You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "A.S.Thiwanka Somasiri (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/04/24 20:31:49 UTC
[jira] Commented: (DERBY-4625) TIMESTAMP function doesn't accept
nanoseconds
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860562#action_12860562 ]
A.S.Thiwanka Somasiri commented on DERBY-4625:
----------------------------------------------
Hi Knut,
What are the classes that are used to call the timestamp functions?I referred mechanisms in UnaryDateTimestampOperatorNode.java class to some extent.
Thanks.
> TIMESTAMP function doesn't accept nanoseconds
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-4625
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4625
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.5.3.0
> Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
> Priority: Minor
>
> The TIMESTAMP function fails if the string argument specifies the number of nanoseconds. It works if the argument is limited to nanosecond resolution.
> ij> values timestamp('2010-04-21 12:00:00.123456');
> 1
> --------------------------
> 2010-04-21 12:00:00.123456
> 1 row selected
> ij> values timestamp('2010-04-21 12:00:00.123456789');
> ERROR 22008: '2010-04-21 12:00:00.123456789' is an invalid argument to the timestamp function.
> Since Derby (and JDBC) supports nanosecond resolution, the TIMESTAMP function should also support it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.