You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by rb...@covalent.net on 2001/04/04 05:42:49 UTC
2.0.17
We are NOT rolling 2.0.17. It doesn't make any sense to do that. The
only change was to APR-util's Makefile.in. The easy solution is to re-tag
that file, and re-roll the release. Greg and I spoke, and that makes
SOOOO much more sense than re-tagging the whole tree. Expect the new
tarballs in a few minutes.
BTW, with this change, I am counting three +1's.
Will Rowe
Bill Stoddard
Ryan Bloom
I want more for this release. Come on guys, I know you're out there.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: 2.0.17
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
> I want more for this release. Come on guys, I know you're out there.
FWIW, looks like "make install" needs some more tweaks. Libtool isn't
necessarily in the path, but it should be in the current working dir
(srclib/apr). Patch included. (Unless I am missing something here...)
-- justin
Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apr/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -r1.44 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in 2001/04/03 20:32:06 1.44
+++ Makefile.in 2001/04/04 04:11:35
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
if [ ! -d $(libdir) ]; then \
./build/mkdir.sh $(libdir); \
fi; \
- libtool --mode=install cp $(TARGET_LIB) $(libdir)
+ ./libtool --mode=install cp $(TARGET_LIB) $(libdir)
$(TARGET_LIB):
@for i in $(SUBDIRS); do objects="$$objects $$i/*.lo"; done ; \
Re: 2.0.17
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
> I want more for this release. Come on guys, I know you're out there.
FWIW, looks like "make install" needs some more tweaks. Libtool isn't
necessarily in the path, but it should be in the current working dir
(srclib/apr). Patch included. (Unless I am missing something here...)
-- justin
Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apr/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -r1.44 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in 2001/04/03 20:32:06 1.44
+++ Makefile.in 2001/04/04 04:11:35
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
if [ ! -d $(libdir) ]; then \
./build/mkdir.sh $(libdir); \
fi; \
- libtool --mode=install cp $(TARGET_LIB) $(libdir)
+ ./libtool --mode=install cp $(TARGET_LIB) $(libdir)
$(TARGET_LIB):
@for i in $(SUBDIRS); do objects="$$objects $$i/*.lo"; done ; \
Re: 2.0.17
Posted by Greg Ames <gr...@remulak.net>.
rbb@covalent.net wrote:
>
> Okay, the new 2.0.16 is in dev.apache.org/dist. It can also be retrieved
> with a checkout of the APACHE_2_0_16 tag.
>
It's also running live on daedalus as of 23:02:36 PDT. It's lookin'
good! +1
> >
> > BTW, with this change, I am counting three +1's.
s/three/four/
> >
> > Will Rowe
> > Bill Stoddard
> > Ryan Bloom
Greg Ames
> >
Greg
Re: 2.0.17
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
Okay, the new 2.0.16 is in dev.apache.org/dist. It can also be retrieved
with a checkout of the APACHE_2_0_16 tag.
Ryan
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001 rbb@covalent.net wrote:
>
> We are NOT rolling 2.0.17. It doesn't make any sense to do that. The
> only change was to APR-util's Makefile.in. The easy solution is to re-tag
> that file, and re-roll the release. Greg and I spoke, and that makes
> SOOOO much more sense than re-tagging the whole tree. Expect the new
> tarballs in a few minutes.
>
> BTW, with this change, I am counting three +1's.
>
> Will Rowe
> Bill Stoddard
> Ryan Bloom
>
> I want more for this release. Come on guys, I know you're out there.
>
> Ryan
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: 2.0.17
Posted by Doug MacEachern <do...@covalent.net>.
+1 on beta. modperl-2.0-dev 'make test' passes for me with mpm-threaded
and Perl 5.7.1-dev and passed for john sterling with mpm-prefork and Perl
5.6.0 ...
server localhost:8529 started (pid=19533, version=Apache/2.0.17-dev)
server localhost:8530 listening (TestProtocol::echo)
filter/lc...........ok
filter/reverse......ok
apache/post.........ok
apache/conftree.....ok
hooks/authen........ok
protocol/echo.......ok
apr/netlib..........ok
apr/lib.............ok
apr/uuid............ok
api/conn_rec........ok
api/request_rec.....ok
api/server_rec......ok
api/module..........ok
api/lookup_uri......ok
All tests successful.
Files=14, Tests=101, 14 wallclock secs (11.26 cusr + 0.55 csys = 11.81 CPU)
server localhost:8529 shutdown (pid=19533)