You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@bookkeeper.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/05/29 03:05:12 UTC

[GitHub] sijie commented on issue #1436: BP-14 force() API - client side implementation

sijie commented on issue #1436: BP-14 force() API - client side implementation
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1436#issuecomment-392640178
 
 
   @jvrao @eolivelli : I am wondering how would be the relationship between `force()` and `explicitLac`. my feeling is that these two operations are kind of similar/same operation, basically we are requesting advancing lac in either case.
   
   If you guys agree with that, it is probably making more sense to reuse `explicitLac` as the request for `force()` api. we can add a flag in `explicitLac` indicating whether we want to force the journal. 
   
   if no, we need to figure out what does following behavior mean:
   
   - if a client enables explicit lac, what `explicitLac` is exactly doing for deferred sync ledgers.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services