You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com> on 2007/10/24 03:50:07 UTC

[VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

The stdcxx community has just successfully closed a vote to release
stdcxx 4.2.0. In accordance with the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy we request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
tarball containing the release on the stdcxx Download page.

This vote will close in the usual 72 hours, on Friday, October 26 at
8PM MDT. See http://tinyurl.com/3cnwoj for the countdown.

Thanks
Martin

Vote result (contains links to the tarball and README containing the
required incubation artifacts):
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--release-stdcxx-4.2.0-%28candidate-7%29-p13377405.html

Stdcxx Download page:
http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/download.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Martin Sebor wrote:
> Has anyone had a chance to review this release? Did we miss something
> that needs to be addressed in order to appove the request?

I would already +1 the process; I also hoped to actually install and
build on a few platforms.  Unfortunately I don't get to mess with it
until this weekend, my schedules' been chaotic.

Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
+1 (non-binding)

I ran RAT 0.5.1 on it, and it looks fine.

Note to Robert: RAT seems to get confused by file
names ending in *.lib.cpp (treats them as binary).
I'll submit a patch when RAT starts incubation... :-)

--Thilo

Martin Sebor wrote:
> Has anyone had a chance to review this release? Did we miss something
> that needs to be addressed in order to appove the request?
> 
> Thanks
> Martin
> 
> 
> Martin Sebor wrote:
>> The stdcxx community has just successfully closed a vote to release
>> stdcxx 4.2.0. In accordance with the Releases section of the Incubation
>> Policy we request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
>> tarball containing the release on the stdcxx Download page.
>>
>> This vote will close in the usual 72 hours, on Friday, October 26 at
>> 8PM MDT. See http://tinyurl.com/3cnwoj for the countdown.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Martin
>>
>> Vote result (contains links to the tarball and README containing the
>> required incubation artifacts):
>> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--release-stdcxx-4.2.0-%28candidate-7%29-p13377405.html
>>
>> Stdcxx Download page:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/download.html
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Matthieu Riou <ma...@offthelip.org>.
On 10/28/07, Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
> >
> > +1. I'm not sure if my vote is binding or not.
> >
>
> Thank you! Only votes of Incubator PMC members are binding.
> Unless you are one we still need one more IPMC vote. Could
> we have an IPMC member either confirm that Kevan's vote
> counts or kindly check out the tarball and give us the last
> binding yay?


Kevan is now officially IPMC so his vote is binding.

Cheers,
Matthieu

Kevan Miller wrote:
> >
> > I did not build (or test). However, RAT and brief of inspection of
> > source looked good.
> >
> > One comment -- I see that many source files contain Rogue Wave
> > Software copyrights (e.g. src/access.h) and one source file contains
> > an HP copyright (i.e. src/parisc/atomic.s). If at all possible, these
> > copyrights should be removed from your source (by the copyright
> > holder, of course) -- they are already in your NOTICE. Hmm. Although
> > the HP copyright is 2002 in your source file and 1994 in your NOTICE
> > file...
> >
> > --kevan
> >
>
> With the exception of src/parisc/atomic.s all of the rest of the files
> that bear the HP copyright are from 1994 (the HP STL). I'll update
> NOTICE.txt to on trunk reflect the atomic.s date of copyright.
> My understanding of the HP license is that it must appear in all
> files so we wouldn't be able to remove it without HP's permission.
> I'll have to check with Rogue Wave legal to see what they think
> about moving our copyright notices to just one file.
>
> Thanks again.
> Martin
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-stdcxx-4.2.0-release-tf4681976.html#a13461410
> Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>.

Kevan Miller wrote:
> 
> +1. I'm not sure if my vote is binding or not.
> 

Thank you! Only votes of Incubator PMC members are binding.
Unless you are one we still need one more IPMC vote. Could
we have an IPMC member either confirm that Kevan's vote
counts or kindly check out the tarball and give us the last
binding yay?


Kevan Miller wrote:
> 
> I did not build (or test). However, RAT and brief of inspection of
> source looked good.
> 
> One comment -- I see that many source files contain Rogue Wave
> Software copyrights (e.g. src/access.h) and one source file contains
> an HP copyright (i.e. src/parisc/atomic.s). If at all possible, these
> copyrights should be removed from your source (by the copyright
> holder, of course) -- they are already in your NOTICE. Hmm. Although
> the HP copyright is 2002 in your source file and 1994 in your NOTICE
> file...
> 
> --kevan
> 

With the exception of src/parisc/atomic.s all of the rest of the files
that bear the HP copyright are from 1994 (the HP STL). I'll update
NOTICE.txt to on trunk reflect the atomic.s date of copyright.
My understanding of the HP license is that it must appear in all
files so we wouldn't be able to remove it without HP's permission.
I'll have to check with Rogue Wave legal to see what they think
about moving our copyright notices to just one file.

Thanks again.
Martin
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-stdcxx-4.2.0-release-tf4681976.html#a13461410
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
+1. I'm not sure if my vote is binding or not.

I did not build (or test). However, RAT and brief of inspection of
source looked good.

One comment -- I see that many source files contain Rogue Wave
Software copyrights (e.g. src/access.h) and one source file contains
an HP copyright (i.e. src/parisc/atomic.s). If at all possible, these
copyrights should be removed from your source (by the copyright
holder, of course) -- they are already in your NOTICE. Hmm. Although
the HP copyright is 2002 in your source file and 1994 in your NOTICE
file...

--kevan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>.
Thank you! We need one more binding vote to approve the release.

For conveniece, the link to the tarball is here:
http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx-4.2.0-rc-7/stdcxx-incubating-4.2.0.tar.gz

Martin


Matthieu Riou-5 wrote:
> 
> On 10/26/07, Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks Bill and Thilo for your votes! We need two more binding votes to
>> approve the release. I extended the vote to 120 hours to give everyone
>> more time to download the tarball and check it out over the weekend. The
>> vote will close on Sunday, October 28 at 8:00PM US/Mountain time. See
>> the following page for the new countdown: http://tinyurl.com/2jfkf2
> 
> 
> The release file looks good to me, a random check didn't show any missing
> header and the LICENSE and NOTICE files are okay. Please next time include
> a
> direct link to the tarball in your general@ vote e-mail, it's really not a
> biggy but it's more convenient that way.
> 
> Here's my +1.
> 
> Matthieu
> 
> Martin Sebor wrote:
>> >
>> > Has anyone had a chance to review this release? Did we miss something
>> > that needs to be addressed in order to appove the request?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Martin
>> >
>> >
>> > Martin Sebor wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The stdcxx community has just successfully closed a vote to release
>> >> stdcxx 4.2.0. In accordance with the Releases section of the
>> Incubation
>> >> Policy we request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
>> >> tarball containing the release on the stdcxx Download page.
>> >>
>> >> This vote will close in the usual 72 hours, on Friday, October 26 at
>> >> 8PM MDT. See http://tinyurl.com/3cnwoj for the countdown.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> Martin
>> >>
>> >> Vote result (contains links to the tarball and README containing the
>> >> required incubation artifacts):
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--release-stdcxx-4.2.0-%28candidate-7%29-p13377405.html
>> >>
>> >> Stdcxx Download page:
>> >> http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/download.html
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-stdcxx-4.2.0-release-tf4681976.html#a13436826
>> Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-stdcxx-4.2.0-release-tf4681976.html#a13459186
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Matthieu Riou <ma...@offthelip.org>.
On 10/26/07, Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Bill and Thilo for your votes! We need two more binding votes to
> approve the release. I extended the vote to 120 hours to give everyone
> more time to download the tarball and check it out over the weekend. The
> vote will close on Sunday, October 28 at 8:00PM US/Mountain time. See
> the following page for the new countdown: http://tinyurl.com/2jfkf2


The release file looks good to me, a random check didn't show any missing
header and the LICENSE and NOTICE files are okay. Please next time include a
direct link to the tarball in your general@ vote e-mail, it's really not a
biggy but it's more convenient that way.

Here's my +1.

Matthieu

Martin Sebor wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone had a chance to review this release? Did we miss something
> > that needs to be addressed in order to appove the request?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> The stdcxx community has just successfully closed a vote to release
> >> stdcxx 4.2.0. In accordance with the Releases section of the Incubation
> >> Policy we request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
> >> tarball containing the release on the stdcxx Download page.
> >>
> >> This vote will close in the usual 72 hours, on Friday, October 26 at
> >> 8PM MDT. See http://tinyurl.com/3cnwoj for the countdown.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Martin
> >>
> >> Vote result (contains links to the tarball and README containing the
> >> required incubation artifacts):
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--release-stdcxx-4.2.0-%28candidate-7%29-p13377405.html
> >>
> >> Stdcxx Download page:
> >> http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/download.html
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-stdcxx-4.2.0-release-tf4681976.html#a13436826
> Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>.
Thanks Bill and Thilo for your votes! We need two more binding votes to
approve the release. I extended the vote to 120 hours to give everyone
more time to download the tarball and check it out over the weekend. The
vote will close on Sunday, October 28 at 8:00PM US/Mountain time. See
the following page for the new countdown: http://tinyurl.com/2jfkf2


Martin Sebor wrote:
> 
> Has anyone had a chance to review this release? Did we miss something
> that needs to be addressed in order to appove the request?
> 
> Thanks
> Martin
> 
> 
> Martin Sebor wrote:
>> 
>> The stdcxx community has just successfully closed a vote to release
>> stdcxx 4.2.0. In accordance with the Releases section of the Incubation
>> Policy we request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
>> tarball containing the release on the stdcxx Download page.
>> 
>> This vote will close in the usual 72 hours, on Friday, October 26 at
>> 8PM MDT. See http://tinyurl.com/3cnwoj for the countdown.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Martin
>> 
>> Vote result (contains links to the tarball and README containing the
>> required incubation artifacts):
>> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--release-stdcxx-4.2.0-%28candidate-7%29-p13377405.html
>> 
>> Stdcxx Download page:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/download.html
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-stdcxx-4.2.0-release-tf4681976.html#a13436826
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>.
Has anyone had a chance to review this release? Did we miss something
that needs to be addressed in order to appove the request?

Thanks
Martin


Martin Sebor wrote:
> 
> The stdcxx community has just successfully closed a vote to release
> stdcxx 4.2.0. In accordance with the Releases section of the Incubation
> Policy we request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
> tarball containing the release on the stdcxx Download page.
> 
> This vote will close in the usual 72 hours, on Friday, October 26 at
> 8PM MDT. See http://tinyurl.com/3cnwoj for the countdown.
> 
> Thanks
> Martin
> 
> Vote result (contains links to the tarball and README containing the
> required incubation artifacts):
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--release-stdcxx-4.2.0-%28candidate-7%29-p13377405.html
> 
> Stdcxx Download page:
> http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/download.html
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-stdcxx-4.2.0-release-tf4681976.html#a13429863
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE RESULT] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>.
The request to release stdcxx 4.2.0 has reached the required
minimum of three binding +1 votes with no other votes recorded.

   Kevan Miller
   Matthieu Riou
   Thilo Goetz   (non-binding)
   William A. Rowe, Jr.

Thank you!
Martin

Martin Sebor wrote:
> The stdcxx community has just successfully closed a vote to release
> stdcxx 4.2.0. In accordance with the Releases section of the Incubation
> Policy we request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
> tarball containing the release on the stdcxx Download page.
> 
> This vote will close in the usual 72 hours, on Friday, October 26 at
> 8PM MDT. See http://tinyurl.com/3cnwoj for the countdown.
> 
> Thanks
> Martin
> 
> Vote result (contains links to the tarball and README containing the
> required incubation artifacts):
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--release-stdcxx-4.2.0-%28candidate-7%29-p13377405.html 
> 
> 
> Stdcxx Download page:
> http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/download.html
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE RESULT] approve stdcxx 4.2.0 release

Posted by Martin Sebor <se...@roguewave.com>.
The request to release stdcxx 4.2.0 has reached the required
minimum of three binding +1 votes with no other votes recorded.

   Kevan Miller
   Matthieu Riou
   Thilo Goetz   (non-binding)
   William A. Rowe, Jr.

Thank you!
Martin

Martin Sebor wrote:
> The stdcxx community has just successfully closed a vote to release
> stdcxx 4.2.0. In accordance with the Releases section of the Incubation
> Policy we request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
> tarball containing the release on the stdcxx Download page.
> 
> This vote will close in the usual 72 hours, on Friday, October 26 at
> 8PM MDT. See http://tinyurl.com/3cnwoj for the countdown.
> 
> Thanks
> Martin
> 
> Vote result (contains links to the tarball and README containing the
> required incubation artifacts):
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--release-stdcxx-4.2.0-%28candidate-7%29-p13377405.html 
> 
> 
> Stdcxx Download page:
> http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/download.html
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>