Discussion of external projects was Re: gcc 3.3 warnings

[Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>]

--On Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:29 PM -0700 Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com> 
wrote:

> Not image, just an individual's name recognition.  It seems to me that
> if an individual is known, then it's easier to get stuff done.  I'm more
> known on svn, so any issues I raise here get more of a response.  I
> have raised issues on apr or httpd, and in my experience, raising them
> in svn gets the job done more quickly and easily.

No, but it is a matter that discussions about a project should be on that 
project's mailing list.  I really dislike it when people discuss changes about 
project B on an project A's list.  That does a tremendous disservice to the 
developers on project B that aren't on project A's list.

As far as not receiving a response, for all of the patches that I can recall 
on either dev@apr and dev@httpd, you never followed up to comments or reposted 
them.  That is pretty much a pre-req on some of the busier lists.  -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org