You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by "Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/06/26 07:08:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (MEECROWAVE-199) Meecrowave.Builder should be
more like a Builder indeed ;)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16873012#comment-16873012 ]
Romain Manni-Bucau commented on MEECROWAVE-199:
-----------------------------------------------
+1(mea culpa) the only requirement is to keep real setters (returning void) *too* for factories (xbean,spring, custom, etc)
> Meecrowave.Builder should be more like a Builder indeed ;)
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MEECROWAVE-199
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MEECROWAVE-199
> Project: Meecrowave
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.2.8
> Reporter: Mark Struberg
> Assignee: Mark Struberg
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.2.9
>
>
> Right now this is more like a POJO. All the setters do not return this, so it dismisses the builder approach we propose in our samples.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)