You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Stefan Seifert (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/05/21 16:04:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-4734) Sightly should try to instanciate Sling Models first via SlingHttpServletRequest then via Resource and not the other way round

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14554313#comment-14554313 ] 

Stefan Seifert commented on SLING-4734:
---------------------------------------

+1

> Sightly should try to instanciate Sling Models first via SlingHttpServletRequest then via Resource and not the other way round
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-4734
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4734
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Scripting
>    Affects Versions: Scripting Sightly Engine 1.0.4, Scripting Sightly Models Use Provider 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>
> Currently the {{JavaUseProvider}} first tries to instantiate Sling Models via the {{Resource}} then via the {{SlingHttpServletRequest}}. I would argue that the inverse order makes more sense, because more injections are supported via the {{SlingHttpServletRequest}} for Sling Models.
> This would only matter though, where the same class would be adaptable from both {{Resource}} and {{SlingHttpServletRequest}}. In that case though the instantiation via the {{SlingHttpServletRequest}} would support more injections (e.g. the SlingObjectInjector supports much more with the {{SlingHttpServletRequest}}, compare with SLING-4083)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)