You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@aries.apache.org by "Valentin Mahrwald (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/03/11 14:44:27 UTC

[jira] Created: (ARIES-246) Blueprint ComponentDefinitionRegistryProcessor falls over with duplicate recipe ids

Blueprint ComponentDefinitionRegistryProcessor falls over with duplicate recipe ids
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: ARIES-246
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-246
             Project: Aries
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Blueprint
    Affects Versions: 0.1
            Reporter: Valentin Mahrwald
            Assignee: Valentin Mahrwald


When attempting to use a component definition registry processor, the following kind of problem can occur, where subsequently blueprint will fall over due to duplicate ids for anonymous components.

org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl doRun Unable to start blueprint container for bundle com.ibm.ws.eba.interop.bundle
                                 org.osgi.service.blueprint.container.ComponentDefinitionException: Name #recipe-3 is already registered to instance org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintRepository.putRecipe(BlueprintRepository.java:113 	org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.ServiceRecipe.createRecipe(ServiceRecipe.java:348 org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.ServiceRecipe.register(ServiceRecipe.java:139 org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.registerServices(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:628 org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.doRun(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:312 	org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.run(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:212
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:453 
...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Resolved: (ARIES-246) Blueprint ComponentDefinitionRegistryProcessor falls over with duplicate recipe ids

Posted by "Valentin Mahrwald (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Valentin Mahrwald resolved ARIES-246.
-------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

> Blueprint ComponentDefinitionRegistryProcessor falls over with duplicate recipe ids
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARIES-246
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-246
>             Project: Aries
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Blueprint
>    Affects Versions: 0.1
>            Reporter: Valentin Mahrwald
>            Assignee: Valentin Mahrwald
>
> When attempting to use a component definition registry processor, the following kind of problem can occur, where subsequently blueprint will fall over due to duplicate ids for anonymous components.
> org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl doRun Unable to start blueprint container for bundle com.ibm.ws.eba.interop.bundle
>                                  org.osgi.service.blueprint.container.ComponentDefinitionException: Name #recipe-3 is already registered to instance org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintRepository.putRecipe(BlueprintRepository.java:113 	org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.ServiceRecipe.createRecipe(ServiceRecipe.java:348 org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.ServiceRecipe.register(ServiceRecipe.java:139 org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.registerServices(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:628 org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.doRun(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:312 	org.apache.aries.blueprint.container.BlueprintContainerImpl.run(BlueprintContainerImpl.java:212
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:453 
> ...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.