAIMER issues for our 2.0 final.
>> >
>> > I'm expecting that we still need to squash some bugs in this
>> > release - including things turned up by the TCK, 2 or 3
>> > examples (although from what I understand they mostly work,
>> > just not with servlets?), and a few policy things. I think we
>> > have much more to lose though by not doing a release ASAP and
>> > not getting feedback then we do by waiting until all these
>> > things are resolved
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > - Dan
>> >
>> > On 4/25/07, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > +1 on the release by the way :) :)
>> > >
>> > > On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Looking over the distro-src:
>> > > > DISCLAIMER seems to lack newlines...
>> > > > STATUS is very out of date
>> > > > Build and test looks good (cannot recreate
>> > > > the exceptions Jim Ma sees)
>> > > >
>> > > > In the binary distro:
>> > > > Same DISCLAIMER note
>> > > > Again, build and test looks good.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >>
>> > > >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This
>> > release is a
>> > > >> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
>> > > >> features and enhancement:
>> > > >> * WS-policy framework
>> > > >> * WS-Security
>> > > >> * HTTP transport enhancements
>> > > >> * Aegis databinding support
>> > > >> * Configuration refactoring and improvement,
>> > including support of
>> > > >> Spring 2.0 config syntax
>> > > >> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
>> > > >> improvements
>> > > >> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
>> > > >> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
>> > > >> * MUCH MUCH more
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The staging area is at:
>> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
>> > > >> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by
>> > pushed to the
>> > > >> m2-incubating-repository.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> This release is tagged at:
>> > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-
>> > > >> incubator-RC/
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> J. Daniel Kulp
>> > > >> Principal Engineer
>> > > >> IONA
>> > > >> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
>> > > >> daniel.kulp@iona.com
>> > > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dan Diephouse
>> > Envoi Solutions
>> > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Balaji Ravi <ba...@gmail.com>.
+1...
Yoko project needs to get this release so that we can also release. We dont
want to depend on snapshot version of cxf. Other projects are depending on
yoko also to be released. So i would highly encourage cxf to be released.
Thanks
Balaji
On 4/26/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eo...@iona.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Can you be explicit on the much more we'd have to lose by holding the
> release until the outstanding issues are resolved?
>
> All other things being equal, it would seem more logical to me to just
> fix up the issues.
>
> Could we get the best of both worlds by inviting feedback on a release
> candidate, as opposed to a full release?
>
> On specific issues, I'd like to see the Spring bean createFromAPI/suffix
> made consistent before the release, as this is a user-facing issue that
> will cause confusion and would be harder to change (yet again) further
> down the line, when hopefully there'll be a lot of users with config
> files in production.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> > Sent: 25 April 2007 19:12
> > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
> >
> > I think we can update the STATUS/DISCLAIMER issues for our 2.0 final.
> >
> > I'm expecting that we still need to squash some bugs in this
> > release - including things turned up by the TCK, 2 or 3
> > examples (although from what I understand they mostly work,
> > just not with servlets?), and a few policy things. I think we
> > have much more to lose though by not doing a release ASAP and
> > not getting feedback then we do by waiting until all these
> > things are resolved
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - Dan
> >
> > On 4/25/07, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 on the release by the way :) :)
> > >
> > > On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looking over the distro-src:
> > > > DISCLAIMER seems to lack newlines...
> > > > STATUS is very out of date
> > > > Build and test looks good (cannot recreate
> > > > the exceptions Jim Ma sees)
> > > >
> > > > In the binary distro:
> > > > Same DISCLAIMER note
> > > > Again, build and test looks good.
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This
> > release is a
> > > >> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> > > >> features and enhancement:
> > > >> * WS-policy framework
> > > >> * WS-Security
> > > >> * HTTP transport enhancements
> > > >> * Aegis databinding support
> > > >> * Configuration refactoring and improvement,
> > including support of
> > > >> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> > > >> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> > > >> improvements
> > > >> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> > > >> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> > > >> * MUCH MUCH more
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The staging area is at:
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
> > > >>
> > > >> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> > > >> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by
> > pushed to the
> > > >> m2-incubating-repository.
> > > >>
> > > >> This release is tagged at:
> > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-
> > > >> incubator-RC/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> J. Daniel Kulp
> > > >> Principal Engineer
> > > >> IONA
> > > >> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > > >> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions
> > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Balancing is hard... it's what makes pure open source
in some ways more "difficult" than commercial proprietary
s/w. Open Source should not have "schedules"... the code
is ready when it is ready. Forced timetables should be
avoided.
With all that said, one also needs to recall that you have
a user (and developer) community to handle as well...
It does not serve Yoko (or anyone) to "rush" CXF just
so "they have something", but neither can you ignore
that either... A Release Candidate should mean just
that: it's a potential release. If it isn't, then
don't call it that, or don't release it yet.
On Apr 26, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Glynn, Eoghan wrote:
>
>
> Sure we all want to get the release out ASAP.
>
> We also all obviously want the release to be the highest quality
> possible.
>
> So we've got to strike a balance, in terms of weighing up the known
> issues versus the pressures for a quick release.
>
> I'm not being argumentative, or trying to slow down the release, just
> requesting that we make an explicit trade-off between releasing with
> known issues and taking the time to fix these. I'm not talking
> weeks or
> months here. For example, if was to take a couple days to clean up the
> Spring createdFromAPI versus suffix inconsistency, then I think this
> would be worth doing. IMO our plethora of config options is already
> confusing enough without users having to contend with this
> inconsistency
> also.
>
> Just my 2 euro-cents ...
>
RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by "Glynn, Eoghan" <eo...@iona.com>.
Sure we all want to get the release out ASAP.
We also all obviously want the release to be the highest quality
possible.
So we've got to strike a balance, in terms of weighing up the known
issues versus the pressures for a quick release.
I'm not being argumentative, or trying to slow down the release, just
requesting that we make an explicit trade-off between releasing with
known issues and taking the time to fix these. I'm not talking weeks or
months here. For example, if was to take a couple days to clean up the
Spring createdFromAPI versus suffix inconsistency, then I think this
would be worth doing. IMO our plethora of config options is already
confusing enough without users having to contend with this inconsistency
also.
Just my 2 euro-cents ...
Cheers,
Eoghan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> Sent: 26 April 2007 14:41
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
>
>
> Eoghan,
>
> On Thursday 26 April 2007 06:26, Glynn, Eoghan wrote:
> > Can you be explicit on the much more we'd have to lose by
> holding the
> > release until the outstanding issues are resolved?
>
> Very simple: we've already pissed off some of our users by
> waiting this
> long. We NEED to get release artifacts into the maven
> repository ASAP
> so other projects can proceed with their releases.
>
> The main example is Yoko. 2 months ago, they asked for a
> release so they
> could do a release. We were unable to provide that to them. They
> ended up doing an "orb only" release that didn't include any
> CXF stuff
> at all. That is/was a major "lose" for our community as
> well as their
> community.
>
> They have again asked us for release artifacts. If we
> cannot provide
> them, they will again be forced into an "orb only" release.
> That is
> BAD for both projects. We need to be in a position to
> respond to such
> requests and help our users. Not force them into dropping CXF stuff
> from their releases.
>
> I don't know the current Yoko plans, but at one point they wanted a
> release by JavaOne. Let's look at the timeline. To do that, they
> need to call their vote by next Tuesday. (3 days vote
> internal, 3 days
> on g@i.a.o). Thus, our release needs to be done before that. The
> current vote will hopefully be done tomorrow afternoon internally at
> which point I can start the g@i.a.o vote. 3 days later is Monday,
> although due to the weekend, I should give it longer. We're already
> cutting it too close.
>
>
> > All other things being equal, it would seem more logical to
> me to just
> > fix up the issues.
>
> Yes, we need to fix the issues. I'm hoping to be able to get on a
> fairly frequent release cycle. I'm actually hoping for every 4-6
> weeks. That should provide recent artifacts in the release
> repository for other projects to depend on/use. If we follow
> that schedule, it
> also allows users to expect and plan on when the next release
> will be.
> It's been almost 5 months since the last release. That's
> WAY too long.
>
> We should not force our users to depend on SNAPSHOT versions for very
> long. That's a recipe for disaster. We need frequent non-snapshots
> that the users can migrate to as their plans and schedules permit.
>
>
> > Could we get the best of both worlds by inviting feedback
> on a release
> > candidate, as opposed to a full release?
>
> Doesn't solve the Yoko problem.
>
>
> In anycase, to meet our diversity requirements and attract
> new users and
> developers, we need to get code out to them. This is the
> first step
> in that process.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
> > On specific issues, I'd like to see the Spring bean
> > createFromAPI/suffix made consistent before the release, as
> this is a
> > user-facing issue that will cause confusion and would be harder to
> > change (yet again) further down the line, when hopefully
> there'll be a
> > lot of users with config files in production.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Eoghan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> > > Sent: 25 April 2007 19:12
> > > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
> > >
> > > I think we can update the STATUS/DISCLAIMER issues for our 2.0
> > > final.
> > >
> > > I'm expecting that we still need to squash some bugs in
> this release
> > > - including things turned up by the TCK, 2 or 3 examples
> (although
> > > from what I understand they mostly work, just not with
> servlets?),
> > > and a few policy things. I think we have much more to
> lose though by
> > > not doing a release ASAP and not getting feedback then we do by
> > > waiting until all these things are resolved
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > - Dan
> > >
> > > On 4/25/07, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > > > +1 on the release by the way :) :)
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > > > Looking over the distro-src:
> > > > > DISCLAIMER seems to lack newlines...
> > > > > STATUS is very out of date
> > > > > Build and test looks good (cannot recreate
> > > > > the exceptions Jim Ma sees)
> > > > >
> > > > > In the binary distro:
> > > > > Same DISCLAIMER note
> > > > > Again, build and test looks good.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > > > >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This
> > >
> > > release is a
> > >
> > > > >> major step forward from M1. This release includes
> following new
> > > > >> features and enhancement:
> > > > >> * WS-policy framework
> > > > >> * WS-Security
> > > > >> * HTTP transport enhancements
> > > > >> * Aegis databinding support
> > > > >> * Configuration refactoring and improvement,
> > >
> > > including support of
> > >
> > > > >> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> > > > >> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> > > > >> improvements
> > > > >> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> > > > >> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> > > > >> * MUCH MUCH more
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The staging area is at:
> > > > >>
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take
> > > > >>1/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> > > > >> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by
> > >
> > > pushed to the
> > >
> > > > >> m2-incubating-repository.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This release is tagged at:
> > > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-
> > > > >> incubator-RC/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> J. Daniel Kulp
> > > > >> Principal Engineer
> > > > >> IONA
> > > > >> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > > > >> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > > > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> > >
> > > --
> > > Dan Diephouse
> > > Envoi Solutions
> > > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
Eoghan,
On Thursday 26 April 2007 06:26, Glynn, Eoghan wrote:
> Can you be explicit on the much more we'd have to lose by holding the
> release until the outstanding issues are resolved?
Very simple: we've already pissed off some of our users by waiting this
long. We NEED to get release artifacts into the maven repository ASAP
so other projects can proceed with their releases.
The main example is Yoko. 2 months ago, they asked for a release so they
could do a release. We were unable to provide that to them. They
ended up doing an "orb only" release that didn't include any CXF stuff
at all. That is/was a major "lose" for our community as well as their
community.
They have again asked us for release artifacts. If we cannot provide
them, they will again be forced into an "orb only" release. That is
BAD for both projects. We need to be in a position to respond to such
requests and help our users. Not force them into dropping CXF stuff
from their releases.
I don't know the current Yoko plans, but at one point they wanted a
release by JavaOne. Let's look at the timeline. To do that, they
need to call their vote by next Tuesday. (3 days vote internal, 3 days
on g@i.a.o). Thus, our release needs to be done before that. The
current vote will hopefully be done tomorrow afternoon internally at
which point I can start the g@i.a.o vote. 3 days later is Monday,
although due to the weekend, I should give it longer. We're already
cutting it too close.
> All other things being equal, it would seem more logical to me to just
> fix up the issues.
Yes, we need to fix the issues. I'm hoping to be able to get on a
fairly frequent release cycle. I'm actually hoping for every 4-6
weeks. That should provide recent artifacts in the release repository
for other projects to depend on/use. If we follow that schedule, it
also allows users to expect and plan on when the next release will be.
It's been almost 5 months since the last release. That's WAY too long.
We should not force our users to depend on SNAPSHOT versions for very
long. That's a recipe for disaster. We need frequent non-snapshots
that the users can migrate to as their plans and schedules permit.
> Could we get the best of both worlds by inviting feedback on a release
> candidate, as opposed to a full release?
Doesn't solve the Yoko problem.
In anycase, to meet our diversity requirements and attract new users and
developers, we need to get code out to them. This is the first step
in that process.
Dan
> On specific issues, I'd like to see the Spring bean
> createFromAPI/suffix made consistent before the release, as this is a
> user-facing issue that will cause confusion and would be harder to
> change (yet again) further down the line, when hopefully there'll be a
> lot of users with config files in production.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> > Sent: 25 April 2007 19:12
> > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
> >
> > I think we can update the STATUS/DISCLAIMER issues for our 2.0
> > final.
> >
> > I'm expecting that we still need to squash some bugs in this
> > release - including things turned up by the TCK, 2 or 3
> > examples (although from what I understand they mostly work,
> > just not with servlets?), and a few policy things. I think we
> > have much more to lose though by not doing a release ASAP and
> > not getting feedback then we do by waiting until all these
> > things are resolved
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - Dan
> >
> > On 4/25/07, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > > +1 on the release by the way :) :)
> > >
> > > On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > > Looking over the distro-src:
> > > > DISCLAIMER seems to lack newlines...
> > > > STATUS is very out of date
> > > > Build and test looks good (cannot recreate
> > > > the exceptions Jim Ma sees)
> > > >
> > > > In the binary distro:
> > > > Same DISCLAIMER note
> > > > Again, build and test looks good.
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > > >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This
> >
> > release is a
> >
> > > >> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> > > >> features and enhancement:
> > > >> * WS-policy framework
> > > >> * WS-Security
> > > >> * HTTP transport enhancements
> > > >> * Aegis databinding support
> > > >> * Configuration refactoring and improvement,
> >
> > including support of
> >
> > > >> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> > > >> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> > > >> improvements
> > > >> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> > > >> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> > > >> * MUCH MUCH more
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The staging area is at:
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take
> > > >>1/
> > > >>
> > > >> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> > > >> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by
> >
> > pushed to the
> >
> > > >> m2-incubating-repository.
> > > >>
> > > >> This release is tagged at:
> > > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-
> > > >> incubator-RC/
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> J. Daniel Kulp
> > > >> Principal Engineer
> > > >> IONA
> > > >> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > > >> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions
> > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by "Glynn, Eoghan" <eo...@iona.com>.
Hi Dan,
Can you be explicit on the much more we'd have to lose by holding the
release until the outstanding issues are resolved?
All other things being equal, it would seem more logical to me to just
fix up the issues.
Could we get the best of both worlds by inviting feedback on a release
candidate, as opposed to a full release?
On specific issues, I'd like to see the Spring bean createFromAPI/suffix
made consistent before the release, as this is a user-facing issue that
will cause confusion and would be harder to change (yet again) further
down the line, when hopefully there'll be a lot of users with config
files in production.
Cheers,
Eoghan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> Sent: 25 April 2007 19:12
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
>
> I think we can update the STATUS/DISCLAIMER issues for our 2.0 final.
>
> I'm expecting that we still need to squash some bugs in this
> release - including things turned up by the TCK, 2 or 3
> examples (although from what I understand they mostly work,
> just not with servlets?), and a few policy things. I think we
> have much more to lose though by not doing a release ASAP and
> not getting feedback then we do by waiting until all these
> things are resolved
>
> Cheers,
> - Dan
>
> On 4/25/07, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 on the release by the way :) :)
> >
> > On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > > Looking over the distro-src:
> > > DISCLAIMER seems to lack newlines...
> > > STATUS is very out of date
> > > Build and test looks good (cannot recreate
> > > the exceptions Jim Ma sees)
> > >
> > > In the binary distro:
> > > Same DISCLAIMER note
> > > Again, build and test looks good.
> > >
> > > On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This
> release is a
> > >> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> > >> features and enhancement:
> > >> * WS-policy framework
> > >> * WS-Security
> > >> * HTTP transport enhancements
> > >> * Aegis databinding support
> > >> * Configuration refactoring and improvement,
> including support of
> > >> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> > >> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> > >> improvements
> > >> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> > >> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> > >> * MUCH MUCH more
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The staging area is at:
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
> > >>
> > >> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> > >> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by
> pushed to the
> > >> m2-incubating-repository.
> > >>
> > >> This release is tagged at:
> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-
> > >> incubator-RC/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> J. Daniel Kulp
> > >> Principal Engineer
> > >> IONA
> > >> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > >> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>.
I think we can update the STATUS/DISCLAIMER issues for our 2.0 final.
I'm expecting that we still need to squash some bugs in this release -
including things turned up by the TCK, 2 or 3 examples (although from what I
understand they mostly work, just not with servlets?), and a few policy
things. I think we have much more to lose though by not doing a release ASAP
and not getting feedback then we do by waiting until all these things are
resolved
Cheers,
- Dan
On 4/25/07, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> +1 on the release by the way :) :)
>
> On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > Looking over the distro-src:
> > DISCLAIMER seems to lack newlines...
> > STATUS is very out of date
> > Build and test looks good (cannot recreate
> > the exceptions Jim Ma sees)
> >
> > In the binary distro:
> > Same DISCLAIMER note
> > Again, build and test looks good.
> >
> > On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> >> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> >> features and enhancement:
> >> * WS-policy framework
> >> * WS-Security
> >> * HTTP transport enhancements
> >> * Aegis databinding support
> >> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> >> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> >> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> >> improvements
> >> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> >> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> >> * MUCH MUCH more
> >>
> >>
> >> The staging area is at:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
> >>
> >> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> >> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> >> m2-incubating-repository.
> >>
> >> This release is tagged at:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-
> >> incubator-RC/
> >>
> >>
> >> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> --
> >> J. Daniel Kulp
> >> Principal Engineer
> >> IONA
> >> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> >> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
+1 on the release by the way :) :)
On Apr 25, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Looking over the distro-src:
> DISCLAIMER seems to lack newlines...
> STATUS is very out of date
> Build and test looks good (cannot recreate
> the exceptions Jim Ma sees)
>
> In the binary distro:
> Same DISCLAIMER note
> Again, build and test looks good.
>
> On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
>> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
>> features and enhancement:
>> * WS-policy framework
>> * WS-Security
>> * HTTP transport enhancements
>> * Aegis databinding support
>> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
>> Spring 2.0 config syntax
>> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
>> improvements
>> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
>> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
>> * MUCH MUCH more
>>
>>
>> The staging area is at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>>
>> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
>> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
>> m2-incubating-repository.
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-
>> incubator-RC/
>>
>>
>> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>>
>> --
>> J. Daniel Kulp
>> Principal Engineer
>> IONA
>> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
>> daniel.kulp@iona.com
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Looking over the distro-src:
DISCLAIMER seems to lack newlines...
STATUS is very out of date
Build and test looks good (cannot recreate
the exceptions Jim Ma sees)
In the binary distro:
Same DISCLAIMER note
Again, build and test looks good.
On Apr 24, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> features and enhancement:
> * WS-policy framework
> * WS-Security
> * HTTP transport enhancements
> * Aegis databinding support
> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> improvements
> * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> * MUCH MUCH more
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>
> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-
> incubator-RC/
>
>
> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>.
I believe your vote still matters as we need 3 +1s from Incubator PMC
members, which you are one of.
BTW, I'm pushing the incubator people at apache to take a look at the
release this week. Hopefully we'll push this vote along :-)
- Dan
On 5/1/07, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Damn, missed the count - but here's my +1 anyway :)
>
> On 4/27/07, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > This vote has passed with:
> >
> >
> > Super +1: Jim Jageilski (IPMC)
> > +1: Dan Kulp, Dan Diephouse, Jim Ma, James Mao, Willem Jiang, Bo Lin,
> > Freeman Fang, Jervis Lui, Eric Johnson, Guillaume Nodet
> > 0: Andrea Smyth
> >
> > No -1 votes.
> >
> > This vote passes here, I'm sending this onto general@incubator.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday 24 April 2007 14:50, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> > > major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> > > features and enhancement:
> > > * WS-policy framework
> > > * WS-Security
> > > * HTTP transport enhancements
> > > * Aegis databinding support
> > > * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> > > Spring 2.0 config syntax
> > > * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> > > improvements * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> > > * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> > > * MUCH MUCH more
> > >
> > >
> > > The staging area is at:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
> > >
> > > The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> > > The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> > > m2-incubating-repository.
> > >
> > > This release is tagged at:
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-R
> > >C/
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer
> > IONA
> > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> > daniel.kulp@iona.com
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
>
>
> --
> James
> -------
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Damn, missed the count - but here's my +1 anyway :)
On 4/27/07, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> This vote has passed with:
>
>
> Super +1: Jim Jageilski (IPMC)
> +1: Dan Kulp, Dan Diephouse, Jim Ma, James Mao, Willem Jiang, Bo Lin,
> Freeman Fang, Jervis Lui, Eric Johnson, Guillaume Nodet
> 0: Andrea Smyth
>
> No -1 votes.
>
> This vote passes here, I'm sending this onto general@incubator.
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
> On Tuesday 24 April 2007 14:50, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> > major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> > features and enhancement:
> > * WS-policy framework
> > * WS-Security
> > * HTTP transport enhancements
> > * Aegis databinding support
> > * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> > Spring 2.0 config syntax
> > * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> > improvements * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> > * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> > * MUCH MUCH more
> >
> >
> > The staging area is at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
> >
> > The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> > The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> > m2-incubating-repository.
> >
> > This release is tagged at:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-R
> >C/
> >
> >
> > Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
Let me throw in my non-binding and very late, yet supportive vote (even
though it already passed) ;-)
+1
Jeff
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> This vote has passed with:
>
>
> Super +1: Jim Jageilski (IPMC)
> +1: Dan Kulp, Dan Diephouse, Jim Ma, James Mao, Willem Jiang, Bo Lin,
> Freeman Fang, Jervis Lui, Eric Johnson, Guillaume Nodet
> 0: Andrea Smyth
>
> No -1 votes.
>
> This vote passes here, I'm sending this onto general@incubator.
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
> On Tuesday 24 April 2007 14:50, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
>> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
>> features and enhancement:
>> * WS-policy framework
>> * WS-Security
>> * HTTP transport enhancements
>> * Aegis databinding support
>> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
>> Spring 2.0 config syntax
>> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
>> improvements * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
>> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
>> * MUCH MUCH more
>>
>>
>> The staging area is at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>>
>> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
>> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
>> m2-incubating-repository.
>>
>> This release is tagged at:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-R
>> C/
>>
>>
>> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
>
[RESULT][VOTE] Release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
This vote has passed with:
Super +1: Jim Jageilski (IPMC)
+1: Dan Kulp, Dan Diephouse, Jim Ma, James Mao, Willem Jiang, Bo Lin,
Freeman Fang, Jervis Lui, Eric Johnson, Guillaume Nodet
0: Andrea Smyth
No -1 votes.
This vote passes here, I'm sending this onto general@incubator.
Thanks!
Dan
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 14:50, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0-incubator-RC. This release is a
> major step forward from M1. This release includes following new
> features and enhancement:
> * WS-policy framework
> * WS-Security
> * HTTP transport enhancements
> * Aegis databinding support
> * Configuration refactoring and improvement, including support of
> Spring 2.0 config syntax
> * Tooling (mainly wsdl2java, java2wsdl) refactoring and
> improvements * Many JAX-WS issues fixes (still not tck compliant yet)
> * Many other JIRA issues and code cleanup
> * MUCH MUCH more
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator-RC_take1/
>
> The distros are in the "distro" directory.
> The "maven" directory contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0-incubator-R
>C/
>
>
> Here is my +1. The vote will be open here for 72 hours.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
daniel.kulp@iona.com
http://www.dankulp.com/blog