You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Tibor Digana (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/08 12:14:42 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SUREFIRE-1325) Monitoring the testing memory consumption and printed with elapsed time

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15961785#comment-15961785 ] 

Tibor Digana edited comment on SUREFIRE-1325 at 4/8/17 12:14 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[~Bingoko]
Having the elapsed time would help me too, but the memory consumption should be fixed after I introduce a new format of stream. The stream transfers data from forked jvm to Maven process.
If you want to you can patch the elapsed time and open pull request in GitHub.


was (Author: tibor17):
[~Bingoko]
Having the elapsed time would help me too, but the memory consumption should fixed after I introduce a new format of stream. The format transfers data from forked jvm to Maven process.
If you want to you can patch the elapsed time and open pull request in GitHub.

> Monitoring the testing memory consumption and printed with elapsed time
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SUREFIRE-1325
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1325
>             Project: Maven Surefire
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Maven Surefire Plugin, process forking
>            Reporter: Bob Li
>              Labels: profiler
>   Original Estimate: 12h
>  Remaining Estimate: 12h
>
> As the user, the elapsed time for executing the test case is important, but I think the memory consumption is also important. 
> I think the maven surefire could printed both of them for the user.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)