You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@beehive.apache.org by Daryl Olander <do...@gmail.com> on 2005/10/20 16:41:18 UTC
AJAX Support
There has been a number of suggestions to add AJAX support to Beehive. I'm
beginning to really look at what type of support we want to add to Beehive.
I'm really curious what people out there expect from Beehive. For example,
should Beehive adopt one or more existing frameworks on the client and
integrate these with the the tag libraries and page flow actions? Should
Beehive create a simple client side framework itself? What frameworks seem
to work best in the "real world"?
I'd love to hear from people with experience and thoughts on this.
Thanks
Daryl
Re: AJAX Support
Posted by Antony Chien <an...@gmail.com>.
DWR pratically enables javascript-based Controller tier, thus breaking the
necessity of beehive pageflow.
I would suggest another approach for Beehuve: using a combination of Rico(
http://openrico.org/rico/home.page) and http://glm-ajax.sourceforge.net/
I have personally used them in a conference demo for Beehive pageflow quite
successfully :-)
2005/10/21, Aaron Oathout <ao...@gmail.com>:
>
> We have used DWR on weblogic 9.0. Worth taking a look at
>
> On 10/20/05, Kevin Conaway <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've had success using DWR with WebLogic 8.1 SP2
> >
> > DWR
> > http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > On 10/20/05, James Black <jb...@ieee.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Daryl Olander wrote:
> > > > There has been a number of suggestions to add AJAX support to
> Beehive.
> > > I'm
> > > > beginning to really look at what type of support we want to add to
> > > Beehive.
> > > > I'm really curious what people out there expect from Beehive. For
> > > example,
> > > > should Beehive adopt one or more existing frameworks on the client
> and
> > > > integrate these with the the tag libraries and page flow actions?
> Should
> > > > Beehive create a simple client side framework itself? What
> frameworks
> > > seem
> > > > to work best in the "real world"?
> > >
> > > I have a webapp that uses controls, pageflow and webservices, all
> > > using beehive.
> > >
> > > For one part of it, at least, I would like to use ajax. I wouldn't
> > > care if an existing framework is used, as long as everything can work
> > > together.
> > >
> > > I have been playing with Echo2, but I don't know if that would be
> > > useful, and laszlo would be a bad choice, since it converts to flash.
> > >
> > > I would just expect that if I have ajax enabled pages that they can
> > > work smoothly with the non-ajax pages in my webapp.
> > >
> > > - --
> > > "Love is mutual self-giving that ends in self-recovery." Fulton Sheen
> > > James Black james@usf.edu
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
> > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> > >
> > > iD8DBQFDV+BzikQgpVn8xrARAsMZAJsH0wgzWgdLl/XY0oaI55ZDH8PNbwCgiuuG
> > > zTa/fvQIjGRsK+3G3CrO/HE=
> > > =7YVI
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
Regards,
Antony Chien
Re: AJAX Support
Posted by Aaron Oathout <ao...@gmail.com>.
We have used DWR on weblogic 9.0. Worth taking a look at
On 10/20/05, Kevin Conaway <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've had success using DWR with WebLogic 8.1 SP2
>
> DWR
> http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/
>
> Kevin
>
> On 10/20/05, James Black <jb...@ieee.org> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Daryl Olander wrote:
> > > There has been a number of suggestions to add AJAX support to Beehive.
> > I'm
> > > beginning to really look at what type of support we want to add to
> > Beehive.
> > > I'm really curious what people out there expect from Beehive. For
> > example,
> > > should Beehive adopt one or more existing frameworks on the client and
> > > integrate these with the the tag libraries and page flow actions? Should
> > > Beehive create a simple client side framework itself? What frameworks
> > seem
> > > to work best in the "real world"?
> >
> > I have a webapp that uses controls, pageflow and webservices, all
> > using beehive.
> >
> > For one part of it, at least, I would like to use ajax. I wouldn't
> > care if an existing framework is used, as long as everything can work
> > together.
> >
> > I have been playing with Echo2, but I don't know if that would be
> > useful, and laszlo would be a bad choice, since it converts to flash.
> >
> > I would just expect that if I have ajax enabled pages that they can
> > work smoothly with the non-ajax pages in my webapp.
> >
> > - --
> > "Love is mutual self-giving that ends in self-recovery." Fulton Sheen
> > James Black james@usf.edu
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> > iD8DBQFDV+BzikQgpVn8xrARAsMZAJsH0wgzWgdLl/XY0oaI55ZDH8PNbwCgiuuG
> > zTa/fvQIjGRsK+3G3CrO/HE=
> > =7YVI
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
>
>
Re: AJAX Support
Posted by Kevin Conaway <ke...@gmail.com>.
I've had success using DWR with WebLogic 8.1 SP2
DWR
http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/
Kevin
On 10/20/05, James Black <jb...@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Daryl Olander wrote:
> > There has been a number of suggestions to add AJAX support to Beehive.
> I'm
> > beginning to really look at what type of support we want to add to
> Beehive.
> > I'm really curious what people out there expect from Beehive. For
> example,
> > should Beehive adopt one or more existing frameworks on the client and
> > integrate these with the the tag libraries and page flow actions? Should
> > Beehive create a simple client side framework itself? What frameworks
> seem
> > to work best in the "real world"?
>
> I have a webapp that uses controls, pageflow and webservices, all
> using beehive.
>
> For one part of it, at least, I would like to use ajax. I wouldn't
> care if an existing framework is used, as long as everything can work
> together.
>
> I have been playing with Echo2, but I don't know if that would be
> useful, and laszlo would be a bad choice, since it converts to flash.
>
> I would just expect that if I have ajax enabled pages that they can
> work smoothly with the non-ajax pages in my webapp.
>
> - --
> "Love is mutual self-giving that ends in self-recovery." Fulton Sheen
> James Black james@usf.edu
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDV+BzikQgpVn8xrARAsMZAJsH0wgzWgdLl/XY0oaI55ZDH8PNbwCgiuuG
> zTa/fvQIjGRsK+3G3CrO/HE=
> =7YVI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: AJAX Support
Posted by James Black <jb...@ieee.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Daryl Olander wrote:
> There has been a number of suggestions to add AJAX support to Beehive. I'm
> beginning to really look at what type of support we want to add to Beehive.
> I'm really curious what people out there expect from Beehive. For example,
> should Beehive adopt one or more existing frameworks on the client and
> integrate these with the the tag libraries and page flow actions? Should
> Beehive create a simple client side framework itself? What frameworks seem
> to work best in the "real world"?
I have a webapp that uses controls, pageflow and webservices, all
using beehive.
For one part of it, at least, I would like to use ajax. I wouldn't
care if an existing framework is used, as long as everything can work
together.
I have been playing with Echo2, but I don't know if that would be
useful, and laszlo would be a bad choice, since it converts to flash.
I would just expect that if I have ajax enabled pages that they can
work smoothly with the non-ajax pages in my webapp.
- --
"Love is mutual self-giving that ends in self-recovery." Fulton Sheen
James Black james@usf.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDV+BzikQgpVn8xrARAsMZAJsH0wgzWgdLl/XY0oaI55ZDH8PNbwCgiuuG
zTa/fvQIjGRsK+3G3CrO/HE=
=7YVI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----