You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2011/11/11 01:17:48 UTC
[VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]
Coming back to this.....
It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
that Olio will graduate.
So, voting:
[ ] +1
[ ] -1, no because...
Hen
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>> On 8/17/2011 12:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> The copyright item isn't signed off at
>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/olio.html.
>>>>
>>>> So would need to delete the code (assuming a successful retirement vote).
>>>
>>> Where are the mentors?
>>>
>>> Wondering how conflicted-providence IP would hit svn in the first place.
>>
>> Digging a bit:
>>
>> "Initial Olio code dump from Sun" by clr. r700550
>> "Added rails webapp" by wsobel. r705828
>> "Adding Web20Emulator" by sheetal. r706388
>>
>> There were other large adds, but those were the three initial big ones.
>>
>> I don't see any software grants relating to Olio. I see lots in the
>> board reports about struggling to get committer diversity because the
>> committers were at 3 corporations.
>>
>> I don't believe that conflicted-providence IP would have hit svn, yet
>> if it's not signed off and (assuming no one steps up to say otherwise)
>> I think delete is the only option we have.
>
> Agreed. Unless the mentors can check off that checkbox prior to the
> project's dormancy, svn will need to be rm'ed.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Craig - nice to not have to delete the code :)
I've updated the site.
Hen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Craig L Russell
<cr...@oracle.com> wrote:
> +1 to retire Olio.
>
> The code grant for olio was signed and recorded
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/documents/cclas/sun-microsystems-olio.pdf
> ) but the checkbox wasn't checked in the podling status.
>
> Making it read only would be the proper course of action.
>
> Craig
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Coming back to this.....
>>
>> It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
>> that Olio will graduate.
>>
>> So, voting:
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] -1, no because...
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>>> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/17/2011 12:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The copyright item isn't signed off at
>>>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/olio.html.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So would need to delete the code (assuming a successful retirement
>>>>>> vote).
>>>>>
>>>>> Where are the mentors?
>>>>>
>>>>> Wondering how conflicted-providence IP would hit svn in the first
>>>>> place.
>>>>
>>>> Digging a bit:
>>>>
>>>> "Initial Olio code dump from Sun" by clr. r700550
>>>> "Added rails webapp" by wsobel. r705828
>>>> "Adding Web20Emulator" by sheetal. r706388
>>>>
>>>> There were other large adds, but those were the three initial big ones.
>>>>
>>>> I don't see any software grants relating to Olio. I see lots in the
>>>> board reports about struggling to get committer diversity because the
>>>> committers were at 3 corporations.
>>>>
>>>> I don't believe that conflicted-providence IP would have hit svn, yet
>>>> if it's not signed off and (assuming no one steps up to say otherwise)
>>>> I think delete is the only option we have.
>>>
>>> Agreed. Unless the mentors can check off that checkbox prior to the
>>> project's dormancy, svn will need to be rm'ed.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Oracle
> http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]
Posted by Craig L Russell <cr...@oracle.com>.
+1 to retire Olio.
The code grant for olio was signed and recorded (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/documents/cclas/sun-microsystems-olio.pdf
) but the checkbox wasn't checked in the podling status.
Making it read only would be the proper course of action.
Craig
On Nov 10, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Coming back to this.....
>
> It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
> that Olio will graduate.
>
> So, voting:
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, no because...
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/2011 12:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>> The copyright item isn't signed off at
>>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/olio.html.
>>>>>
>>>>> So would need to delete the code (assuming a successful
>>>>> retirement vote).
>>>>
>>>> Where are the mentors?
>>>>
>>>> Wondering how conflicted-providence IP would hit svn in the first
>>>> place.
>>>
>>> Digging a bit:
>>>
>>> "Initial Olio code dump from Sun" by clr. r700550
>>> "Added rails webapp" by wsobel. r705828
>>> "Adding Web20Emulator" by sheetal. r706388
>>>
>>> There were other large adds, but those were the three initial big
>>> ones.
>>>
>>> I don't see any software grants relating to Olio. I see lots in the
>>> board reports about struggling to get committer diversity because
>>> the
>>> committers were at 3 corporations.
>>>
>>> I don't believe that conflicted-providence IP would have hit svn,
>>> yet
>>> if it's not signed off and (assuming no one steps up to say
>>> otherwise)
>>> I think delete is the only option we have.
>>
>> Agreed. Unless the mentors can check off that checkbox prior to the
>> project's dormancy, svn will need to be rm'ed.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Coming back to this.....
>
> It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
> that Olio will graduate.
>
> So, voting:
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, no because...
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/2011 12:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>> The copyright item isn't signed off at
>>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/olio.html.
>>>>>
>>>>> So would need to delete the code (assuming a successful retirement vote).
>>>>
>>>> Where are the mentors?
>>>>
>>>> Wondering how conflicted-providence IP would hit svn in the first place.
>>>
>>> Digging a bit:
>>>
>>> "Initial Olio code dump from Sun" by clr. r700550
>>> "Added rails webapp" by wsobel. r705828
>>> "Adding Web20Emulator" by sheetal. r706388
>>>
>>> There were other large adds, but those were the three initial big ones.
>>>
>>> I don't see any software grants relating to Olio. I see lots in the
>>> board reports about struggling to get committer diversity because the
>>> committers were at 3 corporations.
>>>
>>> I don't believe that conflicted-providence IP would have hit svn, yet
>>> if it's not signed off and (assuming no one steps up to say otherwise)
>>> I think delete is the only option we have.
>>
>> Agreed. Unless the mentors can check off that checkbox prior to the
>> project's dormancy, svn will need to be rm'ed.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
5 +1s to retire Olio.
Happily the IP did get signed off on, so no need to remove the source
code from SVN.
I'll go ahead and update the Incubator site to indicate that the
project is now retired.
Hen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Coming back to this.....
>
> It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
> that Olio will graduate.
>
> So, voting:
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, no because...
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/2011 12:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>> The copyright item isn't signed off at
>>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/olio.html.
>>>>>
>>>>> So would need to delete the code (assuming a successful retirement vote).
>>>>
>>>> Where are the mentors?
>>>>
>>>> Wondering how conflicted-providence IP would hit svn in the first place.
>>>
>>> Digging a bit:
>>>
>>> "Initial Olio code dump from Sun" by clr. r700550
>>> "Added rails webapp" by wsobel. r705828
>>> "Adding Web20Emulator" by sheetal. r706388
>>>
>>> There were other large adds, but those were the three initial big ones.
>>>
>>> I don't see any software grants relating to Olio. I see lots in the
>>> board reports about struggling to get committer diversity because the
>>> committers were at 3 corporations.
>>>
>>> I don't believe that conflicted-providence IP would have hit svn, yet
>>> if it's not signed off and (assuming no one steps up to say otherwise)
>>> I think delete is the only option we have.
>>
>> Agreed. Unless the mentors can check off that checkbox prior to the
>> project's dormancy, svn will need to be rm'ed.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Coming back to this.....
>
> It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
> that Olio will graduate.
>
> So, voting:
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, no because...
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/2011 12:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>> The copyright item isn't signed off at
>>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/olio.html.
>>>>>
>>>>> So would need to delete the code (assuming a successful retirement vote).
>>>>
>>>> Where are the mentors?
>>>>
>>>> Wondering how conflicted-providence IP would hit svn in the first place.
>>>
>>> Digging a bit:
>>>
>>> "Initial Olio code dump from Sun" by clr. r700550
>>> "Added rails webapp" by wsobel. r705828
>>> "Adding Web20Emulator" by sheetal. r706388
>>>
>>> There were other large adds, but those were the three initial big ones.
>>>
>>> I don't see any software grants relating to Olio. I see lots in the
>>> board reports about struggling to get committer diversity because the
>>> committers were at 3 corporations.
>>>
>>> I don't believe that conflicted-providence IP would have hit svn, yet
>>> if it's not signed off and (assuming no one steps up to say otherwise)
>>> I think delete is the only option we have.
>>
>> Agreed. Unless the mentors can check off that checkbox prior to the
>> project's dormancy, svn will need to be rm'ed.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Retire Olio [Was: Retire Olio?]
Posted by Ralph Goers <ra...@dslextreme.com>.
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Nov 10, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Coming back to this.....
>
> It unfortunately seems that there's no (even optimistic) expectation
> that Olio will graduate.
>
> So, voting:
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, no because...
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 8/17/2011 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>>>> On 8/17/2011 12:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>> The copyright item isn't signed off at
>>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/projects/olio.html.
>>>>>
>>>>> So would need to delete the code (assuming a successful retirement vote).
>>>>
>>>> Where are the mentors?
>>>>
>>>> Wondering how conflicted-providence IP would hit svn in the first place.
>>>
>>> Digging a bit:
>>>
>>> "Initial Olio code dump from Sun" by clr. r700550
>>> "Added rails webapp" by wsobel. r705828
>>> "Adding Web20Emulator" by sheetal. r706388
>>>
>>> There were other large adds, but those were the three initial big ones.
>>>
>>> I don't see any software grants relating to Olio. I see lots in the
>>> board reports about struggling to get committer diversity because the
>>> committers were at 3 corporations.
>>>
>>> I don't believe that conflicted-providence IP would have hit svn, yet
>>> if it's not signed off and (assuming no one steps up to say otherwise)
>>> I think delete is the only option we have.
>>
>> Agreed. Unless the mentors can check off that checkbox prior to the
>> project's dormancy, svn will need to be rm'ed.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org