Re: Geronimo v2.2 discussion

[Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>]

Reviving thread....

Does anyone have additional items they would like to see in a 2.2 
release that is not listed on the 2.2 Roadmap page?

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.2+Release+Roadmap


-Donald


Hernan Cunico wrote:
> Hi All,
> We kinda started to have some discussion some time ago but couldn't find 
> any hit on nabble so not sure were we left it.
> 
> I added a Geronimo v2.2 Roadmap <../GMOxDEV/geronimo-v22-roadmap.html> 
> page at the top of the Development section in the wiki front page, 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/ so we can resume the discussion and 
> collect all our thoughts in one place. (edit access is limited to 
> committers/contributors though)
> 
> Does anybody already have a list?
> 
> Cheers!
> Hernan
> 

Re: Geronimo v2.2 discussion

[Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>]

On Sep 11, 2008, at 11:11 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> I really think its essential that we upgrade to activemq 5.x.  I'm  
> happy to work on this but have a bunch of stuff to finish first.   
> I'm likely to vote against any release proposal that doesn't include  
> this.  If anyone else wants to take a look I'm happy to give  
> advice.  The first piece of advice is to use the "native" activemq  
> spring configuration rather than our gbean component wrappers  -- or  
> else find a 3rd new solution.

I'd certainly agree that we need to rev to the latest AMQ release. I'd  
agree that it is *essential*.

Support for more flexible configuration of AMQ would certainly be  
nice, but probably not essential. I'd be happy to start with our  
existing capabilities and improve from there. That said, it'll  
probably be easier to hook in the native configuration...

--kevan

Re: Geronimo v2.2 discussion

[David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>]

I really think its essential that we upgrade to activemq 5.x.  I'm  
happy to work on this but have a bunch of stuff to finish first.  I'm  
likely to vote against any release proposal that doesn't include  
this.  If anyone else wants to take a look I'm happy to give advice.   
The first piece of advice is to use the "native" activemq spring  
configuration rather than our gbean component wrappers  -- or else  
find a 3rd new solution.

thanks
david jencks

On Sep 11, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Donald Woods wrote:

> Reviving thread....
>
> Does anyone have additional items they would like to see in a 2.2  
> release that is not listed on the 2.2 Roadmap page?
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.2+Release+Roadmap
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> We kinda started to have some discussion some time ago but couldn't  
>> find any hit on nabble so not sure were we left it.
>> I added a Geronimo v2.2 Roadmap <../GMOxDEV/geronimo-v22- 
>> roadmap.html> page at the top of the Development section in the  
>> wiki front page, http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/ so we can resume  
>> the discussion and collect all our thoughts in one place. (edit  
>> access is limited to committers/contributors though)
>> Does anybody already have a list?
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan

Re: Geronimo v2.2 discussion

[Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>]

I just added an item for Grails/JRuby that I'd like to investigate for 2.2.

Joe

Donald Woods wrote:
> Reviving thread....
> 
> Does anyone have additional items they would like to see in a 2.2 
> release that is not listed on the 2.2 Roadmap page?
> 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.2+Release+Roadmap 
> 
> 
> 
> -Donald
> 
> 
> Hernan Cunico wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> We kinda started to have some discussion some time ago but couldn't 
>> find any hit on nabble so not sure were we left it.
>>
>> I added a Geronimo v2.2 Roadmap <../GMOxDEV/geronimo-v22-roadmap.html> 
>> page at the top of the Development section in the wiki front page, 
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/geronimo/ so we can resume the discussion and 
>> collect all our thoughts in one place. (edit access is limited to 
>> committers/contributors though)
>>
>> Does anybody already have a list?
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Hernan
>>
>