You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr> on 2008/06/27 11:30:59 UTC
[VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Hi,
After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for
releasing 2.0M2.
Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still
OPEN :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
This release is not a stable one, some API change will probably occurs
like ByteBuffers, sendFile(), but it will help to get more feed back for
about last changes.
Julien,
Now let's vote !
[ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
[ ]: 0, Abstain
[ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M1
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Posted by Mark Webb <el...@gmail.com>.
[ X]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for
> releasing 2.0M2.
>
> Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still
> OPEN :
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
>
> This release is not a stable one, some API change will probably occurs
> like ByteBuffers, sendFile(), but it will help to get more feed back for
> about last changes.
>
> Julien,
>
> Now let's vote !
> [ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
> [ ]: 0, Abstain
> [ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M1
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:30:59 +0200
Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for
> releasing 2.0M2.
>
> Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still
> OPEN :
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
>
> This release is not a stable one, some API change will probably occurs
> like ByteBuffers, sendFile(), but it will help to get more feed back
> for about last changes.
>
> Julien,
>
> Now let's vote !
> [ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
> [ ]: 0, Abstain
> [ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M1
+1,
I keep in mind we need to find a way to provide the correct signed
jar in the future for better review process.
Julien
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Posted by Mike Heath <mh...@apache.org>.
Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for
> releasing 2.0M2.
>
> Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still
> OPEN :
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
>
> This release is not a stable one, some API change will probably occurs
> like ByteBuffers, sendFile(), but it will help to get more feed back for
> about last changes.
>
> Julien,
>
> Now let's vote !
> [ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
> [ ]: 0, Abstain
> [ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M1
>
+1
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
> The release is done, now I wait for mirror to update,
> I placed the tarballs here temporary, if you want to check signature
> files :
> http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0.0-M2/
>
> Julien
>
Thanks, Julien !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:14:37 +0200
"Niklas Gustavsson" <ni...@protocol7.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Julien Vermillard
> <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> > The release is done, now I wait for mirror to update,
> > I placed the tarballs here temporary, if you want to check signature
> > files :
> > http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0.0-M2/
>
> Looks good, could we also verify the Maven artifacts?
>
> /niklas
yes, they was automatically uploaded to maven repo.
Julien
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Julien Vermillard
<jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> The release is done, now I wait for mirror to update,
> I placed the tarballs here temporary, if you want to check signature
> files :
> http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0.0-M2/
Looks good, could we also verify the Maven artifacts?
/niklas
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:56:01 +0200
Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> Julien Vermillard wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:30:59 +0200
> > Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment
> >> for releasing 2.0M2.
> >>
> >> Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one
> >> still OPEN :
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
> >>
> >> This release is not a stable one, some API change will probably
> >> occurs like ByteBuffers, sendFile(), but it will help to get more
> >> feed back for about last changes.
> >>
> >> Julien,
> >>
> >> Now let's vote !
> >> [ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
> >> [ ]: 0, Abstain
> >> [ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M1
> >>
> >
> > Closing the vote :
> >
> > Binding +1 :
> > - Emmanuel Lecharny
> > - Niklas Gustavsson
> > - Mark Webb
> > - Mike Heath
> > - Julien Vermillard
> >
> > Let's start the release monkey job ;)
> >
> A good timing to check that we have signed the distribs correctly !
> > Julien
> >
>
>
The release is done, now I wait for mirror to update,
I placed the tarballs here temporary, if you want to check signature
files :
http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0.0-M2/
Julien
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
Julien Vermillard wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:30:59 +0200
> Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for
>> releasing 2.0M2.
>>
>> Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still
>> OPEN :
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
>>
>> This release is not a stable one, some API change will probably occurs
>> like ByteBuffers, sendFile(), but it will help to get more feed back
>> for about last changes.
>>
>> Julien,
>>
>> Now let's vote !
>> [ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
>> [ ]: 0, Abstain
>> [ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M1
>>
>
> Closing the vote :
>
> Binding +1 :
> - Emmanuel Lecharny
> - Niklas Gustavsson
> - Mark Webb
> - Mike Heath
> - Julien Vermillard
>
> Let's start the release monkey job ;)
>
A good timing to check that we have signed the distribs correctly !
> Julien
>
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.0.M2
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:30:59 +0200
Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for
> releasing 2.0M2.
>
> Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still
> OPEN :
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
>
> This release is not a stable one, some API change will probably occurs
> like ByteBuffers, sendFile(), but it will help to get more feed back
> for about last changes.
>
> Julien,
>
> Now let's vote !
> [ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
> [ ]: 0, Abstain
> [ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M1
Closing the vote :
Binding +1 :
- Emmanuel Lecharny
- Niklas Gustavsson
- Mark Webb
- Mike Heath
- Julien Vermillard
Let's start the release monkey job ;)
Julien
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:47:53 +0200
Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Julien Vermillard
> > <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, very true, the problem is for producing all the artifact,
> >> actually it's a few hours (last time it took me half a day) for
> >> generate and verify everything (signature files, reports,
> >> binaries, etc..).
> >
> > Yeah, it's a pain. However, since we need to review them before the
> > release, it's probably better for one person to go through the
> > process rather than all voters.
> >
> IMHO, we should do what is necessary to get the candidate release
> being testable :
> - rev number given
> - binary prepared
> - branch created
>
> But when it comes to signature, reports, etc, this is a little bit
> overkilling. If the release is not done correctly, because we have
> produced the wrong signatures, then we do another release. As soon as
> we are able to test the binaries, we should be ok.
> >
> >> Perhaps we should do a two stage vote, one for saying current
> >> branch is ok for releasing, then if it's accepted, someone do the
> >> tedious release dry-run job, and a second vote for reviewing the
> >> related artifacts.
> >
> > I don't think we need a formal +1/0/-1 vote for the first decision,
> > a discussion thread would probably be sufficient.
> >
> I agree. Or we would soon vote to launch a vote :)
>
I'm trying to do a dry run release for creating tarballs and not
snapshot jars. There is this kind of feature in maven ?
Because simply running "mvn -DdryRun=true release:prepare" doesn't
create the jar.
Any idea ?
Julien
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Julien Vermillard
> <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
>
>> Yes, very true, the problem is for producing all the artifact, actually
>> it's a few hours (last time it took me half a day) for generate and
>> verify everything (signature files, reports, binaries, etc..).
>>
>
> Yeah, it's a pain. However, since we need to review them before the
> release, it's probably better for one person to go through the process
> rather than all voters.
>
IMHO, we should do what is necessary to get the candidate release being
testable :
- rev number given
- binary prepared
- branch created
But when it comes to signature, reports, etc, this is a little bit
overkilling. If the release is not done correctly, because we have
produced the wrong signatures, then we do another release. As soon as we
are able to test the binaries, we should be ok.
>
>> Perhaps we should do a two stage vote, one for saying current branch is
>> ok for releasing, then if it's accepted, someone do the tedious release
>> dry-run job, and a second vote for reviewing the related artifacts.
>>
>
> I don't think we need a formal +1/0/-1 vote for the first decision, a
> discussion thread would probably be sufficient.
>
I agree. Or we would soon vote to launch a vote :)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Julien Vermillard
<jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> Yes, very true, the problem is for producing all the artifact, actually
> it's a few hours (last time it took me half a day) for generate and
> verify everything (signature files, reports, binaries, etc..).
Yeah, it's a pain. However, since we need to review them before the
release, it's probably better for one person to go through the process
rather than all voters.
> Perhaps we should do a two stage vote, one for saying current branch is
> ok for releasing, then if it's accepted, someone do the tedious release
> dry-run job, and a second vote for reviewing the related artifacts.
I don't think we need a formal +1/0/-1 vote for the first decision, a
discussion thread would probably be sufficient.
/niklas
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:46:58 +0200
"Niklas Gustavsson" <ni...@protocol7.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Julien Vermillard
> <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> > I think it's helping to review the build process too :)
>
> Of course, but those options does not exclude each others :-)
>
> > Anyway for the one who prefer binaries :
> > http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/
>
> I'm feeling incredibly annoying today, but having the real release
> candidates would have been the optimal solution. That is, not SNAPSHOT
> builds, RAT report and including hash files. For example using the
> Maven staging support. Anyways, let's do that for the next release.
>
> For this release, I've built, ran RAT, reviewed the source and
> binaries. Looks good.
>
> +1 for release.
>
> /niklas
Yes, very true, the problem is for producing all the artifact, actually
it's a few hours (last time it took me half a day) for generate and
verify everything (signature files, reports, binaries, etc..).
Perhaps we should do a two stage vote, one for saying current branch is
ok for releasing, then if it's accepted, someone do the tedious release
dry-run job, and a second vote for reviewing the related artifacts.
Julien
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> I would suggest we update the following page :
> http://mina.apache.org/developer-guide.html#DeveloperGuide-ReleasingaPointRelease(CommittersOnly)
> with the proposed steps to get a release ready for review, before the real
> release is done.
Agreed.
/niklas
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
>> Anyway for the one who prefer binaries :
>> http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/
>>
>
> I'm feeling incredibly annoying today,
Being annoying in this business sounds like being professional :) Some
may find that being bureaucratic, but I think they simply don't
understand what is at stake...
> but having the real release
> candidates would have been the optimal solution. That is, not SNAPSHOT
> builds, RAT report and including hash files. For example using the
> Maven staging support. Anyways, let's do that for the next release.
>
I would suggest we update the following page :
http://mina.apache.org/developer-guide.html#DeveloperGuide-ReleasingaPointRelease(CommittersOnly)
with the proposed steps to get a release ready for review, before the
real release is done.
Thanks Niklas, and thanks Julien for having been responsive !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Julien Vermillard
<jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> I think it's helping to review the build process too :)
Of course, but those options does not exclude each others :-)
> Anyway for the one who prefer binaries :
> http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/
I'm feeling incredibly annoying today, but having the real release
candidates would have been the optimal solution. That is, not SNAPSHOT
builds, RAT report and including hash files. For example using the
Maven staging support. Anyways, let's do that for the next release.
For this release, I've built, ran RAT, reviewed the source and
binaries. Looks good.
+1 for release.
/niklas
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:10:14 +0200
"Niklas Gustavsson" <ni...@protocol7.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Julien Vermillard
> <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> > Ha yep sorry,
> >
> > Revision 67224
>
> Would it be possible to have binaries as well? Yeah, I know we're
> really only releasing source code but it would feel better to be able
> to review the real binaries before they go out. We did review the
> binaries for the last release vote we did.
>
> /niklas
I think it's helping to review the build process too :)
Anyway for the one who prefer binaries :
http://people.apache.org/~jvermillard/2.0-M2-SNAPSHOT/
Julien
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Julien Vermillard
<jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> Ha yep sorry,
>
> Revision 67224
Would it be possible to have binaries as well? Yeah, I know we're
really only releasing source code but it would feel better to be able
to review the real binaries before they go out. We did review the
binaries for the last release vote we did.
/niklas
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:50:15 +0200
"Niklas Gustavsson" <ni...@protocol7.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Julien Vermillard
> <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> >> Now let's vote !
>
> What are we voting for? Are we voting for doing a release at all or on
> the release as such? If the latter, could we have a tag and binary to
> review? If the former, hell yeah, I want M2 as soon as possible ;-)
>
> /niklas
Ha yep sorry,
Revision 67224
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Julien Vermillard
<jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
>> Now let's vote !
What are we voting for? Are we voting for doing a release at all or on
the release as such? If the latter, could we have a tag and binary to
review? If the former, hell yeah, I want M2 as soon as possible ;-)
/niklas
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@apache.org>.
> [X]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M2
>
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0-M2
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:30:59 +0200
Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for
> releasing 2.0M2.
>
> Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still
> OPEN :
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
>
> This release is not a stable one, some API change will probably occurs
> like ByteBuffers, sendFile(), but it will help to get more feed back
> for about last changes.
>
> Julien,
>
> Now let's vote !
> [ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
> [ ]: 0, Abstain
> [ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M1
oups, it's
[ ]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M2
[ ]: 0, Abstain
[ ]: -1, Don't release MINA 2.0-M2
sorry for the buggy copy/paste :)