Re: jdk7 feature that might be good for ofbiz

[Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>]

Removing Javolution could be part of a move to JDK 1.7

What do you think?

Jacques

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <ja...@hotwaxmedia.com>
> This page may be useful:
>
> http://javolution.org/doc/benchmark.html
>
> Jacopo
>
> On May 27, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> On 05/27/2012 07:09 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>> From: "Adrian Crum" <ad...@sandglass-software.com>
>>>> FYI, in the Mini-language overhaul I interned the Element tag name
>>>> Strings.
>>>
>>> Yes, that's really a good improvment! Things are much more clear now.
>>> It's only in minilang though (I mean not in widgets actions yet), right?
>>>
>>>> Another thing to discuss is the proper use of Javolution and/or
>>>> whether we still need it.
>>>
>>> Yes, I also wondered about that last week when willing to cast to a
>>> TreeMap.
>>> The fact that it's a one man project and will maybe less and less
>>> supported http://javolution.org/#HISTORY is not yet an issue but could be
>>
>> I personally see no need for javolution.  It's non-standard concurrency(java.util.concurrent).  It does it's own memory 
>> allocation, which prevents escape-analysis from working(allocating memory on the stack instead of the heap).
>>
>
>